Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: 9-1 /2 Weeks Post-Op Progress Report - LONG

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Sherry- That is an amazing story. Personally I am glad you are losing but to

not have gotten your surgeon. I would have a hard time paying for that and I

would fight it. That is just me. I have aa 100cm and I am not unhappy about

it because I believe that absorption is better with 100cm. I know that I am

losing a little slower than some but I am losing. I think 60 pounds in 2

months is fabulous. I certainly could never have done that without surgery.

You are on your way and try to be positive. I know that you will just do

greta. Back to the Drs. That is very upsetiing. I wish you luck. Ellen(Pam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks very much, I appreciate the reply. I'm hoping to be able

to lose all my excess weight with the 100cm common channel, but

am not counting on it. Usually people who are as overweight as

I am need the shorter common channel length to acheive the same

results as those who are not quite as heavy starting out.

Thanks for the good thoughts.

-Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA)

BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001

self-pay

5'5 " / 359 pounds / 33 years old

Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts

Have lost 52 pounds since surgery!

Total of 61 pounds gone forEVER!

http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/

> Sherry- That is an amazing story. Personally I am glad you are

losing but to

> not have gotten your surgeon. I would have a hard time paying for

that and I

> would fight it. That is just me. I have aa 100cm and I am not

unhappy about

> it because I believe that absorption is better with 100cm. I know

that I am

> losing a little slower than some but I am losing. I think 60 pounds

in 2

> months is fabulous. I certainly could never have done that without

surgery.

> You are on your way and try to be positive. I know that you will

just do

> greta. Back to the Drs. That is very upsetiing. I wish you luck.

Ellen(Pam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks very much, I appreciate the reply. I'm hoping to be able

to lose all my excess weight with the 100cm common channel, but

am not counting on it. Usually people who are as overweight as

I am need the shorter common channel length to acheive the same

results as those who are not quite as heavy starting out.

Thanks for the good thoughts.

-Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA)

BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001

self-pay

5'5 " / 359 pounds / 33 years old

Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts

Have lost 52 pounds since surgery!

Total of 61 pounds gone forEVER!

http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/

> Sherry- That is an amazing story. Personally I am glad you are

losing but to

> not have gotten your surgeon. I would have a hard time paying for

that and I

> would fight it. That is just me. I have aa 100cm and I am not

unhappy about

> it because I believe that absorption is better with 100cm. I know

that I am

> losing a little slower than some but I am losing. I think 60 pounds

in 2

> months is fabulous. I certainly could never have done that without

surgery.

> You are on your way and try to be positive. I know that you will

just do

> greta. Back to the Drs. That is very upsetiing. I wish you luck.

Ellen(Pam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...