Guest guest Posted April 1, 1999 Report Share Posted April 1, 1999 I am not a nay-sayer, but I must comment one more time that if directives are issued that CJD is infectious after an autopsy occurs: 1. You can kiss any more firm dignosis and statistical reporting goodbye. There won't be any cases that will hold up under scrutiny on a state level or by the CDC if there aren't autopsies to prove it. I have experienced this first hand. 2. There won't be any families who will agree to an autopsy if they know that their family member will not be embalmed and therefore will not be allowed to have a regular funeral service. It isn't going to happen. It is hard enough right now to convince families to agree to such an invasive procedure after their loved ones have gone through so much. If their final goodbye is taken away, they aren't going to give a damn about future CJD research, but rather the here and now. If we had been told that my father would not be allowed to be embalmed after autopsy, we would have NOT agreed to the autopsy. They are playing with human emotion here. 3. How do you think the funeral directors in this country are going to react to CJD victims if they are told by a supposedly reliable organization that they are at risk? I am going to find out who is behind these new " findings " in CJD research. I will challenge them to cite specific medical and scientific tests that were performed to prove that CJD patients are infectious after autopsies are performed. If there have been no new studies proving this, then they are completely without merit and should not be passed off as fact. We are dealing with science here and it absolutely infuriates me that this information (whether it be fact or fallacy) is being handed down as gospel. We have come too far to allow the door to be slammed on accurate statistical reporting. By the way, does anyone know that someone from the CDC told one of our Voice members that the one-in-a-million statistic is based on the chance that you will live to be 100?? In other words, if you don't live to be 100, your odds become greater that you will succumb to CJD. I don't want to quote the person at this point because I received this information second-hand and I haven't proven it yet. Food for thought. The semantics game again. It seems very strange to me that all of a sudden, now that young cases of CJD are emerging (does everyone remember the fact that nvCJD hits YOUNG people??), the rules are changing. Pat hit the nail on the head when she said that US government agencies dread the day that we will find BSE in this country and you can be darn sure that they are going to do everything in their power to keep us from finding it. Please remember that nvCJD victims are only diagnosed as such from AUTOPSY. This is such a simple ploy to curb progress in the field of CJD and nvCJD research. I wondered how the FDA and CDC would counteract our petition. Now I know. They are going to play hardball with us and they make the rules. I don't care about the feelings that are " hurt " in government because of accusations. I don't care if they take this personally. My feelings are " hurt " because my dad died from a horrible, nasty brain-eater. This is business. It is their job to protect the welfare of the citizens of this country. I agree with the fact that if CJD is infectious, then medical people who handle them could be at risk; however, if the CDC is allowed to skew the statistics, we will NEVER know who has the disease for sure. Remember, the CDC says that this is a one in a million rarity. Do we assume that they have discovered that CJD victims are predominately medical people? I think out of CJD Voice, we have maybe 3 or 4 victims who were in the medical profession. Without accurate statistics, the CDC will have done the entire country a disservice. You could be the next person who is operated on after a CJD victim. We won't know because these cases will go unreported. Reread the petition and find out exactly what it says about the CDC and their lack of concern. It is a life or death situation. It involves the health and welfare of each and every person in this country. Am I angry? You damned right I am. I have promised my dad that I would make a difference. We should consider what we are here for. If we want to make a difference, then we are going to have to move forward. Otherwise, we lose. Beverly G. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.