Guest guest Posted November 6, 2002 Report Share Posted November 6, 2002 Also from this month's issue of " Beyond Change " One of the tv news programs had a short report on this hormone/peptide several months ago. This article goes into it in more depth. The main thrust is that it is produces by cells that line the stomach and duodenum, the components that are bypassed by the RNY. Studies have shown that ghrelin injections cause rodents to gain weight and humans to experience intense feelings of hunger. One British study showed people injected with the hormone and allowed to eat freely at an open buffet, increased their food intakes by 30% Ghrelin production in the body rises prior to meals, signaling the appetite centers in the brain that the body needs food. It may also cause weight gain by altering metabolism. In lab animals it reduced the amount of fat used as fuel and causing it to be stored, resulting in obesity. A Danish study showed that dieting increases ghrelin levels in direct proportion to the amount of weigh loss; and a U of W study in Seattle showed a 25% increase in ghreling among people who'd lost an average of 17% of total body weight by dieting. No wonder we always gained back everything we lost, plus an extra 20 or 30 lbs!! (It is assumed that this hormone is the body's natural protection against starvation, and in leaner times was important for survival. No longer needed in this respect, due to plentiful food and little effort to obtain it). For those who have had RNY bypass, a previously unknown benefit is that the area where ghrelin is produced is no longer functional, and so ghrelin levels following bypass are suppressed, which may explain the powerful weight-reducing actions of the procedure, (lesser appetite, better maintenance of weight loss). In the same Seattle study, a comparison between patients who were dieting and bypass patients who'd lost 36% of total body weight, it was found that the ghrelin levels of bypass patients were 70 PERCENT below those of the dieters. Ghrelin was initially studied for its ability to stimulate growth hormone production, which increases muscle and bone mass and has good effects on the immune system. It would probably be a good idea to study whether the benefits of suppression on weight loss outweigh the drawbacks of losing bone mass. I'm now sittin' here wondering if this is one of the reasons why we seem so prone to getting osteoporosis............ Carol A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.