Re: Concerns about chelation and having a baby

[Guest guest]

I'm no expert, but since you don't seem to be getting helpful replies yet, I'll

share what I

know. My husband and I are both interested in undergoing Andy's protocol, and

we're

both hoping to conceive (actually, our infertility is our motivation for doing

Andy's

protocol).

First, remember that the manufacture of sperm takes 3 months. Scientists can

analyze

sperm and (just like many other body tissues), find toxic exposures and vitamin,

EFA, and

mineral levels reflected in the sperm. Men with low zinc intake will have low

zinc in the

sperm, and vice versa (zinc is essential for either sperm or semen production; I

forget

which one). Same with selenium. Same with Arginine.

Unfortunately, the same is true with mercury. If you've got mercury in you,

you'll have

mercury in your sperm/semen. Hypothetically speaking, if your wife has a mercury

allergy,

her womb may fend off mercury-containing sperm/semen.

Whatever sperm you emit today will contain nutrients and contaminants

corresponding to

your nutrition and toxic body burden (mercury, lead, PCB, BPA, PFOA, etc.) of

three months

ago. Toxins a man may work with in his vocation can often result in all-girl

families, for

example, because certain contaminants he may be exposed to on a daily basis

basically

kills all his XY sperm, leaving only XX sperm, resulting in him having only

daughters. My

theory on that is that the toxin causing the problem has some sort of affinity

for

testosterone, which puts the XY sperms out of the picture. But again, I'm no

expert.

To learn more about this sort of phenomenon, check out www.ourstolenfuture.com.

My mercury-toxic husband and I have a two year old daughter. She is the great

joy of our

lives. We wish we hadn't waited as long as we had. She is generally healthy and

strong,

with a delightful personality and attractive looks. There are a few things about

her motor

development and temperament that concern us, and those could theoretically be

from his

mercury exposure. Or they could be because I never took any source of DHA/EPA

during

pregnancy. Who knows?

My advice? Go for it!!!! The blessing of motherhood and fatherhood is far

beyond

measure. I am not one of those people who says " wait until all toxic exposure is

eliminated first, before trying, " because we were meant to do this!! And far,

far too many

people figured they'd be able to try later, only to realize how wrong they were

once it's too

late.

Plus, God made our bodies such that there are protective measures against toxic

babies

being born. Hence, my and my husband's infertility. Such as, what I mentioned

before: a

woman's womb rejecting mercury-laden sperm out of an allergic reaction. Many

will call

me irresponsible, but we know the risks, and yet we're trying anyway, even

though we both

just got our fillings removed within the past 3 months. The reality for us is

that the

mercury in our bodies really shuts down the proper healthy function of our

reproductive

systems anyway (again, which is why we're turning to this protocol, to remedy

that)--his

libido is down, my cycles are way off, and even when our timing is perfect, we

don't

conceive . . . If our bodies do overcome the mercury-induced reproductive

malfunctions

and we are blessed to conceive (which is not very likely given my husband's

currently high

level of mercury toxicity), that will not remove one iota of hope we have for

that child to

enjoy a full and purposeful life. Because mercury-poisoning or no mercury

poisoning,

every conceived child is exposed to a plethora of toxins in the womb that we

probably

aren't even aware of yet, and if that child mangages to be born into our

industrialized

society, that baby will STILL be just as needed by the world and just as much a

blessing as

if there were never any toxins around.

I say, Enjoy your married life to the fullest, and don't voluntarily withold the

blessing of

motherhood from your wife just because of evil mercury. And remember: even if

you think

conception is in your control, it's not. It's in God's control. Even if you

never had any

amalgam fillings.

End of sermon

Abrenica

>

> Hello.

> In a previous post, I asked about chelation & having a baby and I was

> told (thank you)there was some Andy´s post in onibasu. Mainly, It was

> about to have a baby while a woman it´s on the protocol, but I would

> like to know, what about if only the man (me) is chelating and the

> woman have not a mercury problem. Is it better I stop chelation?. Now

> I am on 100mg DMSA and ALA after 2 years and a half from the begining.

>

> I look forward to any suggestion and recomendation becouse we want to

> have a baby as soon as posible.

>

> Thank you

>

> Fran.

>

[Guest guest]

I'm no expert, but since you don't seem to be getting helpful replies yet, I'll

share what I

know. My husband and I are both interested in undergoing Andy's protocol, and

we're

both hoping to conceive (actually, our infertility is our motivation for doing

Andy's

protocol).

First, remember that the manufacture of sperm takes 3 months. Scientists can

analyze

sperm and (just like many other body tissues), find toxic exposures and vitamin,

EFA, and

mineral levels reflected in the sperm. Men with low zinc intake will have low

zinc in the

sperm, and vice versa (zinc is essential for either sperm or semen production; I

forget

which one). Same with selenium. Same with Arginine.

Unfortunately, the same is true with mercury. If you've got mercury in you,

you'll have

mercury in your sperm/semen. Hypothetically speaking, if your wife has a mercury

allergy,

her womb may fend off mercury-containing sperm/semen.

Whatever sperm you emit today will contain nutrients and contaminants

corresponding to

your nutrition and toxic body burden (mercury, lead, PCB, BPA, PFOA, etc.) of

three months

ago. Toxins a man may work with in his vocation can often result in all-girl

families, for

example, because certain contaminants he may be exposed to on a daily basis

basically

kills all his XY sperm, leaving only XX sperm, resulting in him having only

daughters. My

theory on that is that the toxin causing the problem has some sort of affinity

for

testosterone, which puts the XY sperms out of the picture. But again, I'm no

expert.

To learn more about this sort of phenomenon, check out www.ourstolenfuture.com.

My mercury-toxic husband and I have a two year old daughter. She is the great

joy of our

lives. We wish we hadn't waited as long as we had. She is generally healthy and

strong,

with a delightful personality and attractive looks. There are a few things about

her motor

development and temperament that concern us, and those could theoretically be

from his

mercury exposure. Or they could be because I never took any source of DHA/EPA

during

pregnancy. Who knows?

My advice? Go for it!!!! The blessing of motherhood and fatherhood is far

beyond

measure. I am not one of those people who says " wait until all toxic exposure is

eliminated first, before trying, " because we were meant to do this!! And far,

far too many

people figured they'd be able to try later, only to realize how wrong they were

once it's too

late.

Plus, God made our bodies such that there are protective measures against toxic

babies

being born. Hence, my and my husband's infertility. Such as, what I mentioned

before: a

woman's womb rejecting mercury-laden sperm out of an allergic reaction. Many

will call

me irresponsible, but we know the risks, and yet we're trying anyway, even

though we both

just got our fillings removed within the past 3 months. The reality for us is

that the

mercury in our bodies really shuts down the proper healthy function of our

reproductive

systems anyway (again, which is why we're turning to this protocol, to remedy

that)--his

libido is down, my cycles are way off, and even when our timing is perfect, we

don't

conceive . . . If our bodies do overcome the mercury-induced reproductive

malfunctions

and we are blessed to conceive (which is not very likely given my husband's

currently high

level of mercury toxicity), that will not remove one iota of hope we have for

that child to

enjoy a full and purposeful life. Because mercury-poisoning or no mercury

poisoning,

every conceived child is exposed to a plethora of toxins in the womb that we

probably

aren't even aware of yet, and if that child mangages to be born into our

industrialized

society, that baby will STILL be just as needed by the world and just as much a

blessing as

if there were never any toxins around.

I say, Enjoy your married life to the fullest, and don't voluntarily withold the

blessing of

motherhood from your wife just because of evil mercury. And remember: even if

you think

conception is in your control, it's not. It's in God's control. Even if you

never had any

amalgam fillings.

End of sermon

Abrenica

>

> Hello.

> In a previous post, I asked about chelation & having a baby and I was

> told (thank you)there was some Andy´s post in onibasu. Mainly, It was

> about to have a baby while a woman it´s on the protocol, but I would

> like to know, what about if only the man (me) is chelating and the

> woman have not a mercury problem. Is it better I stop chelation?. Now

> I am on 100mg DMSA and ALA after 2 years and a half from the begining.

>

> I look forward to any suggestion and recomendation becouse we want to

> have a baby as soon as posible.

>

> Thank you

>

> Fran.

>

[Guest guest]

I'm no expert, but since you don't seem to be getting helpful replies yet, I'll

share what I

know. My husband and I are both interested in undergoing Andy's protocol, and

we're

both hoping to conceive (actually, our infertility is our motivation for doing

Andy's

protocol).

First, remember that the manufacture of sperm takes 3 months. Scientists can

analyze

sperm and (just like many other body tissues), find toxic exposures and vitamin,

EFA, and

mineral levels reflected in the sperm. Men with low zinc intake will have low

zinc in the

sperm, and vice versa (zinc is essential for either sperm or semen production; I

forget

which one). Same with selenium. Same with Arginine.

Unfortunately, the same is true with mercury. If you've got mercury in you,

you'll have

mercury in your sperm/semen. Hypothetically speaking, if your wife has a mercury

allergy,

her womb may fend off mercury-containing sperm/semen.

Whatever sperm you emit today will contain nutrients and contaminants

corresponding to

your nutrition and toxic body burden (mercury, lead, PCB, BPA, PFOA, etc.) of

three months

ago. Toxins a man may work with in his vocation can often result in all-girl

families, for

example, because certain contaminants he may be exposed to on a daily basis

basically

kills all his XY sperm, leaving only XX sperm, resulting in him having only

daughters. My

theory on that is that the toxin causing the problem has some sort of affinity

for

testosterone, which puts the XY sperms out of the picture. But again, I'm no

expert.

To learn more about this sort of phenomenon, check out www.ourstolenfuture.com.

My mercury-toxic husband and I have a two year old daughter. She is the great

joy of our

lives. We wish we hadn't waited as long as we had. She is generally healthy and

strong,

with a delightful personality and attractive looks. There are a few things about

her motor

development and temperament that concern us, and those could theoretically be

from his

mercury exposure. Or they could be because I never took any source of DHA/EPA

during

pregnancy. Who knows?

My advice? Go for it!!!! The blessing of motherhood and fatherhood is far

beyond

measure. I am not one of those people who says " wait until all toxic exposure is

eliminated first, before trying, " because we were meant to do this!! And far,

far too many

people figured they'd be able to try later, only to realize how wrong they were

once it's too

late.

Plus, God made our bodies such that there are protective measures against toxic

babies

being born. Hence, my and my husband's infertility. Such as, what I mentioned

before: a

woman's womb rejecting mercury-laden sperm out of an allergic reaction. Many

will call

me irresponsible, but we know the risks, and yet we're trying anyway, even

though we both

just got our fillings removed within the past 3 months. The reality for us is

that the

mercury in our bodies really shuts down the proper healthy function of our

reproductive

systems anyway (again, which is why we're turning to this protocol, to remedy

that)--his

libido is down, my cycles are way off, and even when our timing is perfect, we

don't

conceive . . . If our bodies do overcome the mercury-induced reproductive

malfunctions

and we are blessed to conceive (which is not very likely given my husband's

currently high

level of mercury toxicity), that will not remove one iota of hope we have for

that child to

enjoy a full and purposeful life. Because mercury-poisoning or no mercury

poisoning,

every conceived child is exposed to a plethora of toxins in the womb that we

probably

aren't even aware of yet, and if that child mangages to be born into our

industrialized

society, that baby will STILL be just as needed by the world and just as much a

blessing as

if there were never any toxins around.

I say, Enjoy your married life to the fullest, and don't voluntarily withold the

blessing of

motherhood from your wife just because of evil mercury. And remember: even if

you think

conception is in your control, it's not. It's in God's control. Even if you

never had any

amalgam fillings.

End of sermon

Abrenica

>

> Hello.

> In a previous post, I asked about chelation & having a baby and I was

> told (thank you)there was some Andy´s post in onibasu. Mainly, It was

> about to have a baby while a woman it´s on the protocol, but I would

> like to know, what about if only the man (me) is chelating and the

> woman have not a mercury problem. Is it better I stop chelation?. Now

> I am on 100mg DMSA and ALA after 2 years and a half from the begining.

>

> I look forward to any suggestion and recomendation becouse we want to

> have a baby as soon as posible.

>

> Thank you

>

> Fran.

>

[Guest guest]

I can tell you that any body fluids will contain mercury before and

during chelation and for a certain number of months afterwards.

They don't recommend a woman get pregnant for at least 18 months post

chelation. It takes 18 months for body levels of metals to drop low

enough.

As to where this falls for a man...it is likely he would also have

mercury floating around for a while after he stops chelation too. I

can't see why a man would be different. And yes, mercury is in sperm.

Someone on A-M tested that long ago.

If you are planning to conceive, you would definitely need to stop

chelation. If it were me, I'd probably wait at a year minimum. 18

months if you can spare it. To be sure my body was done dumping

and/or that blood levels had settled.

Sorry, I wish it could be today...it's hard to wait, but well worth

having a healthy child.

>

> Hello.

> In a previous post, I asked about chelation & having a baby and I was

> told (thank you)there was some Andy´s post in onibasu. Mainly, It was

> about to have a baby while a woman it´s on the protocol, but I would

> like to know, what about if only the man (me) is chelating and the

> woman have not a mercury problem. Is it better I stop chelation?. Now

> I am on 100mg DMSA and ALA after 2 years and a half from the begining.

>

> I look forward to any suggestion and recomendation becouse we want to

> have a baby as soon as posible.

>

> Thank you

>

> Fran.

>

[Guest guest]

>

> I can tell you that any body fluids will contain mercury before and

> during chelation and for a certain number of months afterwards.

> They don't recommend a woman get pregnant for at least 18 months post

> chelation.

I'm just curious to know who " they " is, where did your information

come from?

J

It takes 18 months for body levels of metals to drop low

> enough.

>

>