Guest guest Posted December 27, 1998 Report Share Posted December 27, 1998 -- Could someone please explain to me, WHY, the MEDICAL SOCIETY is SO CONCERNED about nvCJD contaminating the BLOOD SUPPLY, and WHY NO ONE IS CONCERNED ABOUT (supposedly) classical CJD, CONTAMINATING THE BLOOD SUPPLY? I would like to know, why the medical society thinks the THEOREDICAL RISK OF nvCJD, is possible. BUT, the THEOREDICAL RISK OF CJD, IS NOT?????? THEY BOTH KILL YOU THE SAME HIDEOUS WAY! IN FACT, THE 29 YEAR OLD IN UTAH, REALLY PUT A MONKEY WRENCH IN THERE THEORY OF, " YOUNG PEOPLE CAN'T GET CJD " , THEY GET nvCJD???????? What's their explanatin on this, NOW???????/// Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 1998 Report Share Posted December 27, 1998 In a message dated 12/27/98 10:04:23 AM Central Standard Time, flounder@... writes: << -- Could someone please explain to me, WHY, the MEDICAL SOCIETY is SO CONCERNED about nvCJD contaminating the BLOOD SUPPLY, and WHY NO ONE IS CONCERNED ABOUT (supposedly) classical CJD, CONTAMINATING THE BLOOD SUPPLY? I would like to know, why the medical society thinks the THEOREDICAL RISK OF nvCJD, is possible. BUT, the THEOREDICAL RISK OF CJD, IS NOT?????? THEY BOTH KILL YOU THE SAME HIDEOUS WAY! IN FACT, THE 29 YEAR OLD IN UTAH, REALLY PUT A MONKEY WRENCH IN THERE THEORY OF, " YOUNG PEOPLE CAN'T GET CJD " , THEY GET nvCJD???????? What's their explanatin on this, NOW???????/// >> My question, exactly, Terry! Thanks, I couldn't have said it better! Yvette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.