UU & S

[Guest guest]

Hi

I want to TTC agian using IUI. I conceived during this way in Nov last year

with twins; but m/c the baby in the good UU and had to have the baby

terminated in the bad side as it was too risky to carry. Obvioulsy I am

concerned this could ahppen again and would have to go down the same route,

but hope that the odds of it happening again are remote. How big is your

non communicating side and is it firmly attached to your UU? Mine is big

and firmly attached and the risks to remove it are too risky. So I think I

will have to just take the chance again.

I have not heard of the other drugs you mentioned instead of clomid. Do

they lessen the chnaces of multiples than clomid. When you had the IUi did

you only have one follicle?

Janine

Re: UD with intrauterine growth restriction

(preg/child ment)

>

> Hi Elna-

> I experienced IUGR w/my pg. I cut back drastically on my activity, eat &

> drank better and we noticed an improvement. That isn't to imply that you

> aren't

> doing those things ... just relating my experience. My DD was born on her

> DD

> at 7lbs 14oz.

>

> Yes, women w/MAs do have an increased occurrence of IUGR *BUT* it is not

> due

> to lack of space ... common misconception. It appears to be due to either

> the blood vessels supplying the uterus OR something about the way our

> placentas

> develop/attach/age. They just don't know, but its not a space/strechiness

> issue.

>

> I'm glad to hear the umbilical flow & fluid look good :-) Hang in there

> and

> keep us posted!

> G

> ud

>

> In a message dated 5/20/2005 7:07:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,

> MullerianAnomalies writes:

>

> Hello! I have posted " my UD story " in april, where I wrote that

> everything was going well with my pregnancy...so far.

> Now I am 32 weeks, and had an US two days ago. The gyn discovered by

> measurements of the head and abdomen that my baby is 37% smaller than

> average! (A month ago it was 6%)

> He got me an appointment at the hospital the next day, so they could

> consider performing a c-section or not. They just found the same growth

> deviation, but the umbillical blood flow and amniotic (?) fluid was ok,

> so they let the baby stay where she was...

> Controls every week from now, hope the deviation is not increasing.

> They hope to let her stay until at least 36 weeks. I dont know how

> small she must be for them to take action. Anyone experience this?

>

> How common is this among the MA-ladies? Does the UD cause this because

> it is simply not enough room to grow?

>

> Elna, UD

> 32W with #1

>

>

>

>

>

>