Guest guest Posted March 25, 1999 Report Share Posted March 25, 1999 I'm ready for the furies to be directed in my direction, but here goes anyway. My take on the latest member to hit the dust is that he had no tact, not to mention literary skills, but there may have been something useful in what he had to say, or maybe not. The expression, " Don't shoot at unarmed men " comes to mind after reading his posts. I wrote Arthur a personal letter, in which I asked him to reconsider his decision to leave the group. I do NOT want to see this group restricted to people who only think the way I do. I'll learn nothing that way, and goodness knows I need to know all I can about this disorder, and about anything that might help alleviate the symptoms. I personally did not take offense at what he said. For some of us it's the truth, for others not. My main point here is that we don't need to send a warship in to bring down a boat with one oar, and considering that this " boat " is a human being, we might do better to offer him a tow back to shore. ne, 59, Lawrenceville, NJ ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 1999 Report Share Posted March 26, 1999 I am wondering, who do you perceive as having been trashed? Sharifa Vail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 1999 Report Share Posted March 26, 1999 I for one agree. We need to be able to listen to everyone. Even if we don't agree with what was said. COCO Mo. ne M Isbill wrote: > > > I'm ready for the furies to be directed in my direction, but here goes > anyway. My take on the latest member to hit the dust is that he had no > tact, not to mention literary skills, but there may have been something > useful in what he had to say, or maybe not. The expression, " Don't shoot > at unarmed men " comes to mind after reading his posts. I wrote Arthur a > personal letter, in which I asked him to reconsider his decision to leave > the group. I do NOT want to see this group restricted to people who only > think the way I do. I'll learn nothing that way, and goodness knows I > need to know all I can about this disorder, and about anything that might > help alleviate the symptoms. I personally did not take offense at what > he said. For some of us it's the truth, for others not. My main point > here is that we don't need to send a warship in to bring down a boat with > one oar, and considering that this " boat " is a human being, we might do > better to offer him a tow back to shore. > ne, 59, Lawrenceville, NJ > > ___________________________________________________________________ > You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. > Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html > or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > We are proud as punch of our new web site! > http://www.onelist.com > Onelist: The leading provider of free email community services > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This forum is for support only. The information posted to this List is for support purposes > and is not intended to replace the examination, diagnosis and treatment of a licensed > physician and no such claims are inferred. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 1999 Report Share Posted March 26, 1999 I also wanted to add to this that the person writing needs to be considerate of other peoples feelings too. To be nice about how things are said. COCO Mo. COCO wrote: > > > I for one agree. We need to be able to listen to everyone. Even if we don't agree with what > was said. COCO Mo. > > ne M Isbill wrote: > > > > > > > I'm ready for the furies to be directed in my direction, but here goes > > anyway. My take on the latest member to hit the dust is that he had no > > tact, not to mention literary skills, but there may have been something > > useful in what he had to say, or maybe not. The expression, " Don't shoot > > at unarmed men " comes to mind after reading his posts. I wrote Arthur a > > personal letter, in which I asked him to reconsider his decision to leave > > the group. I do NOT want to see this group restricted to people who only > > think the way I do. I'll learn nothing that way, and goodness knows I > > need to know all I can about this disorder, and about anything that might > > help alleviate the symptoms. I personally did not take offense at what > > he said. For some of us it's the truth, for others not. My main point > > here is that we don't need to send a warship in to bring down a boat with > > one oar, and considering that this " boat " is a human being, we might do > > better to offer him a tow back to shore. > > ne, 59, Lawrenceville, NJ > > > > ___________________________________________________________________ > > You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. > > Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html > > or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > We are proud as punch of our new web site! > > http://www.onelist.com > > Onelist: The leading provider of free email community services > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This forum is for support only. The information posted to this List is for support purposes > > and is not intended to replace the examination, diagnosis and treatment of a licensed > > physician and no such claims are inferred. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > We are proud as punch of our new web site! > http://www.onelist.com > Onelist: The leading provider of free email community services > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This forum is for support only. The information posted to this List is for support purposes > and is not intended to replace the examination, diagnosis and treatment of a licensed > physician and no such claims are inferred. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 1999 Report Share Posted March 26, 1999 All, We seem to not be able to get by without a controversy at least once a month. And Jill isn't even here to put her two cents worth in. For my part, I use the ideas that are helpful to me, appreciate the support, try to give support when I can, and use the " delete " key when necessary. Just a thought for us all: Build a bridge, not a barrier; Make a friend, not a fuss; Find a cause, not a controversy; Seek a solution, not a standoff. Jo from Mo, getting ready to head home next week from Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 1999 Report Share Posted March 26, 1999 ne, Louise, and Group, Being very tired these days, I might not should answer this, but I have started to 3 or 4 times and erased it. You don't hear from me a whole lot, so most of the time I just delete if i don't like it, but in this little " whoopla " , I feel compelled to finally speak up. If I am not badly mistaken, Arthur was the first one to do the trashing, and to tell us that what we thought was wrong and what he thought HAD to be RIGHT. OK, I didn't like that, but what the heck. If he wants to play God that's HIS problem, not mine. BUT, then someone in our group doesn't like it and we go after her like she's done something wrong. I've seen a lot of you go after other people in this group for a lot less and that was OK. How many times have we attacked ? Why was that OK and this isn't ? I'm not suggesting it's OK to attack ANYONE, but what about asking Arthur to understand how people feel about the things he said. In the same breath he apologized in, he said something about what he thought was right HAD to be right. Maybe this makes no sense and I've dreamed all of this, but to the best of my recollection, this is how I see it. Everyone has their right to their opinion, but this was more than just an opinion on Arthur's part. I am very confused as to whom or what we are supporting here. Ninette 50 TN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 1999 Report Share Posted March 26, 1999 Ninette, has both oars in the water. ne, 59, Lawrenceville, NJ ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 1999 Report Share Posted March 27, 1999 I am Very aware that " has both oars in the water " . That's my point. Why is it OK for us to jump his back so often, or anyone else in this group, and no one gets all " in a tizzy " , but then Arthur comes in and tells us how we should act, what we should do, and that EVERYTHING he says is right, without question, and we are just supposed to sit back and say - OK Don't confuse the people I am talking about. I was not " dogging " . and I have learned to disagree and I value his opinions highly. has never made statements like Arthur did, or if he has i will gladly stand corrected and I would be in disagreement there also. It's not just Arthur I'm questioning. It's why you attacked someone who did not like what Arthur said. SO WHAT. A lot of folks did not like what he said, there have only been a few who were brave enough to say so. Arthur did not give opinions on treatment or concern for what we go through. His was just the opposite. If we would just all follow his thinking, then everyone would be fine (according to Arthur). I could and did ignore what Arthur said until a very few of you felt like we should " support " Arthur, who was not supporting us, and " scold " members who are supporting us. Again I don't understand. Ninette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 1999 Report Share Posted March 27, 1999 I am Very aware that " has both oars in the water " . That's my point. Why is it OK for us to jump his back so often, or anyone else in this group, and no one gets all " in a tizzy " , but then Arthur comes in and tells us how we should act, what we should do, and that EVERYTHING he says is right, without question, and we are just supposed to sit back and say - OK Don't confuse the people I am talking about. I was not " dogging " . and I have learned to disagree and I value his opinions highly. has never made statements like Arthur did, or if he has i will gladly stand corrected and I would be in disagreement there also. It's not just Arthur I'm questioning. It's why you attacked someone who did not like what Arthur said. SO WHAT. A lot of folks did not like what he said, there have only been a few who were brave enough to say so. Arthur did not give opinions on treatment or concern for what we go through. His was just the opposite. If we would just all follow his thinking, then everyone would be fine (according to Arthur). I could and did ignore what Arthur said until a very few of you felt like we should " support " Arthur, who was not supporting us, and " scold " members who are supporting us. Again I don't understand. Ninette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 1999 Report Share Posted March 27, 1999 I am Very aware that " has both oars in the water " . That's my point. Why is it OK for us to jump his back so often, or anyone else in this group, and no one gets all " in a tizzy " , but then Arthur comes in and tells us how we should act, what we should do, and that EVERYTHING he says is right, without question, and we are just supposed to sit back and say - OK Don't confuse the people I am talking about. I was not " dogging " . and I have learned to disagree and I value his opinions highly. has never made statements like Arthur did, or if he has i will gladly stand corrected and I would be in disagreement there also. It's not just Arthur I'm questioning. It's why you attacked someone who did not like what Arthur said. SO WHAT. A lot of folks did not like what he said, there have only been a few who were brave enough to say so. Arthur did not give opinions on treatment or concern for what we go through. His was just the opposite. If we would just all follow his thinking, then everyone would be fine (according to Arthur). I could and did ignore what Arthur said until a very few of you felt like we should " support " Arthur, who was not supporting us, and " scold " members who are supporting us. Again I don't understand. Ninette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 1999 Report Share Posted March 27, 1999 Ninette, June, and Group, In a private post to Arthur, I declined his invitation to join a separate group with him and some others. I told him the value of this group was its diversity, and the sharing of these different ideas, opinions, and experiences. I also gave him a mini lecture on courtesy, tact, and consideration for people's feelings. I am not defending the way he went about communicating with us - it was ludicrous! I don't think anyone should be " attacked " . Maybe the problem here is that disagreement is confused with attack. I have always tried to express disagreement in a way that " attacks " the issue, not the person presenting it. I value 's participation and would feel awful if he interpreted my responses as putting him down personally. And of course you're right - he has never been as insulting as Arthur was! (, if you're still around, are you thoroughly sick of reading about yourself in the third person?!) Anyway, I hope you understand that I am glad you feel able to disagree with me, and I'm glad various other people here have a different take on various remedies than I do, and very selfishly, I want to be exposed to as many different ideas as possible. Maybe by trying something of everything, I can find some relief from this stupid, ridiculous, DISGUSTING condition! That's the only reason I would tolerate being insulted. In the other areas of my life, where I'm not in desperate straits, I'd be the first person to tell him to take a hike! I really don't care what he thinks of me personally - I just want to be able to use anything pertinent he may have to offer. Hope I haven't further confused the issue, and please know that I have never intended to respond in the attack mode. My apologies if it came across that way. ne, 59, Lawrenceville, NJ ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.