Guest guest Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 I've been studying synthetic estrogen activity and found quite a list of contraindications are listed on the flyer included with my 'patch' systems that weren't listed in the past, including but not limited to: " exacerbation " of hepatic hemangiomas (two large ones were found via CAT scan 5 yrs ago), migraine, dementia, fluid retention, breast tenderness & fibrocystic disease (mine are called 'calcifications' ), IBS/constipation, bloating, thyroid problems (mine include Hashimoto's/ very high antibody titers), increased thyroid-binding & sex binding hormones, arthralgias (osteoarthritis & bursitis), immune weakness, etc. Although they haven't affected me (to my knowledge), heart problems, glucose/insulin problems, & venous issues/stroke risk are also listed. One can't help but notice this list is quite similar to that associated with amalgam toxicity. --Joanne ~~~~~~~~~~~ I am so glad that you have discovered the terrible effects of synthetic hormones! When I was looking into them, I was lucky enough to come up on the information you have posted regarding their ill effects on our bodies. I could not believe that doctors would even prescribe them after knowing this information. Anyhow, there is a support group for hormone-related issues here on Yahoo. The address is: HormonesandHealth-Naturally clued me into this group, so " hat tip " to her. My feeling is that natural hormones are the best for our bodies, because they are recognized by the receptor cells, and they perform very similarly to our natural hormones. I'm not sure of the effect and Hg, but my guess would be that there is a connection. I feel that my progesterone levels have risen in the last few months of chelation, so it would not be a big leap to guess that my estrogen levels are rising, as well. These are just educated guesses, as I am not able to test at this time. --------------------------------- Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 Thanks. In all honesty, I doubt many doctors have the time required to read all the fine print that now comes with synthetic ERT. Because I'd had a child recently, everything started with an OB who probably didn't get into great depth with gynecology/surgically induced menopause issues. Without " parts " to worry about, I only saw MD's during the early years on medication. None referred me to a specialist despite the problems, but when I found a female OB/Gyn, she didn't know any more than the rest of them. I remember PPO physician lists, narrowed down by doctors actually accepting new patients and within reasonable driving distances, making it difficult to get help, too. From the pharmacy, I receive 3 levels of info: one is a simple computer printout (and you'd never guess it's only hinted at a couple of the possible effects of the medication), the second is a little more detailed from the manufacturer, also easy to read, found on the flip side of application info (which you wouldn't look at once you get started). The 3rd unfolds to a huge sheet. It's detailed, includes technical lingo, in a barely legible type size, with some sections including some problems to be aware of (so if you find one of them & read it you'll think you've found it all). There's 3-4 more related sections scattered in, each having both common & different potential health consequences discussed. It could be worse & be like my Cytomel - coming with no info beyond the pharmacy's simple, minimal printout once a year. Apparently our protection rests with our own ability to both take the time and to study the pharmaceuticals in depth. Now I feel like I'm ready to tackle a class in organic chemistry and certainly wish I had a long time ago. I did speak with my compounded pharmacist, who said synthetic estradiol is the only form of that particular estrogen and it's what goes into the compounded versions. Joanne > > I've been studying synthetic estrogen activity and found quite a > list of contraindications are listed on the flyer included with > my 'patch' systems that weren't listed in the past, including but > not limited to: " exacerbation " of hepatic hemangiomas (two large > ones were found via CAT scan 5 yrs ago), migraine, dementia, fluid > retention, breast tenderness & fibrocystic disease (mine are > called 'calcifications' ), IBS/constipation, bloating, thyroid > problems (mine include Hashimoto's/ very high antibody titers), > increased thyroid-binding & sex binding hormones, arthralgias > (osteoarthritis & bursitis), immune weakness, etc. Although they > haven't affected me (to my knowledge), heart problems, > glucose/insulin problems, & venous issues/stroke risk are also > listed. One can't help but notice this list is quite similar to > that associated with amalgam toxicity. > > --Joanne > ~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > I am so glad that you have discovered the terrible effects of synthetic hormones! When I was looking into them, I was lucky enough to come up on the information you have posted regarding their ill effects on our bodies. I could not believe that doctors would even prescribe them after knowing this information. Anyhow, there is a support group for hormone-related issues here on Yahoo. > > The address is: HormonesandHealth-Naturally > > clued me into this group, so " hat tip " to her. > > My feeling is that natural hormones are the best for our bodies, because they are recognized by the receptor cells, and they perform very similarly to our natural hormones. > > I'm not sure of the effect and Hg, but my guess would be that there is a connection. I feel that my progesterone levels have risen in the last few months of chelation, so it would not be a big leap to guess that my estrogen levels are rising, as well. These are just educated guesses, as I am not able to test at this time. > > > > > --------------------------------- > Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 Did you say that you had recently had a child? Are you Rh negative? If so, did you have a Rho-Gam shot? I ask because they contain mercury. I was kind of confused by your post, because it sounds like you had your uterus removed?(Not to be nosy, just clarifying) Anyhow, when I discovered that the Rho-gam shot had mercury in it, the pieces of the puzzle started coming together, as far as my slow decline in health. An internist that I was seeing had made the comment that there was a connection between hypothyroidism and women who've borne children. Well, duh...did it not occur to her that there may be a deeper reason behind women who've given birth and hypothyroidism (such as being poisoned with mercury??) --------------------------------- Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.