Guest guest Posted May 2, 1999 Report Share Posted May 2, 1999 Subj: [HEALTHE] Fraud in medical research Date: 5/2/99 10:32:09 PM Central Daylight Time From: UncleWolf@... ( Gach) Sender: HEALTHE@... (Health and Environment Resource Center) Reply-to: HEALTHE@...HEALTHE@... (Health and Environment Resource Center) To: HEALTHE@... British Medical Journal, 1999;318:1164 ( 1 May ) Falsifying data is main problem in US research fraud review Mark Pownall , London Half of the US biomedical researchers accused of scientific fraud and subjected to formal investigations in recent years have been found guilty of misconduct, a new review has found. In the biggest review of scientific fraud ever published, the US Office of Research Integrity, has released data on nearly a thousand allegations investigated over the five years from 1993 to 1997. The review covered inquiries into allegations of misconduct into research funded by the US Public Health Service, which has a budget of $15 bilion. Altogether, 150 cases were formally investigated after a preliminary assessment of whether there was a case to answer. Of these investigations, 76 resulted in findings of scientific misconduct - mostly falsification and fabrication but also plagiarism. Accusations of research fraud were most likely to result in a ruling of misconduct for the least experienced medical researchers, with allegations against professors and assistant professors less likely to result in a guilty verdict. Larry Rhoades, director of the division of policy and education at the Office of Research Integrity, said that the figures suggested that " the system is more protective of senior than junior researchers, " and that senior academics were more able to defend themselves against accusations. " But we do not know why there are these patterns. We hope researchers might find it interesting to look at these questions. " Dr Rhoades pointed out that the academic grade of associate professor, which is one step below the top ranking professor grade, seemed to attract the most allegations of misconduct. Nearly a third (31%) of the allegations were aimed at this grade, of which 17 out of 45 (38%) resulted in findings of misconduct. Most whistleblowers were senior academics, chiefly professors and associate professors, and they made about half of the allegations. Dr Rhoades called for international agreement on collecting data on scientific fraud to enable those policing medical researchers to make valid international comparisons. Scientific Misconduct Investigations 1993-1997, is available from the Office of Public Health and Science, Office of Research Integrity, Suite 700, 5515 Security Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, USA (tel: +1 301 445 5300). *Peace and Light* The Health and Environment Round-Table Educate the general public about potential environmental threats to physical, emotional, and psychological health and well-being. Develop management strategies to reduce risks and stay healthy in an increasingly toxic world. A round-table forum for the public, medical, scientific, and legal communities, industry and media to reach out and work together toward making our world safer. Bring your questions, opinions, concerns, information, articles, and skepticism to the HealthE Round-Table. Please send personal mail privately. SNIP! Limit excessive requoting of posts, do not quote this banner. Courtesy, tolerance, and respect at all times. Commands in the BODY of email to: listserv@... as follows: Want DIGEST version of list? Send: set HealthE digest Read ARCHIVES not email? Send: set HealthE nomail Keyword searchable archives at: http://206.241.12.9/archives/healthe.html Automated list assistance send HELP in the body of email to: HealthE-request@... ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: owner-healthe@...> Received: from rly-zd01.mx.aol.com (rly-zd01.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.225]) by air-zd05.mail.aol.com (v59.4) with SMTP; Sun, 02 May 1999 23:32:08 -0400 Received: from LIME.EASE.LSOFT.COM (lime.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.1.41]) by rly-zd01.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with ESMTP id XAA07056; Sun, 2 May 1999 23:32:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by LIME.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id 4.001D0F6D@...>; 2 May 1999 23:30:40 -0400 Received: from HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM by HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 26110988 for HEALTHE@...; Sun, 2 May 1999 23:35:33 -0400 Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net by home.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id 0.FF49832F@...>; 2 May 1999 23:35:29 -0400 Received: from ATT ([12.72.71.217]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07 118 124) with SMTP id <19990503033102.CLJE9558@ATT> for healthe@...>; Mon, 3 May 1999 03:31:02 +0000 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: 372D1836.DB9@...> Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 20:29:58 -0700 Reply-To: Health and Environment Resource Center HEALTHE@...> Sender: Health and Environment Resource Center HEALTHE@...> Subject: [HEALTHE] Fraud in medical research To: HEALTHE@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.