Re: Digest Number 206/extraneous information

[Guest guest]

Hi all RLS'ers,

I go way back with , Jodi and many others. Unfortunately I very rarely

have the time to read the emails nowadays. Due to the fact that:

A. Many have to be downloaded. ( Takes time that so many of us just don't

have).

B. There truly is far too much extraneous information that really does not

relate to RLS. One example being, what category # our job is. Please,

please, if things do not relate to RLS, don't put them on the RLS digest.

Some of you enjoy reading unrelated information. I do too, in the right

place and time! Sadly it seems that much of it is unrelated to the reason

for this digest to begin with. I am sure that those of you who feel the need

to do this can find a way that does not have to affect those of us with time

limitations. It truly would be considerate of you. Maybe then there

wouldn't be as many digests to download. Speaking only for myself, I delete

90% of the ones to be downloaded before even reading them. This probably

means I miss a great deal of useful information. Today I take FULL

responsibility for this extraneous letter. I truly still want to be a

participant of the digest, not just an observer. At this point in the way it

is being used, I choose for the most part only to be an observer.

Best regards to all the " old timers " out there, and a hearty welcome to the

newcomers amongst all of us.

a (the limey).