Guest guest Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 Hi Debora. DH sent me the text to the links you mentioned. I'm including a few lines because of a major question I have: Does she mean that the " supposedly better ...Asacol " is less effective than the original drug sulphasalazine (Azulfidine)? I think so - only thing that makes sense but want to be sure. I'll try to ask the GI but I know he'll tell me that because of where the CD is, and the studies on early intervention use, Imuran is still important. Also, where does Pentasa fit in - is it more like Asacol or the original drugs? Thanks so much. I don't have internet access, the time to get to library computers, or brain power due to bad insomnia. Take care, Fay Azulfidine and Asacol Elaine writes: Just got through reading a recent article from GUT, 2001, Vol. 248, which again reaffirms what has been obvious to me: that the older drug, salphasalzine (Azulfidine) which was replaced when the patent ran out with the supposedly better drug, Asacol, is less effective than the orginal drug .. http://www.breakingtheviciouscycle.info/knowledge_base/kb/azulfidine_and_ asacol.htm and http://www.healingcrow.com/ELF/ELF51.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.