Guest guest Posted August 9, 2002 Report Share Posted August 9, 2002 , The Nature's Science Calcium that so many of us use is an EXCELLENT product - so many of us wouldn't be using it otherwise. I buy mine from a vendor that I trust implicitly, someone who's done a lot of research and will only sell products that she believes in, whether it a supplement to keep us healthy or a candy bar that is " safe " for us. She's someone who would never stoop to the level of trashing another company's product in order to sell her own. She doesn't need to. Dan's advice was right on the money, " Someone else posed the thought on this in relation to your bloodwork but more importantly your dexascans. If you, and your labs, and your scans all have you in good health, then obviously you are not doing something wrong.......... " ------------------------------------------------ Terry Mayers 5DollarHosting.comT http://www.5dollarhosting.com http://www.5dollarhosting.com/> (877)-838-HOST / .... because it shouldn't cost a fortune to make a fortune! R Re: one more thing on calcium In a message dated 8/9/2002 3:20:21 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Graduate-OSSG writes: > a long time on the web last night researching this issue. Looks like I need > to take a whole lot more calcium than I've been taking to meet the > elemental calcium requirement. Just ordered some powdered calcium which > has a higher elemental calcium level than what I'm taking now. ****************************************** Kate, which powdered calcium would that be? I'm totally bummed about this because Nature's Science is the only calcium pill I can swallow. Thanks, in NJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 9, 2002 Report Share Posted August 9, 2002 Well, as for the dexascan, I had my first one about a month ago, and it showed mild osteopenia. Since it was my first, I have nothing to compare it to until next year. I want to nip it in the bud. The issue is not whether we need calcium, or how much or what kind, the issue was whether this particular manufacturer's labeling is misleading. I also implicitly trust the person who I got these from, the same person many of us get stuff from. However, I am wondering about the manufacturer because at the same time this thread started, my brother-in-law, who is a food scientist, had looked at the label, and also said that there's not as much elemental calcium in these as they imply. It's just the Nature's Science brand I'm talking about. So, that's why I'm just a little concerned. BUT, he also did say that " chelated " was a good thing. So, I will not give these up because they're the only calcium pill I've been able to swallow, but I may add in some of the powdered or liquid form as well. That's all. in NJ ******************************* In a message dated 8/9/2002 7:42:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Graduate-OSSG writes: > Dan's advice was right on the money, " Someone else posed the thought on this > in relation to your bloodwork but more > importantly your dexascans. If you, and your labs, and your scans all have > you in good health, then obviously you are not doing something > wrong.......... " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.