Guest guest Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 , This may have been discussed recently already, but I haven't been following the board as closely as I would like to. My apologies in particular if you've already addressed this issue as it pertains to you. Anyhow, health insurance should NOT be treating MA diagnosis and surgeries as diagnosis and surgery for the treatment of infertility. Tests such as HSGs, MRIs, 3d ultrasounds, etc. and surgeries such as metroplasties (the whole gamut, from lap/hyst resection procedures, to vaginal septum resections, to the rare case of abdominal procedures - i.e., Strassman, Thompkins, etc.) are for the diagnosis and treatment of BIRTH DEFECTS. Congenital abnormalities generally are not (and in some cases, CAN NOT) be excluded from coverage, and should be covered at a higher or full rate, NOT at the same reduced rate that infertility treatment may be covered at. Surgery required for MAs is for the purpose of returning the body to " normal " function. Think of it this way - heck, if the insurance person denying coverage is male, use this as an example! Some male babies (~1 out of 300) are born with hypospadias, a condition in which the opening of the urethra (where urine exits from the penis) is in the wrong place. Reconstructive surgery involves, in short, putting the opening in the right place (and creating as cosmetically normal-appearing penis as possible). If the opening of the urethra is substantially far back on the penis (or even scrotum), or if it has a severe bend in it, then it may interfere with urination, sexual intercourse and fertility. So, does correction of this malformation make it a treatment for infertility? I THINK NOT! Does it make a difference that surgery for this condition is typically done between 6 and 18 months of age while surgery for MAs is typically done as an adult? I THINK NOT!! While some insurance companies may balk and ultimately not give you any more coverage, DO NOT let them do this without a fight. In most cases, framing your issue to them as something OTHER than infertility can be very successful in getting more coverage. I can't say this strongly enough. PLEASE, everyone who is still undergoing diagnostic procedures or looking at resections, MAKE SURE that you are getting the full amount of benefits that you are entitled to. * Make sure that your insurance companies are processing claims for the dx and tx of a congenital anomaly, and NOT for infertility. * Make sure that your doctors are coding your treatments and tests for the dx and tx of a congenital anomaly, and NOT for infertility. * If need be, emphasize other NON INFERTILITY issues that you may have in conjunction with your MA to support that this is a congenital anomaly that warrants proper diagnosis and correction. Do you have painful periods? Do you have debilitating cramps? Is sex painful? Do you also have endo and concurrent endo issues? * If your insurance company still insists that your dx and tx are for infertility, APPEAL the decision. Have your claim and condition reviewed by a MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL at the insurance company (not a claims processor). I believe that our founder, Beth, actually had an insurance company nurse who helped her get the coverage she was entitled to, and went so far as to check to make sure she was doing ok. * Have your doctor intervene in this process if necessary - DO NOT BE AFRAID TO ASK. Your doc may even have someone on staff who is experienced in dealing with insurance issues. * If your employer has a decent HR department, check with them to see if they have an advocate whose JOB is to intervene on your behalf in insurance disputes. < > Whew. Sorry about the length of this. I just hate to see people not receive the benefits that they are entitled to (and that they are PAYING FOR) because some drone thinks that any treatment beyond an annual exam and any testing beyond an annual pap smear automatically means infertility which automatically means no or reduced coverage. < > Ann __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.