Guest guest Posted May 12, 2000 Report Share Posted May 12, 2000 In reference to the recent Medicaid posting and Dr. Rutledge's attitude: I read the post too, several times. From my understanding her insurance denied her the MGB/WLS. Then she was referred to Medicaid. Medicaid is secondary to her insurance. And besides, what does it matter as to whether it is Medicaid or not? Should Medicaid, Medicare, and Vocational Rehab patients not get same treatment as others? Is there something that would make them less important or less creditable? I have also to question the fact that Doctor's have a choice as to whether or not to accept Medicaid patients once they are so far into the process. Why advertise that you accept them, tell them they are approved, tell them the pay rate will be accepted, then tell them suddenly at the time of scheduling surgery, that he has decided not to do them? He plainly states that he would do the surgery for nothing because of how it helps people and makes them happy. Why would he say that in clinic in Jan of 2000? Then have the attitude in May of 2000 that Medicaid doesn't pay enough for him. That is very contradictory, and very disconcerting to me. Let me pose a hypothetical situation: single mother of two, no support from ex-husband who is nowhere to be found for three years going on four, works in an office, has no benefits, takes every penny she can to raise her children and keep from being sucked into nothingness - So, as a last resort, they become Medicaid recipients. Is this person any less deserving of an MGB than the rest of the group? Are they to be faulted because they went through the MGB process and requirements understanding that they have Dr. R's approval and then to get the point of scheduling the surgery, being treated by the office staff as if a surgery date is within the next two weeks, only to be told instead that Dr. Rutledge is not going to do anymore Medicaid for 6 to 9 months because it doesn't pay him enough and he has patients with 'real' insurance that are more important. I really want to know is this person not as good as the rest of you? Should their approval go to waste while the good Dr. R tends to his more important patients with 'real ' insurance? What if Medicaid will not issue a stay on the approval to hold it, for the length of time that this person is unimportant or they will not issue a second approval because the first went unused, and therefore, disproved medical need for the patient? Where does this person turn to now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2000 Report Share Posted May 12, 2000 Thank you Sue. I am not trying to bash - I promise, but I feel very betrayed by the very person that works so hard for all of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2000 Report Share Posted May 12, 2000 Allright O'Kelley!!! Well said! You go girl!!!! Sue(Maine) MGB Post-Op 4/17/00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2000 Report Share Posted May 12, 2000 OK, now I will flame a little!!! To the person who " scrimped and saved instead of using taxpayers money " . I am happy that you were able to do that. But, to a person who is in a catch 22 situation, such as can't work alot because of weight and health problems relating to it, Medicaid can save a life. ly I have worked since I was 16 years old and have always had taxes taken out, so one way or the other I PAID my Medicaid bill!! Dee in NC ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.