Re: Reply 2: MMR

[Guest guest]

<< Yes, this is what I was referring to, also. If your child shows immunity

to

the first round of shots (via: blood titer test) , you can get off from

having them re-vaccinated with the boosters.

>>

But what if your kid doesn't show the immunity? W

[Guest guest]

<< Yes, this is what I was referring to, also. If your child shows immunity

to

the first round of shots (via: blood titer test) , you can get off from

having them re-vaccinated with the boosters.

>>

Sorry, sending off again.

As I was saying, what if your child doesn't show the immunity? Or why

should the child even have to have their blood drawn to find out? There is a

debate about vaccines yet somehow I have missed the information that children

used to be given this booster at age 12. Why isn't there a clear, simple

message like this one from the anti-vaccine people? The MMR vaccination was

changed for the convenience of the Dept of Ed or whoever. I won't be a

maverick by not vaccinating my child at age 5 or putting my child at risk to

disease if I wait a few years. I just don't understand why this isn't

clearer for parents. I am fortunate that I am exposed to info like the titer

test but many parents are not. Please understand. I am completely aware of

how to avoid the MMR for . My issue is with the fact that some

information is not clearly being communicated by our organized groups.

Barb

[Guest guest]

Then I guess you get religious! :c) Actually I'm really kidding as it's also

scary to think your kid doesn't have immunity. A total catch-22!

JoAnne

BarbStrate@... wrote:

>

>

> << Yes, this is what I was referring to, also. If your child shows immunity

> to

> the first round of shots (via: blood titer test) , you can get off from

> having them re-vaccinated with the boosters.

>

> >>

>

> But what if your kid doesn't show the immunity? W

>

>