Personal and Private Messages

[Guest guest]

Hi Everyone,

My $0.02 worth - none of us (except Coco and

RainbowPed) know what was in the message " with an

attitude " - the conclusion reached that the message

had an attitude was " subjective " - we have only Coco's

opinion to go on. Not to mention the fact that we

don't know what she meant by an " attitude. "

And, by the way, we all have attitudes - sometimes

they may show up in our e-mails.

My opinion (which is simply that) is that Coco should

probably not send any more personal messages to

since she doesn't like his attitude, and that, if she

does, would be best off simply not to respond

to any more personal messages from this individual -

especially since she has threatened to make them

public if, in her opinion, they suggest an " attitude. "

I don't see anything wrong with what did - if

another member of the list sent me an e-mail message

telling me that if he/she judged my nest message to

her/him to have an " attitude " , I would post it to the

whole list also. What's the difference which one of

them went before the list first - this is stupid.

All of this strikes me as incredibly petty and

junvenile. This list has more personality conflicts

than any list I belong to - one conflict dies down and

aonther pops up. Are we all that thin-skinned and

fragile. Get a grip! We here to talk about and share

and support each with regard to RLS - everything else

is secondary.

Jane

If you all want me to unsub, I will. I'm just tired of

this kind of silly stuff going on - when there is a

serious problem we are supposed to be concerned about

... it's too much!

_____________________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

Right on the target, ne!

Ana Casinha, 34

Woodbridge, Ont.