Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Monsanto/BST

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

> Monsanto saw secret EU documents

> US biotech firm under fire in Europe

>

> By Palast and Terry Slavin

> Observer (London) Sunday February 21, 1999

>

> Monsanto, the US biotech group fined in an English court last week for

> failing to control genetic modification trials, is under attack on two new

> fronts. First for obtaining an advance look at confidential European

> Commission documents during its campaign to win regulatory approval for

> its controversial bovine growth hormone (BST). Second, because of its

> legal actions against hundreds of North American farmers for failing to

> pay for its genetically modified seeds.

>

> Company faxes and Canadian government files obtained this week by The

> Observer reveal that Monsanto received copies of the position papers of

> the EC Director General for Agriculture and Fisheries prior to a February

> 1998 meeting that approved milk from cows treated with BST.

>

> Notes jotted down by a Canadian government researcher during a

> November 1997 phone call from Monsanto's regulatory chief indicate that

> the company 'received the [documents] package from Dr Nick Weber', a

> researcher with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). He was given

> them as a member of the Joint Expert Committee on Food and Drug Additives

> (JECFA), part of the World Health Organisation, which reviewed the

> Monsanto drug for Codex, the agency that approves products as safe for

> international trade.

>

> Sources noted that Weber's supervisor at the US FDA is Dr Margaret

> who, before joining the agency, directed a Monsanto laboratory

> working on the hormone. Monsanto also obtained an advance look at the

> submission to JECFA by British pharmaceuticals researcher Verrall.

> Verrall, a member of the UK Food Ethics Council, told The Observer that

> slipping papers to Monsanto was 'totally wrong'.

>

> BST boosts milk output in cows but, say critics, may increase the

> likelihood of human cancers for those who drink milk. Advance knowledge

> of objections to the hormone seems likely to have helped Monsanto to

> prepare arguments in advance of the EU meeting.

>

> In September at a meeting of a Codex panel in Washington, the UK's

> opposition to immediate acceptance of the Monsanto hormone resulted in a

> tie vote on the drug among 24 nations. The US representative, citing the

> JECFA report, claimed a 'chairman's privilege' to treat the vote as

> approval.

>

> The Observer has also learned that Monsanto received documents from

> the files of a Canadian senator involved in investigating controversies

> surrounding BST. Senator Mira Spivak stated that documents used in

> preparing hearings on BST were faxed from an office in the Canadian

> senate.

>

> Last month, Canada permanently banned BST after hearing testimony from

> research scientists in its health ministry, who challenged the hormone's

> safety. Monsanto, whose GM seeds will account for between 50 and 60 per

> cent of the US soya bean harvest this year, is prosecuting or has already

> settled 525 cases of what it calls seed piracy - farmers who fail to pay

> licence fees to plant Monsanto's Ready Roundup seeds.

>

> Settlements have amounted to tens of thousands of dollars.

>

> Monsanto has set up freephone tip lines across the US and Canada,

> encouraging neighbours to anonymously blow the whistle on neighbours, and

> has hired private investigators to follow up more than 1,800 of these

> leads. The technology use agreement that farmers must sign when buying

> Monsanto seed not only forbids them to save seed for replanting, it also

> gives Monsanto the right to come onto their land and take plant samples

> for three years.

>

> Hope Shand, research director for Rural Advancement Foundation

> International, said: 'Wherever in the world Monsanto is selling this I'd

> assume they will adopt the same draconian tactics.'

>

> In one case in western Canada, Monsanto is prosecuting a farmer who

> maintains he did not plant any genetically modified canola, but his crop

> was contaminated by GM seeds or pollen blown onto his field from nearby

> farms - the cross-pollination issue that so worries English Nature.

>

> One farmer said: 'Everyone's looking at each other and asking, '''Did

> my neighbour say something?'''

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...