Guest guest Posted January 28, 1999 Report Share Posted January 28, 1999 These articles were in Eurosurveillance Weekly New national disease surveillance unit for Ireland A national disease surveillance unit for Ireland was finally given the green light in 1998. Dr Darina O’Flanagan took up the post of director in late October, having moved from the Department of Public Health of the Eastern Health Board. The unit will concentrate initially on surveillance of infectious disease but its role will expand to include surveillance of environmental hazards and other non-infectious diseases. Priorities for the new unit will be to overhaul the notification system and infectious disease regulations and to set up structures for the surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. The new unit will work closely with key partners already working in the control of communicable disease, including Ireland’s eight regional departments of public health and environmental health units, clinical microbiologists, infectious disease physicians, general practitioners, veterinarians, and its Food Safety Authority and Department of Health and Children, and will collaborate with the new regional epidemiological unit in Northern Ireland and with other national institutes in Europe. Busy times are ahead! Dr Darina O'Flanagan, (doflanagan@...) The National Disease Surveillance Unit, (ndsu@...), Sir Dun's Hospital, Lower Grand Canal Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Telephone: +353 1 661 7346, Fax: +353 1 661 7347. Reported by Lelia Thornton (thornton@...), Eastern Health Board, Dublin, Ireland Back to news contents Networks or a Centre for infectious diseases in Europe? Two letters in the Lancet this week from proponents of a European supra- national centre for infectious diseases continue the debate on whether networks of communicable disease specialists or a representative centre are likely to serve the identification, production, and control of communicable diseases best. The latest comments suggest that an important role for such a centre would be to act as a role through which privileged links could be established with eastern Europe and developing countries (1,2). Many of the existing European surveillance networks for specific infections, however, already liaise with many eastern European countries quite successfully. However this debate concludes, everyone would agree that effective international prevention and control of infectious diseases is completely dependent on the quality of national surveillance. Thus the creation of a national surveillance unit in Ireland (see above) is most welcome. References: 1.Tibayrenc M. European centre for infectious disease. Lancet 1999; 353: 329. (http:www.thelancet.com) 2.Sehgal R. European centre for infectious disease. Lancet 1999; 353: 329. (http:www.thelancet.com) Reported by Noël Gill (ngill@...), PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London, England Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.