Re: a post about the new Kirkman enzyme

[Guest guest]

IWell said !

Mandi

> > (this clarifies incorrect info)

>

> Dave is wrong. I said, " Oh, I may have jumped the gun on the " no

> rice bran " . There is the possibility that it will contain rice

> bran. " and then said I would get back with them.

>

> If what was in the best interests of the children were the PRIMARY

> concern, not secondary or tertiary, then all this whoo-ha over the

> past year would not have happened. As it turns out, this happened

> because its was " forced " and " in spite of " all the resistance of the

> established industry and not because of it.

>

> Kirkman also has a new non-carbonate form of calcium after much

> argument that the carbonate was a wonderful form, but this group

> maintained it was not. Same with other things. Also, they previously

> had very unkind things to say about NEC but apparently have had a

> big change of heart. Since NEC has always manufactured Houston

> products, they are getting as close as possible to the real thing.

>

> I am not saying other companies should not improve their products,

> but after very close business associates have done their very best

> to block out all competition and favor one's company....and yet the

> enzyme option STILL persists, and then to toss in the towel and

> say " it is all for the poor little children... " this is unkind to

> the parents who have worked so hard over the past year to heal their

> children and others, and had to endure these business tactics of

> large companies and organizations.

>

> .

[Guest guest]

> (this clarifies incorrect info)

Dave is wrong. I said, " Oh, I may have jumped the gun on the " no

rice bran " . There is the possibility that it will contain rice

bran. " and then said I would get back with them.

If what was in the best interests of the children were the PRIMARY

concern, not secondary or tertiary, then all this whoo-ha over the

past year would not have happened. As it turns out, this happened

because its was " forced " and " in spite of " all the resistance of the

established industry and not because of it.

Kirkman also has a new non-carbonate form of calcium after much

argument that the carbonate was a wonderful form, but this group

maintained it was not. Same with other things. Also, they previously

had very unkind things to say about NEC but apparently have had a

big change of heart. Since NEC has always manufactured Houston

products, they are getting as close as possible to the real thing.

I am not saying other companies should not improve their products,

but after very close business associates have done their very best

to block out all competition and favor one's company....and yet the

enzyme option STILL persists, and then to toss in the towel and

say " it is all for the poor little children... " this is unkind to

the parents who have worked so hard over the past year to heal their

children and others, and had to endure these business tactics of

large companies and organizations.

.

[Guest guest]

> We are hoping that the focus will be on what is in the best

> interests of the children and let the business stuff not be part of

> the discussion.

My last note on this: I just went to the ARI site.

At the exact same time Dave H claims they want things to be focused

just on children and not business interests, his consultants (some

paid) are working hard to continuing tearing down any competition,

bashing parents, trying to stop enzyme science and development, and

stop the advances of people getting well with enzyme therapy.

It is important to remember that HNI has been the driving force and

innovator in all this. Enzyme development and research would just

drop if it weren't for that company. Something to keep in mind when

making purchasing decisions.

.