Guest guest Posted March 12, 2001 Report Share Posted March 12, 2001 When I saw the table comparing mercury poisoning symptoms to autism (L Redwood paper), I decided immediately to pursue chelation. My son was 9 - there wasn't a moment to lose. Just my opinion: from everything I read, the damage from leaving it in his body was far greater than the risk of taking it out. At that time I had been chronically ill for 9 years, and when the doctor looked at the symptoms we both had and our history of mercury exposure, he promptly put both of us on a chelation schedule. He consulted with Dr. Bradstreet on the protocol. Our doctor has experience with toxic exposure, chelation and multiple chemical sensitivity, so we weren't starting from ground zero with him. However, he's not experienced with chelating children, so he counts on me to keep him informed in that regard. You probably already know that we're dealing with a lot more toxins than mercury. It's amazing and tragic how many poisons pour out of these kids when they chelate. CBS News last night reported on the brain damage from lead in inner city Baltimore children, blaming it for violence and learning disabilities. Regards, > , > Have or are you seiing Holmes or Bradstreet/Kartzinel to do this?? Glad > things are going well for your son. What was the deciding factors for you > in deciding to take the risk and go for it?? This is where I am at as I > embark on this next step. Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.