Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 Ladies, I could use some suggestions from anyone who has had to go rounds with insurance coverage. To date all of my appts have been coded as Infertility (which is only covered at 50%) because that was my original intent when I first saw the RE. But as a result of my 1st test, HSG, the RE found my T-shape and a blockage in my tubes. We immediately schedule the lap/hyst and I started to ask a few questions about coverage. At this time I knew absolutely NOTHING about MAs as no one in my family had ever been dx. I started by talking with the billing clerk at the RE office who stated that any procedure re: blocked fallopian tubes " must " be billed as IF but the T-shape would be coded separately. I then proceeded to get the all of the codes related to the surgery and called the claims dept of my ins co to get the assoc costs. After speaking w/ at least 4 sep. pp, I was told that everything would be covered at 50% because it was all related to IF. I kind of gave up at this point and figured that it needed to be done and it would be worth any cost. FF to this week and some prompting from Ann & Mikell (thanks ladies!!!), I've gotten fired up again and I am preparing to fight. I got a copy of our ins. Cert of Coverage from my HR Director (I live in MI and have MCARE HMO). She mentioned that since all claims are processed based on the procedure and diagnosis codes that it might be a good idea to talk with the billing clerk in my dr. office. So I called my docs office and she stated, again, that that lap would require the infertility dx code because it was to correct the fallopian tube. This is where I'm getting a little confused as to how to prepare an appeals argument. I believe that I can argue the hyst portion of the surgery easily enough as I've found several published medical studies detailing MAs. But, based on what the billing clerk stated, the lap part is a little trickier. The RE explained that he found that the end of my fallopian tube, near the fimbriae, was semi- closed so there was a greater risk that an egg wouldn't be picked up. He found no sign of endometriosis. To me, it's obvious that this problem wouldn't be the result of some sort of trauma to the region, but that it's been there since birth. But since every MA document that I've found only focuses on the uterus, how do I gather evidence to support that the lap was necessary in regards to dx and treating the MA? I'm going to start by going to my RE directly but I would greatly appreciate any suggestions. Thanks in advance, T-shape remodeled 10/06/2005 TTC #1 since 01/2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 , I live in Michigan too and have Blue Care Network (also an HMO). Now my insurance is a bit different as it does confer infertility excluding IVF. However, my lap/hyst was not diagnosed as IF, it was diagnosed as a birth defect and I paid zero out of pocket costs. Don't know if this helps or not, but thought I would share. And BTW, my RE's office handled all the referrals, etc. So I would definitely go to them first. I actually got to know the biller quite well. LOL Diane PCOS, SU Resected DD 5/25/2005 --------------------------------- Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 , Insurance can be terribly frustrating, can't it? I've spent at least 40 hours this year trying to resolve claim issues between doctors offices and insurance companies. What I have found is that billing clerks really don't always know what they are talking about. I have almost never had a problem with the insurance company. The coverage may not be what I want, but payment errors have almost always been the billing clerk's fault in my experience. Having said that, it sounds like both your insurance company and your RE's office may not be handling your claims correctly. It sounds like you have really worked hard to get somewhere with your insurance company. Did you find out what the coverage is for correcting birth defects? While they say that it is IF, diagnosing & correcting a t-shape is not necessarily just IF. It can cause pain and you could have other problems that can only be diagnosed via hysteroscopy (such as intrauterine adhesions or scarring). As for the lap, it is the same thing. It is a diagnostic procedure for issues that may or may not be fertility related. Do you have any other risks associated with the fallopian tube? Is there an increased risk for ectopic pregnancy? Is your risk of infection increased due to the partial blockage? I'm not so familiar with this issue, but these may be questions you can ask your doctor to help build your case that this is not just an IF issue. Also, endometriosis is not just an IF issue either. Even if your doctor did not find any, that doesn't mean that the procedure wasn't warranted to diagnose whether you had it or not. Were you having any other symptoms besides IF, such as pelvic pain, irregular periods, etc.? These are not IF issues, but gynelogical issues that are often diagnosed via laparoscopy. Have you thought of involving a lawyer, or at least threatening to do so? That might help your case. Also, do you know if your mom took DES when she was pregnant with you? This can cause problems with both the uterus and the fallopian tubes (as well as the cervix). It could provide support for your birth defect theory. Btw, I don't recall your age or geographic region, but DES was administered after 1971, especially internationally into the late 70's. I was exposed in early 1971 and born at the end of 1971, but I know women younger than me who were exposed to DES as well. The CDC's DES update can be found at http://www.cdc.gov/des/consumers/download/cdc_des_update.pdf. Also, if your mom was exposed to DES, you could potentially be affected (research is still on-going with third-generation DES exposed children). One other suggestion for your next procedure: Do you have the option of having two insurance companies (maybe with your husand?) next year? If so, can you wait until next year? I had two insurances last year and all of my expences were covered as long as I was going to in network doctors. With all of the copays and procedure expenses that I had, this helped a lot. I'm sorry if it seems like I am reaching, but I really wish that I could help you! If I come up with anything else, I'll let you know! Keep us posted on your progress! Good luck & Best wishes, Mikell, 34 t-shape 28 wks 1 m/c 2/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 , Insurance can be terribly frustrating, can't it? I've spent at least 40 hours this year trying to resolve claim issues between doctors offices and insurance companies. What I have found is that billing clerks really don't always know what they are talking about. I have almost never had a problem with the insurance company. The coverage may not be what I want, but payment errors have almost always been the billing clerk's fault in my experience. Having said that, it sounds like both your insurance company and your RE's office may not be handling your claims correctly. It sounds like you have really worked hard to get somewhere with your insurance company. Did you find out what the coverage is for correcting birth defects? While they say that it is IF, diagnosing & correcting a t-shape is not necessarily just IF. It can cause pain and you could have other problems that can only be diagnosed via hysteroscopy (such as intrauterine adhesions or scarring). As for the lap, it is the same thing. It is a diagnostic procedure for issues that may or may not be fertility related. Do you have any other risks associated with the fallopian tube? Is there an increased risk for ectopic pregnancy? Is your risk of infection increased due to the partial blockage? I'm not so familiar with this issue, but these may be questions you can ask your doctor to help build your case that this is not just an IF issue. Also, endometriosis is not just an IF issue either. Even if your doctor did not find any, that doesn't mean that the procedure wasn't warranted to diagnose whether you had it or not. Were you having any other symptoms besides IF, such as pelvic pain, irregular periods, etc.? These are not IF issues, but gynelogical issues that are often diagnosed via laparoscopy. Have you thought of involving a lawyer, or at least threatening to do so? That might help your case. Also, do you know if your mom took DES when she was pregnant with you? This can cause problems with both the uterus and the fallopian tubes (as well as the cervix). It could provide support for your birth defect theory. Btw, I don't recall your age or geographic region, but DES was administered after 1971, especially internationally into the late 70's. I was exposed in early 1971 and born at the end of 1971, but I know women younger than me who were exposed to DES as well. The CDC's DES update can be found at http://www.cdc.gov/des/consumers/download/cdc_des_update.pdf. Also, if your mom was exposed to DES, you could potentially be affected (research is still on-going with third-generation DES exposed children). One other suggestion for your next procedure: Do you have the option of having two insurance companies (maybe with your husand?) next year? If so, can you wait until next year? I had two insurances last year and all of my expences were covered as long as I was going to in network doctors. With all of the copays and procedure expenses that I had, this helped a lot. I'm sorry if it seems like I am reaching, but I really wish that I could help you! If I come up with anything else, I'll let you know! Keep us posted on your progress! Good luck & Best wishes, Mikell, 34 t-shape 28 wks 1 m/c 2/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 , Insurance can be terribly frustrating, can't it? I've spent at least 40 hours this year trying to resolve claim issues between doctors offices and insurance companies. What I have found is that billing clerks really don't always know what they are talking about. I have almost never had a problem with the insurance company. The coverage may not be what I want, but payment errors have almost always been the billing clerk's fault in my experience. Having said that, it sounds like both your insurance company and your RE's office may not be handling your claims correctly. It sounds like you have really worked hard to get somewhere with your insurance company. Did you find out what the coverage is for correcting birth defects? While they say that it is IF, diagnosing & correcting a t-shape is not necessarily just IF. It can cause pain and you could have other problems that can only be diagnosed via hysteroscopy (such as intrauterine adhesions or scarring). As for the lap, it is the same thing. It is a diagnostic procedure for issues that may or may not be fertility related. Do you have any other risks associated with the fallopian tube? Is there an increased risk for ectopic pregnancy? Is your risk of infection increased due to the partial blockage? I'm not so familiar with this issue, but these may be questions you can ask your doctor to help build your case that this is not just an IF issue. Also, endometriosis is not just an IF issue either. Even if your doctor did not find any, that doesn't mean that the procedure wasn't warranted to diagnose whether you had it or not. Were you having any other symptoms besides IF, such as pelvic pain, irregular periods, etc.? These are not IF issues, but gynelogical issues that are often diagnosed via laparoscopy. Have you thought of involving a lawyer, or at least threatening to do so? That might help your case. Also, do you know if your mom took DES when she was pregnant with you? This can cause problems with both the uterus and the fallopian tubes (as well as the cervix). It could provide support for your birth defect theory. Btw, I don't recall your age or geographic region, but DES was administered after 1971, especially internationally into the late 70's. I was exposed in early 1971 and born at the end of 1971, but I know women younger than me who were exposed to DES as well. The CDC's DES update can be found at http://www.cdc.gov/des/consumers/download/cdc_des_update.pdf. Also, if your mom was exposed to DES, you could potentially be affected (research is still on-going with third-generation DES exposed children). One other suggestion for your next procedure: Do you have the option of having two insurance companies (maybe with your husand?) next year? If so, can you wait until next year? I had two insurances last year and all of my expences were covered as long as I was going to in network doctors. With all of the copays and procedure expenses that I had, this helped a lot. I'm sorry if it seems like I am reaching, but I really wish that I could help you! If I come up with anything else, I'll let you know! Keep us posted on your progress! Good luck & Best wishes, Mikell, 34 t-shape 28 wks 1 m/c 2/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.