Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

letter between Dr H. and Dr Frick

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

See below

L. Frick, MD

Residency Program Director

Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery

Carolinas Medical Center

Re: 3 yo clubfoot patient

Hello Steve:

Regarding Grace Booth. The lateral x-ray of the right looks OK but

the

left is lacking DF. Is this a true stress x-ray? I think it would be

worth repeating the film with MD supervision to insure that it was

made

with a DF stress. You are describing a patient with a weak push off,

and

in this case, I would be loath to lengthen the Achilles again. If the

stress film shows true lack of DF, then I would consider two options:

Gradual distraction with Ilizarov or TSF versus posterior release and

capsulotomy. If I did the capsulotomy, I would keep her in cast for a

minimum amount of time to avoid getting stiff.(3-4 weeks only). The

ilizarov treatment might appeal to the internet parent who is open

surgery phobic....Ilizarov is a " Super cast " ..

Hope this is helpful.

Herzenberg, MD

>>> " Frick, " .Frick@...> 12/1/2004

10:03:03 AM >>>

Dear Dr Ponseti, and - hope you are well and enjoying the

holiday season. I met Grace Boothe yesterday, who is now about 3 and

a

half years old. She has bilat clubfoot, initially treated with below

knee casts in army system for 5 months, then by in Chapel

Hill

with a few casts and right tenotomy, then by Dr Ponseti with casts

and

bilateral tenotomies. She was in orthotic full time but then was cut

back because of concerns about ligamentous laxity and overcorrection.

She had a few followup visits with Herzenberg around age 2, and

mom

says she was worried then about the heels not being down but she said

she was given assurance that it was ok and would not be a problem.

She has had delayed milestones and is very short for her age- seems

to

be barrel chested to me with disproportionately large head and I

wonder

if she might have mild SED congenita- work up beginning now.

Her feet show bilateral rocker bottom deformity, right worse than

left,

with empty heel pads and abnormal contour of the heel. She walks with

a

stiff knee gait, wide abduction of limbs, and with midfoot and

forefoot

contact but no heel contact with the ground. She cannot run or jump.

I have attached copies of xrays of her feet. I would appreciate (and

her

parents would also) your thoughts/ comments about her feet and what

to

do now. My thoughts are that in some cases where children have

ligamentous laxity, the midfoot/forefoot ligaments give way during

casting before the tighter hindfoot ligaments and rocker bottom

develops. I have observed a few of these children after emailing Dr

Ponseti, and some have improved after beginning to walk, with the

heel

dropping down into the heel pad and ankle dorsiflexion improving

(rather

than only dorsifelxing through the midfoot). In a few cases, the

rockerbottom did not improve after a few months of walking, and I

have

done limited posterior tibiotalar and talocalcaneal arthrotomies with

very little to no addition lengthening of the Achilles. These few

cases

seem to be doing ok, and maybe have retained some motion at the

ankle/ST

joint because of their global propensity for laxity.

Should I proceed with posterior arthrotomy in Grace? Right side only

or

both? Can we work on providing Ponseti method practitioners with some

guidelines for when (if ever) you believe it is appropriate to

proceed

with surgery? The group (esp Internet parents) are so set against any

surgery that it is often difficult to even discuss with them. In

addition, there is a current " rage " of concern about 'whether or not

my

child has an atypical clubfoot " . I think of the atypical foot as the

ones that are short, broad and have plantaris instead of only first

ray

cavus.

Any thoughts/ideas appreciated. Thanks.

Steve

L. Frick, MD

Residency Program Director

Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery

Carolinas Medical Center

-----------------------------------------

This electronic message may contain information that is confidential

and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the

individual(s) and entity named as recipients in the message. If you

are

not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender

immediately and delete the material from any computer. Do not

deliver,

distribute or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or

take any action in reliance on the information it contains. Thank

you.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE LISTED

ABOVE.

This record has been disclosed in accordance with Subtitle 3 of

Title 4

of the Health-General Article of the Annotated Code of land.

Further disclosure of medical information contained herein is

prohibited.

If you are neither the intended recipient nor the individual

responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,

you

are hereby notified that any disclosure of patient information is

strictly

prohibited.

If you have received this email in error, immediately notify us by

telephone or return email.

-----------------------------------------

This electronic message may contain information that is confidential

and/or

legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual

(s)

and entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an

intended

recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and

delete

the material from any computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy

this

message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in

reliance on

the information it contains. Thank you.

| | | | | Inbox

Get the latest updates from MSN

MSN Home | My MSN | Hotmail | Search | Shopping

| Money | People & Chat

Feedback | Help

© 2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. TERMS OF USE

Advertise TRUSTe Approved Privacy Statement Anti-Spam Policy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 09:48 AM 1/12/2005, you wrote:

> The

>ilizarov treatment might appeal to the internet parent who is open

>surgery phobic....Ilizarov is a " Super cast " ..

That has rods poked into the child's foot and leg... ugh!

I don't understand this statement at all. I know it can work but

jeez... like one is *that* much better than the other. I would want to

know why and how and how long the Ilizarov device (it's not a cast, it's a

huge metal thing with metal rings around the leg and foot with rods poking

into the leg and foot and you adjust it to correct the CF, or something

like that - their are pictures online, search *Ilizarov*) would be used as

opposed to the capsulectomy (sp? is it an *ectomy?) which he says would be

a 3-4w cast. What are they going to do in the ankle capsule and why? What

does the Ilizarov device do instead and how is that better?

I'm also kinda weirded out about the reference to the *internet parent who

is open surgery phobic*. What does that say for us and how are we

different than any other parent who doesn't want surgery? More informed

about it I'm sure but why the distinction of an internet parent?

hummm...

Kori

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One person I know likened the internet to a big bathroom wall, full of graffiti.

This was years ago, but the same holds true today. Some stuff just isn't that

accurate. The doctor was probably referring to that tendency.

Re: letter between Dr H. and Dr Frick

At 09:48 AM 1/12/2005, you wrote:

> The

>ilizarov treatment might appeal to the internet parent who is open

>surgery phobic....Ilizarov is a " Super cast " ..

That has rods poked into the child's foot and leg... ugh!

I don't understand this statement at all. I know it can work but

jeez... like one is *that* much better than the other. I would want to

know why and how and how long the Ilizarov device (it's not a cast, it's a

huge metal thing with metal rings around the leg and foot with rods poking

into the leg and foot and you adjust it to correct the CF, or something

like that - their are pictures online, search *Ilizarov*) would be used as

opposed to the capsulectomy (sp? is it an *ectomy?) which he says would be

a 3-4w cast. What are they going to do in the ankle capsule and why? What

does the Ilizarov device do instead and how is that better?

I'm also kinda weirded out about the reference to the *internet parent who

is open surgery phobic*. What does that say for us and how are we

different than any other parent who doesn't want surgery? More informed

about it I'm sure but why the distinction of an internet parent?

hummm...

Kori

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One person I know likened the internet to a big bathroom wall, full of graffiti.

This was years ago, but the same holds true today. Some stuff just isn't that

accurate. The doctor was probably referring to that tendency.

Re: letter between Dr H. and Dr Frick

At 09:48 AM 1/12/2005, you wrote:

> The

>ilizarov treatment might appeal to the internet parent who is open

>surgery phobic....Ilizarov is a " Super cast " ..

That has rods poked into the child's foot and leg... ugh!

I don't understand this statement at all. I know it can work but

jeez... like one is *that* much better than the other. I would want to

know why and how and how long the Ilizarov device (it's not a cast, it's a

huge metal thing with metal rings around the leg and foot with rods poking

into the leg and foot and you adjust it to correct the CF, or something

like that - their are pictures online, search *Ilizarov*) would be used as

opposed to the capsulectomy (sp? is it an *ectomy?) which he says would be

a 3-4w cast. What are they going to do in the ankle capsule and why? What

does the Ilizarov device do instead and how is that better?

I'm also kinda weirded out about the reference to the *internet parent who

is open surgery phobic*. What does that say for us and how are we

different than any other parent who doesn't want surgery? More informed

about it I'm sure but why the distinction of an internet parent?

hummm...

Kori

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. There are several hot emotions about this topic. I think I may have

missed some posts on the topic (thanks Yahoo).

I understand that you are really frustrated about Grace's feet. You are

confused about which doctor to listen to and how to proceed with treatment.

Afraid of making the wrong choice....so many emotions. Understandably so. I

would

probably be pulling my hair out right now and I completely empathize with

you. I am sorry you are going through this. It must be extremely stressful.

All that said, I feel I must stick up for Dr. Frick. His letter may have

come across wrong or been taken wrong. I didn't find it offensive, but maybe

that's because we have been seeing him without any problems (other than his

sorry, rude receptionists). I don't think he intended to insult any one. Phobia

is

the fear of something..I believe that every parent here is afraid of surgery.

It carries a horrible stigma of lifelong difficulty, weakness and pain.

" Especially the internet parents " ...seeing that our group is called

Nosurgery4clubfoot...I can see how he came to that conclusion. and I do believe

that most

members (if not all) see surgery as a very negative thing that is to be

avoided if at all possible. Of course we are alot less open to the idea of

surgery

than a good percentage of other parents out there, we are educated and we

believe that surgery is avoidable for the most part.

Dr. Frick is a wonderful doctor. He is highly knowledgable about Ponseti's

method. I believe that it's wonderful that he took the time to consult the

other doctors. Many, many, many doctors would just say, " surgery's the answer,

when shall I schedule it? " Dr. Frick does care, and I believe he does his best

to avoid surgery if possible. It is definently a last choice for him. If he

said Kaitlin needed surgery, I would be saddened, possibly email Dr. Ponseti

(if Dr. Frick didn't do it himself), question this group and then

disapointingly schedule it.

Dr. Frick has told me that this group is a good thing for us to have. I have

discussed this group with him on several occasions during our visits. He

knows that I would not have found him if it wasn't for this group.

Once again, I am sorry about Grace's foot.

I do think the Dr. Frick is competent and that it is honorable that he

consulted the other doctors, including Dr. Ponseti about it. I don't think he

is

just casting to appease you...I think he optomistically hopes it will work, but

realisticly doubts it will. His own child has clubfoot, so I am sure he

understands your desire to take the least invasive and least traumatic route

possible and that is why he is willing to try casting first. Even if it is to

appease you, it may be that he wants you to be guiltlessly support surgery,

knowing

that you tried all other avenues first. He has been in our shoes...not many

doctors have. He really does care and I respect and trust him 1000%.

Freeman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...