Guest guest Posted June 22, 2005 Report Share Posted June 22, 2005 Last Updated: June 22, 2005 NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer appears to be as safe as open resection, with some short- term outcomes actually better after the minimally invasive approach, according to a European trial reported in The Lancet Oncology published online on June 21st. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer has not been readily accepted, partly because of fears of cancer spread, note members of the multicenter COLOR (COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection) trial. In this trial investigators compared the outcomes of the two techniques used to treat patients with one adenocarcinoma localized in the caecum, ascending colon, descending colon or sigmoid colon and in whom distant metastases were ruled out. Included were 544 patients, median age 71 years, assigned a laparoscopic procedure and 551 assigned an open procedure between 1997 and 2003. During surgery, 91 in the laparoscopic group were converted to open surgery, primarily because of large and invasive cancer, but analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. The extent of resection did not differ between the groups, senior author Dr. H. Jaap Bonjer, with Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada, and colleagues report. Although laparoscopic surgery took significantly more time (median 145 minutes versus 115 minutes, p < 0.0001), there was significantly less loss of blood (100 mL versus 175 mL, p < 0.0001). Opioid analgesic use was lower in the laparoscopic group, and time to first bowel movement and postoperative discharge were shorter. The groups were similar in the number of positive resection margins identified microscopically and in the number of lymph nodes harvested (median number 10). There were no differences in adverse events or number of reinterventions 28 days after surgery between the two groups. The primary outcome, cancer-free survival after 3 years, will be reported later, the authors note. In the meantime, it appears that " laparoscopic surgery can be used for safe and radical resection of cancer in the right, left, and sigmoid colon. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2005 Report Share Posted June 22, 2005 I don't remember if I actually posted a similar article on this in files section. I think it might have been in LINK section too now that I rack my chemo brain. It was a video of the procedure and intereview with the patient who was back to work I think a week or two after the surgery. I asked my doc about it, and they didn't have anyone available who would do it at Fort Hood, but if I was really interested they would look around for someone. He did explain that it maybe was not a good idea for me. They need some room when doing that type of surgery so a person who is bigger is better risk that some one with reasonably small stomach. I did have my tubes ties back in 1975( with birth of last child) with this method. Had little band aid scar below my navel, stitches disolved.. Went home day early as well, as hubby was in hospital with messed up kidney; which they removed some 3 weeks later. Anyway I think it is great way to have surgery and sure beats the dern scar I have on my belly. Won't be wearing any bikini's anytime soon. LOL.. Jolene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 I went through it. Of course, I am big and the doctor had plenty of room to work . I was up and out of the hospital after my colon resection in 5 days (leaving behind 11 cm of colon). I was back at work the following week. I would have been back to work sooner but I had significant lung involvment and needed the time to get my lungs working well enough to leave the oxygen behind. I'm all for laparoscopic surgery whenever possible. -joe- > I don't remember if I actually posted a similar article on this in files > section. I think it might have been in LINK section too now that I > rack my chemo brain. It was a video of the procedure and intereview with > the patient who was back to work I think a week or two after the surgery. > I asked my doc about it, and they didn't have anyone available who would > do it at Fort Hood, but if I was really interested they would look > around for someone. He did explain that it maybe was not a good idea for > me. They need some room when doing that type of surgery so a person who > is bigger is better risk that some one with reasonably small stomach. I > did have my tubes ties back in 1975( with birth of last child) with this > method. Had little band aid scar below my navel, stitches disolved.. > Went home day early as well, as hubby was in hospital with messed up > kidney; which they removed some 3 weeks later. > Anyway I think it is great way to have surgery and sure beats the dern > scar I have on my belly. Won't be wearing any bikini's anytime soon. LOL.. > Jolene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.