Guest guest Posted July 20, 2000 Report Share Posted July 20, 2000 : I am a Social Worker working with veterans with mental illness and drug and alcohol problems. You're last post is completely incorrect and very discriminatory. All persons receiving SSI/D for a drug or alcohol problem were kicked off of it in 1996. This was a huge bureaucratic nightmare because, while not all persons with drug and alcohol problems have a serious mental illness, a large proportion of persons with SERIOUS mental illness (schizophrenia, rapid cycle bi-polar, etc.) also have a drug or alcohol problem (estimates vary by setting but range from 5% to almost 80% --the eighty percent is of the fequently hospitalizzed not the general MI population). This group are termed the dually-diagnosed. Some began to use drugs/alcohol to self-medicate and some were forced to live in drug infested mental health ghettos by a combination of deinstitutionalization and a cut in affordable housing, single resident occupancy units. Many of these dually diagnosed persons who quite honestly can not work except in work programs or supportive programs, lost their SSI/D in 1996 because the bureaucrats just cut people w/ drug or alcohol problems without looking at all their diagnoses. A psychiatrist told me he actually had a client commit suicide because he lost his benefits and was too overwhelmed to know what to do to get them back and didn't know how he could live without them. Furthermore, since this change in 1996, even persons with very legitimate, very disabling conditions SEPERATE from a substance abuse problem have a harder time getting SSI/D because anyone applying with a substance abuse history is held to a more stringent standard. People with mental illness have to face enough stigma as it is; please be sure you're info is accurate before you incite more stigma. Thank you. - Marti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2000 Report Share Posted July 20, 2000 Sorry Jeanie: I meant to address this post to . - Marti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2000 Report Share Posted July 21, 2000 Marti I am sorry if I offended you, and I was not being discriminatory. I worked for Child & Family Services in Knoxville before I started working in medical transportation. True, the government did take away the SSI from the alcoholics and addicts, but most of them [in Tennessee] got their SSI back. It may be totally different where you are, but I've worked with many of the addicts and they do indeed call their checks a crazy check. I did not imply that all of them are abusing the system. And many of the mental health patients truly had illness and deserved their checks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2000 Report Share Posted July 21, 2000 : I was not offended that you said many of them call their checks " crazy checks. " I've heard people use this phrase too. What was offensive, was your statement to the effect that it appeared easier for these people to get benefits than " people with a physical illness. " This comment placed a hierarchy of worthiness on disabilities and further stigmatized persons with mental illness by it's assumption that it's not a real illness. I would never want to have to choose a disability, or make a hierarchy of disabilities, but I have known literally hundreds of people with major mental illness and I would take even the most serious CMT any day over Schizophrenia or Mental Retardation. These people do have a physical illness! And, you may have gotten to know many of these people in your job capacity, which may have made the process " appear " easy. But for the individuals and the case workers helping them get benefits, I'm fairly sure that it was not easy. Also - I do know that, those who did get their checks back only did so because they also had a major mental illness or other serious illness. It is simply impossible to get the check back if they did not; if you know of any specific exceptions, I'd love to hear them because I have not met one in any state. Some of the illnesses are not immediately apparent, but they are there. Lastly, SSI does go to people with MR and folks previously considered " institutional " but lots of other people, including many with CMT, back troubles, etc. get SSI. - Marti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.