Guest guest Posted July 20, 2002 Report Share Posted July 20, 2002 You shared your story with us I will share mine. I got married overweight at 18 at 24 I decided I would find away to have this surgery done and I did. My husband went off to Korea for almost 2 years leaving me alone with 3 kids.My addictin I could say was many after about a year of feeling dpressed because husband went away trying to deal with the kids on my own we decided we would seperated even though we really aready were. I started going out all the time, that was one of my addictions right there I felt I had to get out for 8 years I had been the good wife putting up with alcoholism, adultry and much more. I loved all the attention from men. But the alcohol always made me feel horrible giving me really bad heart burn. There were times when I would go out of a bar or club and make myself throwup other times I had to rush to the gas statiion to down some milk or malox. Then came the real drug estasy, for me this was perfect. It didn't make me feel like I was having a heart attack, I don't think it hit me as hard as others because of the way we absorb things but I felt good and I did this drug often 3-4 times a week. I knew that it could kill me in a instant, I know that it could still of caused holes in my brain but I didn't care. My husband came back in April of last year, we decided to get back together in July we had a new baby in March of this year. I have not done drugs sincee may of 2001, my husband still is an alcoholic we argue all the time because he wants us to go out. I would rather not put myself in that position just because I know how the alcohol will affect me. Dawn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2005 Report Share Posted December 1, 2005 A quick question then I will drop this.... You said you have no sympathy for the drug addict or alcoholic but do you have sympathy for the 350 person? MB Re: addictions But the alcoholic never HAS to take that first drink. We all know the dangers of alcohol. We all know the dangers of drugs. We all know the dangers of smoking. We all know the dangers of being overweight. The difference is, we don't have to start smoking, drinking or doing drugs. We HAVE to have food. Often we are brought up eating unhealthy from childhood - so we're addicted to the bad stuff from an early age. As we grow older we get conflicting reports - this is good, then it's bad, then it's good again, then it's bad.....so we're confused about what to eat and what not to eat. We buy diet foods, thinking we're making better choices, only to find out that some of the so-called " diet " foods are worse for us than the regular stuff we'd been eating. So we get a little more confused. A lot of people that are overweight are not overweight because they gorgue themselves on Oreo's/cookies/cakes, etc. They are overweight because of other reasons - because they don't know when to STOP eating, or they are emotional eaters, or whatever. If it is as simple as choosing the right food, then why are we all here? -Chris -Beth hayescol@...> wrote: I have to say I do not agree with the logic. We have to eat yes...but do we have to eat the bad stuff? We know Mcs/double stuffed Oreo's/cookies/cakes are bad just like the alcoholic knows liquor is bad for them. We know we are growing larger, our clothes not fitting us, we do not have the stamina we once had, we have joint problems, heart problems, diabetics but yet we still eat what is bad for us. MB I don't have a lot of sympathy for anyone addicted to booze, drugs, or cigarettes. (Hope I don't offend anyone.) I mean, we HAVE to eat to live. We can't just give it up. But everyone knows the dangers of smoking, taking drugs, or drinking. Yet the choose to start anyway. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Personals Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet. Lots of someones, actually. Try Yahoo! Personals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2005 Report Share Posted December 1, 2005 I don't recall saying it was DIFFERENT. What I said was that they didn't have to start in the first place......... Bad food is addictive, sure. Again, the difference is that the drug addict didn't have to take that pill or pick up that needle, and the alcoholic didn't have to take that first drink. The difference is also that the drug addict/alcoholic KNOWS it's bad for them. The food addict, often times, may think they're making wise choices when in reality they are not. You have to make wiser choices with food - you can't just stop it all together. -Chris -Beth hayescol@...> wrote: When you are not hungry but continue to eat on a regular basis for other reasons...comfort, craving, emotions, peer pressure knowing it is bad for you, how is that different from the drug addict or alcoholic who can't stop? MB Re: addictions But the alcoholic never HAS to take that first drink. We all know the dangers of alcohol. We all know the dangers of drugs. We all know the dangers of smoking. We all know the dangers of being overweight. The difference is, we don't have to start smoking, drinking or doing drugs. We HAVE to have food. Often we are brought up eating unhealthy from childhood - so we're addicted to the bad stuff from an early age. As we grow older we get conflicting reports - this is good, then it's bad, then it's good again, then it's bad.....so we're confused about what to eat and what not to eat. We buy diet foods, thinking we're making better choices, only to find out that some of the so-called " diet " foods are worse for us than the regular stuff we'd been eating. So we get a little more confused. A lot of people that are overweight are not overweight because they gorgue themselves on Oreo's/cookies/cakes, etc. They are overweight because of other reasons - because they don't know when to STOP eating, or they are emotional eaters, or whatever. If it is as simple as choosing the right food, then why are we all here? -Chris -Beth hayescol@...> wrote: I have to say I do not agree with the logic. We have to eat yes...but do we have to eat the bad stuff? We know Mcs/double stuffed Oreo's/cookies/cakes are bad just like the alcoholic knows liquor is bad for them. We know we are growing larger, our clothes not fitting us, we do not have the stamina we once had, we have joint problems, heart problems, diabetics but yet we still eat what is bad for us. MB I don't have a lot of sympathy for anyone addicted to booze, drugs, or cigarettes. (Hope I don't offend anyone.) I mean, we HAVE to eat to live. We can't just give it up. But everyone knows the dangers of smoking, taking drugs, or drinking. Yet the choose to start anyway. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Personals Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet. Lots of someones, actually. Try Yahoo! Personals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2005 Report Share Posted December 2, 2005 But the overeater is often brought up on junk food. How many people do you know that never had any junk food at all until they were adults? Most of us were given that first bite of ice cream or cookies or chocolate or potato chips as toddlers....... ann maryann127@...> wrote: And the overweight person doesn't have to have that first bite of cake or ice cream or cookies or chocolate or potato chips, but they do anyway. I don't know anyone who got fat overeating broccoli or chicken. ann > > I don't recall saying it was DIFFERENT. What I said was that they didn't have to start in the first place......... > > Bad food is addictive, sure. > > Again, the difference is that the drug addict didn't have to take that pill or pick up that needle, and the alcoholic didn't have to take that first drink. The difference is also that the drug addict/alcoholic KNOWS it's bad for them. The food addict, often times, may think they're making wise choices when in reality they are not. You have to make wiser choices with food - you can't just stop it all together. > > -Chris Please send your recipes for inclusion in the Files to the Moderator at: South-Beach-Diet-Getting-It-Right-owner Reminder: The South Beach Diet is not low-carb. Nor is it low-fat. The South Beach Diet teaches you to rely on the right carbs and the right fats-the good ones - and enables you to live quite happily without the bad carbs and bad fats. For more on this Way Of Eating please read " The South Beach Diet " by Arthur Agatston, MD. ISBN 1-57954-814-8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.