Re: Mercury and Autism link debunked... You've got to be kidding...

January 15, 2008

>

> What kind of " science " is this study based on?

It's not based on science - it's based on the need for profits and to

avoid litigation of pharmaceutical companies.

Some comments:

..pdf

J

> AID=/20080112/GJLIFESTYLES_01/943796742/-1/FOSLIFESTYLES

>

> Proving that mercury isn't a cause by an increase of autism in

> children who recieved imunizations not containing mercury is just

> pure insanity. The logic they are using in this case boggles my mind.

>

> Do I think it's the cause of all Autism, no, but do I think it is a

> cause yes. In fact the article points to a comment from the

> study " These time trends are inconsistent with the hypothesis that

> thimerosal exposure is a primary cause of autism in California " .

> Notice they didn't say it was not a cause of autism, but not the

> primary one. So if we were to follow their broken logic in this

> study then they are basically admiting that mercury is indeed a

> cause, but not a primary one.

>

> Can't have it both ways folks.

>

> Sorry, for the rant, but I'm sure Andy has already commented

> elsewhere. The internet is ablaze with folks saying " see we told you

> imunizations aren't a cause " based on this study. Ugg!

>

> Mike

>

Recommended Posts