Guest guest Posted April 24, 2002 Report Share Posted April 24, 2002 Jerry I do not know where you live but I live in the northern part of Indiana MYhusband Ralph died 8 -23 - 01 and on his death certifcate is wrote SHY- DRAGER SYDROME AND FOR TIME HE WROTE YEARS Blanche Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2002 Report Share Posted April 24, 2002 : I agree with you actually, I think the primary cause of death should be listed as MSA because the other would never happen if he didn't have MSA. Here in CA they put a primary and a secondary cause of death, and they put Parkinson's and Shy-Drager for Ken, and then we found out later that he had DLBD not SDS. So, you see, the best intentions sometimes go astray. I do think though that the neurological progressive disease should be listed because statistics are compiled from the listed cause of death. Barbara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2002 Report Share Posted April 24, 2002 , In my previous employment,I was state registrar of vital records and director of public health statistics for the State of Indiana. I know from my expereinces there that physicians are notorious for failing to code the complete cause of death so that public health statistics will accurately reflect morbidity and mortality. The underlying causes - such as MSA - are the most critical to collect data for and also the most frequently under-reported. You are correct that the death certificate as it currently reads will influence mortality statistics for heart disease, and it will not impact statistics on neurological or movement disorders. Jerry Cash Question about death certificates... Hi All, We just picked up my dad's death certificate. The cause of death is listed as " cardiac dysarythmia " (sp?). There is no mention of MSA. There is a blank after the cause of death that says " as a consequence of " , but it was left blank. Logically, MSA could have been put in that blank. My question is this. Is it worth having the death certificate amended to reflect the MSA? I feel it should be there. As silly as it may sound, I think that the cause they listed makes his death sound too easy, (if that's possible). Listing MSA at least acknowledges his struggle. However, my real reason for wanting it on there is if it would make a difference somewhere down the road in terms of funding for research or something. Does anyone ever look at general statistics from death certificates? In other words, if more death certificates listed MSA as a cause of death, could it potentially make a difference when the powers that be are doling out funds for research? Am I even making any sense at all? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks! __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2002 Report Share Posted April 24, 2002 , In my previous employment,I was state registrar of vital records and director of public health statistics for the State of Indiana. I know from my expereinces there that physicians are notorious for failing to code the complete cause of death so that public health statistics will accurately reflect morbidity and mortality. The underlying causes - such as MSA - are the most critical to collect data for and also the most frequently under-reported. You are correct that the death certificate as it currently reads will influence mortality statistics for heart disease, and it will not impact statistics on neurological or movement disorders. Jerry Cash Question about death certificates... Hi All, We just picked up my dad's death certificate. The cause of death is listed as " cardiac dysarythmia " (sp?). There is no mention of MSA. There is a blank after the cause of death that says " as a consequence of " , but it was left blank. Logically, MSA could have been put in that blank. My question is this. Is it worth having the death certificate amended to reflect the MSA? I feel it should be there. As silly as it may sound, I think that the cause they listed makes his death sound too easy, (if that's possible). Listing MSA at least acknowledges his struggle. However, my real reason for wanting it on there is if it would make a difference somewhere down the road in terms of funding for research or something. Does anyone ever look at general statistics from death certificates? In other words, if more death certificates listed MSA as a cause of death, could it potentially make a difference when the powers that be are doling out funds for research? Am I even making any sense at all? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks! __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2002 Report Share Posted April 24, 2002 I don't have any answers, but it makes sense to me that somewhere they need to document cases/death rates to fight for more money to study this disease. Bill or Pam probably know more on funding issues. You ask some good questions though. My sympathy to you on the loss of your dad. Cindy B. Question about death certificates... > Hi All, > > We just picked up my dad's death certificate. The > cause of death is listed as " cardiac dysarythmia " > (sp?). There is no mention of MSA. There is a blank > after the cause of death that says " as a consequence > of " , but it was left blank. Logically, MSA could have > been put in that blank. > > My question is this. Is it worth having the death > certificate amended to reflect the MSA? I feel it > should be there. As silly as it may sound, I think > that the cause they listed makes his death sound too > easy, (if that's possible). Listing MSA at least > acknowledges his struggle. > > However, my real reason for wanting it on there is if > it would make a difference somewhere down the road in > terms of funding for research or something. Does > anyone ever look at general statistics from death > certificates? In other words, if more death > certificates listed MSA as a cause of death, could it > potentially make a difference when the powers that be > are doling out funds for research? Am I even making > any sense at all? Any thoughts would be appreciated. > > Thanks! > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2002 Report Share Posted April 25, 2002 Jerry & Melannie, This is nice to know. It is not something that I would of thought of. thanks, Liz (in El Centro) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.