Guest guest Posted June 1, 1999 Report Share Posted June 1, 1999 le wrote: > I just don't like to see these bitter debates >over conventional vs alternative treatments. In my opinion, they both >have thier pro's and con's, yet the Hatfield and McCoy mentality will >get us no where. Hi le and all, I feel that Pepper made a good point: that unfortunately, some med's/remedies take us into a catch 22 situation. Homeopathic remedies or other alternative therapies also have this situation in common. For example: better absorption of certain supplements require another in order to work to its full potential and/or require another yet, to balance its effects/side effects. The " debate " between homeopathic and traditional practices are a necessity in that they further educate us in what is available to us. Some of us are passionate about our beliefs, and this is good, IMO. The real hurdle to clear is to acknowledge that there are pro's and con's to both sides and that no one remedy is " 100% " and that we must judge them individually and apply them as we see fit. " Homeopathic vs traditional " is a great debate that appears every so often because there are great, knowledgeable people in our list, who strive to put out information for the good of all of us. It doesn't have to be Hatfields vs McCoys, it can be, however, a comfortable environment where one can freely post recommendations, experiences and exchange ideas so that it becomes truly a great learning experience for us all. Thus far, I have learned alot. :-) A great day to all. Ana Casinha, 34 Woodbridge, Ont. under deep, heavy clouds and humidity galore! :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.