Re: Concerns about chelation and having a baby, any opinions Andy??

[Guest guest]

-- In frequent-dose-chelation , " jennifer.robinsong "

wrote:

>

> Many will call

> me irresponsible, but we know the risks, and yet we're trying

anyway, > even though we both

> just got our fillings removed within the past 3 months.

I was too busy to respond at the time that this post came in.

While amalgams are in place and the body is getting a daily, steady

burden of mercury from the amalgam vapor, it can't do much to try to

get rid of the excessive body burden. When amalgams are removed and

that daily dose stops the body *starts* to recover a little bit. At

about 3 months after amalgam removal mercury starts to dump out of

organs. When this happens the free mercury doesn't necessarily leave

the body. There WILL be mercury roaming around in the body during

this time and it would not be a good time to conceive.

For the sake of the fetus, it would not be a good idea to conceive

during the period shortly after amalgam removal. I don't think anyone

would know how long after amalgam removal it would be safe (for the

fetus) to conceive. I would look for opinions from Andy Cutler

because he has educated himself on all aspects of toxicity and chelation.

It certainly is not safe (for the fetus) to conceive during chelation

when there will be mercury moving around for certain. I wanted to

make it clear that in the frequent-dose-chelation group we advise

against conception during chelation.

Anyone who is at an age where they could possibly conceive, and is

chelating, would be wise to use extra birth control measures if they

are sexually active.

I wanted to clarify that point in case there was any confusion.

J