Guest guest Posted August 8, 2002 Report Share Posted August 8, 2002 First I want to apologize to everyone for starting or restarting this whole debate over calcium citrate. The whole reason I posted the link to Dr Weil's article was that I was pleased to see that someone in the medical community is finally realizing that citrate is the calcium of choice (as opposed to Tums/chalk) What I can't understand is why Ray seems to be on such a witch hunt against the maker of the Nature's Science calcium. (and I think we all know who it is....) If the product that Ray sells is so superior....then it should stand head and shoulders above the rest on it's own merits. What do he have to gain by attacking one merchant in particular? Is he perhaps feeling threatened? Seems to me that our labs and dexascans give us a clue on whether what we are doing is good or bad. If the dexascan shows osteopenia and taking X mgs of XYZ product result in an improvement.....well that says something for the product, doesn't it? Just my $.02 worth Sue in Las Vegas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.