Guest guest Posted April 28, 1999 Report Share Posted April 28, 1999 Subj: Paper on CWD in captive elk Date: 4/28/99 1:24:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time From: jmiller@... (Janice M. ) Sender: BSE-L@... (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) Reply-to: BSE-L@... (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) To: BSE-L@... In response to the comments of Dr. Tom Pringle on April 23, in the item headed *explosive paper on CWD under-diagnosis still under wraps,* I would like to make the following clarification. The work was done last summer (not 16 months ago, as reported in the item posted), a manuscript was subsequently submitted through the ARS approval system, and final approval was received September 28, 1998. The paper was then submitted as a brief communication to Veterinary Record. The journal returned the manuscript in December with reviewer comments that included many helpful suggestions for improvement. However, the major concern was that the work should have presented a more detailed description of the neuroanatomical PrPSc localizations. Unfortunately, we were not able to meet such a requirement because the brain samples that had been collected were not appropriate for such a study. In view of this situation, we decided to withdraw the paper from consideration by Veterinary Record and the senior author is now rewriting the paper for submission to a different journal. With regard to specific information presented in the paper, it should be noted that the 17 animals examined were a selected group taken from a very large herd and the selection process was not intended to provide a valid assessment of overall CWD prevalence. I don*t think people familiar with the TSE literature on PrP immunohistochemistry (IHC) will be at all surprised that we were able to detect positive brains in elk that had not yet developed clinical signs or lesions. This kind of observation was reported several years ago using laboratory animal models of scrapie. Furthermore, in our 1993 and 1994 papers on the use of IHC for scrapie diagnosis in sheep, we reported finding many IHC positive brains that had been designated as only suggestive or inconclusive for scrapie by histopathological criteria. Since that time the APHIS National Veterinary Services Laboratory has been using IHC for diagnosis of TSEs. According to Drs. Detwiler and Al , all brains from sheep, goats, cattle, deer, and elk with neurological disease are examined histologically and by IHC. Brains from the *downer cow* surveillance program are also examined by both tests. APHIS, with the assistance of state animal health and wildlife officials, has tested over 2000 brain samples from free-ranging cervids in Nebraska, South Dakota, Kansas, Michigan, and New Jersey. All brains were negative for PrPSc by IHC. State diagnostic laboratories know about the availability of IHC testing at the NVSL and tissue samples from suspect cases are sent to that laboratory on a referral basis. I hope that someone directly involved in the Colorado and Wyoming CWD surveillance programs will comment on their use of IHC. However, I can say that from conversations with Drs. Mike , Terry Spraker, and Beth , I know that IHC has been used routinely in the diagnostic laboratories of both states for several years so undoubtedly the 1998 prevalence report was based on that type of testing procedure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.