Guest guest Posted December 25, 2002 Report Share Posted December 25, 2002 Margaret, It's a large online community for support through conception and pregnancy and on to raising children. The focus, though, is on trying to conceive. There are seperate chat boards set up for people in different situations. One of them is for people who have thyroid problems. Most of the girls are hypo, but I do see the occassional Graves girl. I don't participate on it too much as it's sort of a slow board, but I check it from time to time and if I see a Graves person, I say hi and direct them here and tell them to make sure they look into all their options on their own before letting a doctor direct the to one without going in depth. I had a baby at the end of 2000 who I lost. Since then my husband and I have been trying again to no avail. I did have one miscarriage in February... Anyway my Graves we undiagnosed at the time. We saw a specialist and we both came out looking fine, reproductively. I have normal cycles and ovulate on my own and everything. We thought it was the stress from losing Riley still affecting us. And then we found out that I have Graves again (likely brought on by my pregnancy I'm told). Anyway for now we're not on birth control, but we're not officially trying as I get situated on my meds. But I have an appointment on Monday with my doctor to talk about going back to my fertility specailist and picking up where we left off. Hope that helped though it was more than you asked for =) Merry Christmas! Clair > > Hello, > > > > You can read my story and see pictures of me before and after RAI > at the URL > > below! > > > > God bless, > > > > HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html " > >http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2002 Report Share Posted December 26, 2002 Clair! I am glad I found you too! Feel free to share my webpage with anyone that you think it would help! Thank you for your well wishes.......right back at ya! Two of my friends from Bible study who have had fertility issues and IVFs have just become pregnant...and I am praying for the same thing for you! God bless, http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.htmlhttp://ho\ metown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2002 Report Share Posted December 26, 2002 Clair, So sorry to hear about all of your troubles conceiving. I hope things work out soon for you. Are you trying to conceive on PTU? If so, can you tell me exactly what the risks are? All I hear is that they are small but I need more details so that I can decide what to do. I just talked to my gynecologist today who I love. She is very open minded about alternative medicine, nutrition and is up to date on European medicine. My husband is Dutch and I just talked to her about medical care in England. Unlike most doctors in the US who think European medicine in awful, she staunchly defended it. Anyway, today she also told me that I needed to do RAI. I tried to explain to her that I didn't want to and that I had heard from allot of people that they never felt good again. Of course she didn't listen but hinted that I was irresponsible to put my baby at risk. She also said that there was a small risk of my baby developing hypothyroidism but she couldn't say how small or if it would be permanent or temporary. Anyway, if you have heard anything different from your doctor I would love to hear it. thanks, Margaret Re: PTU vs. RAI Margaret, It's a large online community for support through conception and pregnancy and on to raising children. The focus, though, is on trying to conceive. There are seperate chat boards set up for people in different situations. One of them is for people who have thyroid problems. Most of the girls are hypo, but I do see the occassional Graves girl. I don't participate on it too much as it's sort of a slow board, but I check it from time to time and if I see a Graves person, I say hi and direct them here and tell them to make sure they look into all their options on their own before letting a doctor direct the to one without going in depth. I had a baby at the end of 2000 who I lost. Since then my husband and I have been trying again to no avail. I did have one miscarriage in February... Anyway my Graves we undiagnosed at the time. We saw a specialist and we both came out looking fine, reproductively. I have normal cycles and ovulate on my own and everything. We thought it was the stress from losing Riley still affecting us. And then we found out that I have Graves again (likely brought on by my pregnancy I'm told). Anyway for now we're not on birth control, but we're not officially trying as I get situated on my meds. But I have an appointment on Monday with my doctor to talk about going back to my fertility specailist and picking up where we left off. Hope that helped though it was more than you asked for =) Merry Christmas! Clair > > Hello, > > > > You can read my story and see pictures of me before and after RAI > at the URL > > below! > > > > God bless, > > > > HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html " > >http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 Hi Margaret. I was debating sending this, waiting for someone more qualified, but decided to anyway and hope it answers more questions than it raises. It's totally off the cuff so I'm sure I've forgotten something important. These are the factors that would inform my decision were I in this situation. > Anyway, today she also told me that I needed to do RAI. She may have a European approach but she's not an endo. I'll bet she's also not a reproductive endo who might be useful (but not necessary) to consult. She also > said that there was a small risk of my baby developing > hypothyroidism but she couldn't say how small or if it would be > permanent or temporary. Is this is a risk post RAI? With proper monitoring you shouldn't worry. I know many women with hypothyroidism who've had successful pregnancies. Perhaps it's because their hypoT wasn't RAI induced and so was easier to manage. If she's referring to this happening while being on PTU during pregnancy, a) you'd be on a very low dose, an experienced dr. knows how to monitor mother and baby to reduce the risk. The riskiest aspects to babies when their pregnant mothers have thyroid problems are - if the mother has active GD - miscarriage. Which is why it's best to wait till the hyperT is controlled and only a low dose of PTU is needed. This is also good for the mother's emotional health. Coming on the heels of (possibly multiple) miscarriages, to do otherwise is too potentially heartbreaking. - if the mother is hypothyroid and isn't getting adequate replacement hormone, perhaps because of a dr. who relies on TSH, and a too-high-as-normal TSH at that. - side effects of ATD's on the fetus, which is uncommon. The women who've been through this will have tips and encouraging words. - if the mother's GD becomes active during pregnancy thyroidectomy may be necessary but this too is uncommon because often GD eases up during pregnancy. (There are, of course, some post-pregnancy considerations, since it's possible the GD will come back - nursing, contraception, e.g.) Have a pleasant weekend, Fay ________________________________________________________________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 Margaret, Here is a copy of a past post for you. -Pam L- ****************** I noticed the question comes up off and on, about new women being diagnosed with hyper / Graves' , and they want to be starting a family, so choosing a treatment is even more complicated. Recently over at About.com, the same question came up again, and Elaine has posted such a great bunch of replies, I have asked, and been given permission to share her posts over here for our group. Following are only here replies to the original poster. Thank You so much Elaine ! -Pam L- ********************************** Wanting to do something fast is sort of symtomatic in GD. Most people are anxious and impatient and want a quick fix. RAI won't necessarily do this because it causes an elevation of the antibodies that cause Graves' disease. These antibodies can be passed on to your fetus during pregnancy and cause neonatal GD. So while the American Society of Nuclear Medicine recently advised waiting 1 year after RAI to get pregnant, you would still have to be carefully monitored. PTU can be safely used in pregnancy. The goal of PTU is to both reduce your thyroid hormone levels and slow your immune system down so that it keeps producing the antibodies that cause GD. Not all doctors in the United States are familiar with its use, but the drug, if kept at the low dose needed for maintenance, can be used successfully. Then again, since your GD is probably related to the post-partum period from your first child, you could easily be in remission before you get pregnant again. High thyroid hormone levels will cause changes in your menstrual cycle. Once your levels are brought down into the normal range with the meds, periods generally resume. People who are nursing also generally notice a reduction in thyroid hormone levels when they stop. See my reply to Newly Diagnoses and Scared regarding interpreting what your thyroid hormone levels mean. And see the page on pregnancy and childbirth on my web site, http://daisyelaine_co.tripod.com/gravesdisease/ Take care, Elaine Elaine , Author ************** Usually, if you're going to have problems with PTU, it occurs within the first 4 weeks and it's because of an individual idiosyncratic reaction you have to the meds. So it's unlikely that you would be on it during pregnancy and then need to be taken off of it. Also, during the first trimester of pregnancy, even normal people have a small spike in their thyroid hormone levels. This isn't usually enough to make you have your meds raised. However, during the second half of pregnancy your immune system slows down and estrogens cause your thyroid levels to fall. So most everyone who is on an anti-thyroid drug needs to have their dose reduced. Most sources say that keeping your levels of PTU below 200 mg/daily is safe but most people can be maintained on 100-150 mg of PTU. I'd make sure I was taking the lowest dose I needed because hypothyroidism causes more problems with both fertility and pregnancy than hyperthyroidism does. But you'd have to make sure you were seeing a doc who had experience using ATDs and who ran the right lab tests. You'd have to request copies of your labs and stay on top of things. Of course, if you have RAI and become hypothyroid, you'll have fluctuating thyroid levels for several years so you'll also have to do this to guarantee the best outcome. People have been using PTU safely in pregnancy for over 50 years and there have been lots of studies done that back its safety. However, I met one woman on these board who did not have a good outcome using one of the anti-thyroid drugs during pregnancy. Many women who have had RAI have later had perfectly normal children. But there are no long-term studies of these children, where the kids are followed into adulthood. Recent studies show evidence of cell mutations in children born to mothers who had RAI. RAI either destroys or mutates cells, meaning it causes changes in the DNA of the cells. As these cells divide, you have clones of mutated cells. Mutated cells can die because they're weak or they can turn into cancer cells. It often takes 30 years for mutated cells to form cancerous tissue, but in children, mutations lead to cancer sooner because their cells divide much more rapidly. This is the reason RAI is not used in women of child-bearing age in Europe and it's not recommended for children. This is also why you must avoid children and especially avoid holding them close to your chest, for several weeks after RAI. The more we learn about radiation, the more concern there is. The same radioiodine used in RAI ablation was once used in hospital labs as a tracer for diagnostic blood tests. More than a decade ago, we quit using it because of its hazardous potential. After I had RAI ablation, I contaminated the entire nuclear chemistry department of the hospital where I worked and I was measurably radioactive for 2 months. This is when I began to question what I had done. There are no easy answers here, and I can't tell you what to do. You'll have to continue to study your options and then decide what will work best for you in your particular situation. Let me know if you still have questions though and I'll try to help you sort things out. Whatever you decide, there are people here who'll support your decision and guide you through any rough spots. Take care, Elaine Elaine , Author **************** In one sense I was lucky in that I wasn't diagnosed with GD until I was nearly in remission. So my symptoms at the time of diagnosis were very mild. Where I was unlucky is in my willingness to go through with RAI just because the doc was a friend of sorts. I should have done my homework first. So if I could do it over again, I'd first try dietary changes, yoga, an herbal tonic and perhaps acupuncture. For me, this would likely have been enough. But if it wasn't I'd try ATDs at a lower dose then what's usually recommended for at least 18 months. If this didn't work due to side effects or whatever, I'd have a sub-total thyroidectomy. Although surgery is low risk, I'd do the ATDs first because I think the least aggressive treatment is the best. If you respond well to ATDs, you end up in remission, meaning no symptoms, with your thyroid gland intact. Hypothyroidism, for me, has been far worse than hyper, and with surgery you d still have a good chance of becoming hypothyroid. While PTU is safe in pregnancy, I'd make sure you're on the lowest dose necessary to keep your thyroid levels in the normal range. 100 mg would be best although studies show that amounts up to 200-300 mg are safe in pregnancy. But you need to be on PTU at least 6-8 weeks to get moved to 100 mg if you start on 200-300 mg. Even though being on the 200-300 mg should be ok, I'd want to be on less during the time of conception. Of course if your symptoms are mild and you're able to start off on 100-150 mg and then reduce it to 100 mg or less, you wouldn't have to wait to become pregnant. With surgery, you'd just want to make sure you were recovered from the surgery and healthy and that your thyroid levels had stabilized. So even though your levels can still bounce around a bit after surgery, you'd be under medical care and monitored to make sure you were on the right dose of replacement hormone to keep you in the normal range. Take care, Elaine Elaine , Author Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 Margaret, are you pregnant now? If so, I would not do RAI. It can kill your baby's thyroid and your child would be HYPO for life. My understanding is that in low doses (200mg or less from what I remember), PTU is safe during pregnancy. Even still, I would feel safer on a higher dose of PTU while pregnant than taking RAI. I personally WON'T ever do RAI. I would chose surgery first. But I am responding well to meds so I hope it never comes to that. As for me, I saw my doctor yesterday. My husband and I just found out we may lose all infertility benefits in a few months (we are still investigating options). This scared the crap outta me. Other than Graves, I have no identifiable infertility problems (and even carried my daughter to term... her death was doctor error). But I am petrified Graves is not the reason for our 2 year battle to conceive. So I NEED this coverage. Anyway, I saw my doctor yesterday and he said considering my circumstances, I can go see my Reproductive Endocrinologist and pursue IVF. I will be on PTU for it and through the pregnancy if I conceive (in fact, I will likely stay on meds through all fiture pregnancies to reduce the risk of a relapse). My doctor says he would have liked to see my TSH start rising before sending me, but because of our dire situation, he thinks I am close enough to " normal " to continue. So now we are racing the clock and trying to jump all our hurdles to make it in before March. Anyway, I'm sure others know more. But PTU was my choice because it is safe for pg. And thankfully, I started at 150mg so my dose should only get lower. Hope that helped some. Clair > > > Hello, > > > > > > You can read my story and see pictures of me before and after > RAI > > at the URL > > > below! > > > > > > God bless, > > > > > > > > HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > " > > > >http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 No I am not pregnant yet. It is my understanding that the baby can develop hypo when the mother is on PTU but that it is around 5% I think. I would be so sad if my baby got hypo because I didn't want to be. Anyway, still investigating. I am starting to like the surgery idea but I think it will be hard to find a doctor who will do it. Good luck with all your fertility challenges. I am sure it will all work out. Margaret > " cas9738@...> >Reply-To: graves_support >To: graves_support >Subject: Re: PTU vs. RAI >Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 17:51:40 -0000 > >Margaret, are you pregnant now? If so, I would not do RAI. It can >kill your baby's thyroid and your child would be HYPO for life. > >My understanding is that in low doses (200mg or less from what I >remember), PTU is safe during pregnancy. Even still, I would feel >safer on a higher dose of PTU while pregnant than taking RAI. I >personally WON'T ever do RAI. I would chose surgery first. But I >am responding well to meds so I hope it never comes to that. > >As for me, I saw my doctor yesterday. My husband and I just found >out we may lose all infertility benefits in a few months (we are >still investigating options). This scared the crap outta me. Other >than Graves, I have no identifiable infertility problems (and even >carried my daughter to term... her death was doctor error). But I am >petrified Graves is not the reason for our 2 year battle to >conceive. So I NEED this coverage. Anyway, I saw my doctor >yesterday and he said considering my circumstances, I can go see my >Reproductive Endocrinologist and pursue IVF. I will be on PTU for it >and through the pregnancy if I conceive (in fact, I will likely stay >on meds through all fiture pregnancies to reduce the risk of a >relapse). My doctor says he would have liked to see my TSH start >rising before sending me, but because of our dire situation, he >thinks I am close enough to " normal " to continue. So now we are >racing the clock and trying to jump all our hurdles to make it in >before March. > >Anyway, I'm sure others know more. But PTU was my choice because it >is safe for pg. And thankfully, I started at 150mg so my dose should >only get lower. > >Hope that helped some. > >Clair > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > You can read my story and see pictures of me before and >after > > RAI > > > at the URL > > > > below! > > > > > > > > God bless, > > > > > > > > > > > > >HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > > " > > > > > > >http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 No I am not pregnant yet. It is my understanding that the baby can develop hypo when the mother is on PTU but that it is around 5% I think. I would be so sad if my baby got hypo because I didn't want to be. Anyway, still investigating. I am starting to like the surgery idea but I think it will be hard to find a doctor who will do it. Good luck with all your fertility challenges. I am sure it will all work out. Margaret > " cas9738@...> >Reply-To: graves_support >To: graves_support >Subject: Re: PTU vs. RAI >Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 17:51:40 -0000 > >Margaret, are you pregnant now? If so, I would not do RAI. It can >kill your baby's thyroid and your child would be HYPO for life. > >My understanding is that in low doses (200mg or less from what I >remember), PTU is safe during pregnancy. Even still, I would feel >safer on a higher dose of PTU while pregnant than taking RAI. I >personally WON'T ever do RAI. I would chose surgery first. But I >am responding well to meds so I hope it never comes to that. > >As for me, I saw my doctor yesterday. My husband and I just found >out we may lose all infertility benefits in a few months (we are >still investigating options). This scared the crap outta me. Other >than Graves, I have no identifiable infertility problems (and even >carried my daughter to term... her death was doctor error). But I am >petrified Graves is not the reason for our 2 year battle to >conceive. So I NEED this coverage. Anyway, I saw my doctor >yesterday and he said considering my circumstances, I can go see my >Reproductive Endocrinologist and pursue IVF. I will be on PTU for it >and through the pregnancy if I conceive (in fact, I will likely stay >on meds through all fiture pregnancies to reduce the risk of a >relapse). My doctor says he would have liked to see my TSH start >rising before sending me, but because of our dire situation, he >thinks I am close enough to " normal " to continue. So now we are >racing the clock and trying to jump all our hurdles to make it in >before March. > >Anyway, I'm sure others know more. But PTU was my choice because it >is safe for pg. And thankfully, I started at 150mg so my dose should >only get lower. > >Hope that helped some. > >Clair > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > You can read my story and see pictures of me before and >after > > RAI > > > at the URL > > > > below! > > > > > > > > God bless, > > > > > > > > > > > > >HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > > " > > > > > > >http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 No I am not pregnant yet. It is my understanding that the baby can develop hypo when the mother is on PTU but that it is around 5% I think. I would be so sad if my baby got hypo because I didn't want to be. Anyway, still investigating. I am starting to like the surgery idea but I think it will be hard to find a doctor who will do it. Good luck with all your fertility challenges. I am sure it will all work out. Margaret > " cas9738@...> >Reply-To: graves_support >To: graves_support >Subject: Re: PTU vs. RAI >Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 17:51:40 -0000 > >Margaret, are you pregnant now? If so, I would not do RAI. It can >kill your baby's thyroid and your child would be HYPO for life. > >My understanding is that in low doses (200mg or less from what I >remember), PTU is safe during pregnancy. Even still, I would feel >safer on a higher dose of PTU while pregnant than taking RAI. I >personally WON'T ever do RAI. I would chose surgery first. But I >am responding well to meds so I hope it never comes to that. > >As for me, I saw my doctor yesterday. My husband and I just found >out we may lose all infertility benefits in a few months (we are >still investigating options). This scared the crap outta me. Other >than Graves, I have no identifiable infertility problems (and even >carried my daughter to term... her death was doctor error). But I am >petrified Graves is not the reason for our 2 year battle to >conceive. So I NEED this coverage. Anyway, I saw my doctor >yesterday and he said considering my circumstances, I can go see my >Reproductive Endocrinologist and pursue IVF. I will be on PTU for it >and through the pregnancy if I conceive (in fact, I will likely stay >on meds through all fiture pregnancies to reduce the risk of a >relapse). My doctor says he would have liked to see my TSH start >rising before sending me, but because of our dire situation, he >thinks I am close enough to " normal " to continue. So now we are >racing the clock and trying to jump all our hurdles to make it in >before March. > >Anyway, I'm sure others know more. But PTU was my choice because it >is safe for pg. And thankfully, I started at 150mg so my dose should >only get lower. > >Hope that helped some. > >Clair > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > You can read my story and see pictures of me before and >after > > RAI > > > at the URL > > > > below! > > > > > > > > God bless, > > > > > > > > > > > > >HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > > " > > > > > > >http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 Hi Margaret- Your baby will not develop hypothyroidism during the 1st trimester unless the doctors keep you hypothyroid on PTU during the 1st part of pregnancy. The baby will be completely reliant on your thyroid hormone for the 1st 11 weeks or so. After that, there is a risk that he/she could develop hypothyroidism (the baby's thyroid levels could be normal) if you still need PTU and are hyper but very often mothers don't even need ATDs at that point. That hypothyroidism will develop in the baby and not you if you're still hyper is unlikely if you need the PTU because your thyroid antibodies cross the placental barrier, making the baby hyperthyroid too (even though he/she is not the source of autoimmunity) so as long as you're OK, it is likely the baby will be OK too. They can tell if the baby is doing OK by keeping track of growth and the placenta. In this case, keeping yourself healthy is just as important as keeping your baby healthy. I don't think it's selfish to think of keeping yourself from being hypothyroid. I can tell you that the quality of life of your children will suffer greatly if you have the misfortune of being kept hypothyroid after being permanently treated for Graves'. I cannot do or enjoy what other mothers that have children my age do. Although I try not to let him see how exhausted I am all the time, he still picks up on it. Forget my husband. I'm just lucky that he understands what I'm going through. He's a physician and understands the mechanics of the whole business. The average spouse wouldn't be able to. If anything, we're selfish because we chose to have more children (after years of infertility-had infertility with my son too). I'll bet that 5% of babies that develop hypothyroidism that you quoted after their mothers have been kept on PTU was because their mothers were kept hypothyroid on it. So it is essential at this time to find an endo that is used to treating pregnant women and that specializes in thyroid disease. An OB/GYN does not have the background or knowledge to competently treat your thyroid disease during this time. Any physician that tests only TSH can easily keep you hypothyroid for some or all of your pregnancy (which is probably responsible for that 5% #) so you need someone that tests FT3 and FT4 too. TSH can lag for several months once your thyroid levels are normal so if you have a doctor that tests only TSH during pregnancy, you can become progressively more hypothyroid until TSH finally catches up. Anyhow, I know you like your doctor but a doctor that respects the way European doctors practice medicine would never suggest that you're irresponsible if you don't do RAI especially for a mild case of Graves'. They don't do that to women that are contemplating pregnancy there (Simon could tell you more here). I just had to throw my 2 cents in. After what I've gone through after RAI for almost my entire adult life and what my family has been put through, it just drives me crazy that they so cavalierly push it for Graves'. Take care, dx & RAI 1987 (at age 24) > No I am not pregnant yet. It is my understanding that the baby can develop > hypo when the mother is on PTU but that it is around 5% I think. I would be > so sad if my baby got hypo because I didn't want to be. Anyway, still > investigating. I am starting to like the surgery idea but I think it will be > hard to find a doctor who will do it. > > Good luck with all your fertility challenges. I am sure it will all work > out. > > Margaret Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 E-mail me personally and I will give you my story... We tried to have a baby for 3 years and on the verge of giving up they realized I had graves. Lost 3 pregnancies to it... I am happy to say with the help of a great endo and dr. who had done a study on graves women and pregnancy I now have a beautifull baby girl! I have since had RAI and a year later I am close to being normal... I did take PTU everyday of my pregnancy and she shows no signs of adverse effect she (Gabby) is now 26 months and running through the terrible twos... I have actually started adjusting my own meds and I am doing pretty good... well my husband has not divorced me yet... Debbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 E-mail me personally and I will give you my story... We tried to have a baby for 3 years and on the verge of giving up they realized I had graves. Lost 3 pregnancies to it... I am happy to say with the help of a great endo and dr. who had done a study on graves women and pregnancy I now have a beautifull baby girl! I have since had RAI and a year later I am close to being normal... I did take PTU everyday of my pregnancy and she shows no signs of adverse effect she (Gabby) is now 26 months and running through the terrible twos... I have actually started adjusting my own meds and I am doing pretty good... well my husband has not divorced me yet... Debbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 E-mail me personally and I will give you my story... We tried to have a baby for 3 years and on the verge of giving up they realized I had graves. Lost 3 pregnancies to it... I am happy to say with the help of a great endo and dr. who had done a study on graves women and pregnancy I now have a beautifull baby girl! I have since had RAI and a year later I am close to being normal... I did take PTU everyday of my pregnancy and she shows no signs of adverse effect she (Gabby) is now 26 months and running through the terrible twos... I have actually started adjusting my own meds and I am doing pretty good... well my husband has not divorced me yet... Debbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Hi Debbie- The hypothyroidism didn't become a real problem til several years after RAI after I stopped converting T4 (levothyroxine) to T3 (active thyroid hormone) efficiently. Most husbands (or wives) do not understand the huge change this entails and both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism are very hard on a marriage. I graduated summa cum laude in biology and later graduated with a 4.0 with my master's (in parasitology which involves immune function) and I couldn't figure it out. My husband is an academic physician who is very well-respected in our community and he couldn't figure out what was wrong with me. Neither could any of my doctors until I came across a very good endo after 11 years that finally figured it out. They certainly didn't do it on purpose. You were very lucky that you found good doctors to take care of you. Not all of us are so fortunate and, I daresay, most of us will not have that kind of care at our disposal. I can't think of a patient that had better resources than I did yet it happened to me. Studies show that a significant minority of patients do not do well after RAI (30%). Yet we are not told that when we are told that we must have RAI. If I had known those odds, I would never have chosen to have RAI. Anyhow, like you, many people do well after RAI. It isn't a guarantee of the future but, even at this point, that you are doing well is a good sign. I know too many that aren't that lucky. It's very difficult to get in to see a good endo that specializes in thyroid disease. Most endos specialize in diabetes. Sorry about getting on my high horse. But when you're one of the ones that doesn't do well even though 2 out of 3 do, it doesn't help to see how well people can do. It's like when you suffer from infertility and seeing everyone around you getting pregnant when you can't. It's not very comforting that only 10-15% of women suffer from infertility when you are one of those that can't get pregnant. RAI doesn't even have odds that good. Take care, dx & RAI 1987 (at age 24) I have actually started adjusting my own meds and I am > doing pretty good... well my husband has not divorced me yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Hi Debbie- The hypothyroidism didn't become a real problem til several years after RAI after I stopped converting T4 (levothyroxine) to T3 (active thyroid hormone) efficiently. Most husbands (or wives) do not understand the huge change this entails and both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism are very hard on a marriage. I graduated summa cum laude in biology and later graduated with a 4.0 with my master's (in parasitology which involves immune function) and I couldn't figure it out. My husband is an academic physician who is very well-respected in our community and he couldn't figure out what was wrong with me. Neither could any of my doctors until I came across a very good endo after 11 years that finally figured it out. They certainly didn't do it on purpose. You were very lucky that you found good doctors to take care of you. Not all of us are so fortunate and, I daresay, most of us will not have that kind of care at our disposal. I can't think of a patient that had better resources than I did yet it happened to me. Studies show that a significant minority of patients do not do well after RAI (30%). Yet we are not told that when we are told that we must have RAI. If I had known those odds, I would never have chosen to have RAI. Anyhow, like you, many people do well after RAI. It isn't a guarantee of the future but, even at this point, that you are doing well is a good sign. I know too many that aren't that lucky. It's very difficult to get in to see a good endo that specializes in thyroid disease. Most endos specialize in diabetes. Sorry about getting on my high horse. But when you're one of the ones that doesn't do well even though 2 out of 3 do, it doesn't help to see how well people can do. It's like when you suffer from infertility and seeing everyone around you getting pregnant when you can't. It's not very comforting that only 10-15% of women suffer from infertility when you are one of those that can't get pregnant. RAI doesn't even have odds that good. Take care, dx & RAI 1987 (at age 24) I have actually started adjusting my own meds and I am > doing pretty good... well my husband has not divorced me yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Hi Debbie- The hypothyroidism didn't become a real problem til several years after RAI after I stopped converting T4 (levothyroxine) to T3 (active thyroid hormone) efficiently. Most husbands (or wives) do not understand the huge change this entails and both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism are very hard on a marriage. I graduated summa cum laude in biology and later graduated with a 4.0 with my master's (in parasitology which involves immune function) and I couldn't figure it out. My husband is an academic physician who is very well-respected in our community and he couldn't figure out what was wrong with me. Neither could any of my doctors until I came across a very good endo after 11 years that finally figured it out. They certainly didn't do it on purpose. You were very lucky that you found good doctors to take care of you. Not all of us are so fortunate and, I daresay, most of us will not have that kind of care at our disposal. I can't think of a patient that had better resources than I did yet it happened to me. Studies show that a significant minority of patients do not do well after RAI (30%). Yet we are not told that when we are told that we must have RAI. If I had known those odds, I would never have chosen to have RAI. Anyhow, like you, many people do well after RAI. It isn't a guarantee of the future but, even at this point, that you are doing well is a good sign. I know too many that aren't that lucky. It's very difficult to get in to see a good endo that specializes in thyroid disease. Most endos specialize in diabetes. Sorry about getting on my high horse. But when you're one of the ones that doesn't do well even though 2 out of 3 do, it doesn't help to see how well people can do. It's like when you suffer from infertility and seeing everyone around you getting pregnant when you can't. It's not very comforting that only 10-15% of women suffer from infertility when you are one of those that can't get pregnant. RAI doesn't even have odds that good. Take care, dx & RAI 1987 (at age 24) I have actually started adjusting my own meds and I am > doing pretty good... well my husband has not divorced me yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Hi Margaret, While steroids do offer short-term protection against GO occurring after RAI, many people do not develop GO until years after having RAI. This is because the antibodies that cause both GD and GO are increased for many years after having RAI. It's not feasible to remain on steroids long-term. Take care, Elaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Hi Margaret, While steroids do offer short-term protection against GO occurring after RAI, many people do not develop GO until years after having RAI. This is because the antibodies that cause both GD and GO are increased for many years after having RAI. It's not feasible to remain on steroids long-term. Take care, Elaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Hi Margaret, While steroids do offer short-term protection against GO occurring after RAI, many people do not develop GO until years after having RAI. This is because the antibodies that cause both GD and GO are increased for many years after having RAI. It's not feasible to remain on steroids long-term. Take care, Elaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 , I read your story and am so tempted to print out the pictures and bring them to my doctor who is adamant that RAI doesn't make the eyes worse. I know radiation and steroids don't always work, but I was interested if they tried them on you? I just read another study that showed that of 135 people who did RAI w/ 3 months of steroids, none developed or had worsening of GED. I guess the trick is finding a doctor who will do 3 months of steroids. When I asked my ophthalmologist, who is the leader in Graves' in Seattle, if I could do steroids before and after, he said no and to just come in two weeks after. By then, if I have eye problems I guess it would be too late. Some help. I wish the doctors would read the studies as actively as we do! Margaret Re: Re: PTU vs. RAI Clair! I am glad I found you too! Feel free to share my webpage with anyone that you think it would help! Thank you for your well wishes.......right back at ya! Two of my friends from Bible study who have had fertility issues and IVFs have just become pregnant...and I am praying for the same thing for you! God bless, http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.htmlhttp://ho\ metown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 , I read your story and am so tempted to print out the pictures and bring them to my doctor who is adamant that RAI doesn't make the eyes worse. I know radiation and steroids don't always work, but I was interested if they tried them on you? I just read another study that showed that of 135 people who did RAI w/ 3 months of steroids, none developed or had worsening of GED. I guess the trick is finding a doctor who will do 3 months of steroids. When I asked my ophthalmologist, who is the leader in Graves' in Seattle, if I could do steroids before and after, he said no and to just come in two weeks after. By then, if I have eye problems I guess it would be too late. Some help. I wish the doctors would read the studies as actively as we do! Margaret Re: Re: PTU vs. RAI Clair! I am glad I found you too! Feel free to share my webpage with anyone that you think it would help! Thank you for your well wishes.......right back at ya! Two of my friends from Bible study who have had fertility issues and IVFs have just become pregnant...and I am praying for the same thing for you! God bless, http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.htmlhttp://ho\ metown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 , I read your story and am so tempted to print out the pictures and bring them to my doctor who is adamant that RAI doesn't make the eyes worse. I know radiation and steroids don't always work, but I was interested if they tried them on you? I just read another study that showed that of 135 people who did RAI w/ 3 months of steroids, none developed or had worsening of GED. I guess the trick is finding a doctor who will do 3 months of steroids. When I asked my ophthalmologist, who is the leader in Graves' in Seattle, if I could do steroids before and after, he said no and to just come in two weeks after. By then, if I have eye problems I guess it would be too late. Some help. I wish the doctors would read the studies as actively as we do! Margaret Re: Re: PTU vs. RAI Clair! I am glad I found you too! Feel free to share my webpage with anyone that you think it would help! Thank you for your well wishes.......right back at ya! Two of my friends from Bible study who have had fertility issues and IVFs have just become pregnant...and I am praying for the same thing for you! God bless, http://hometown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.htmlhttp://ho\ metown.aol.com/lisareynolds64/myhomepage/personal.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2002 Report Share Posted December 29, 2002 In a message dated 12/28/2002 8:24:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, margaretlmiller@... writes: > my doctor who is adamant that RAI doesn't make the eyes worse Margaret, This statement is simply not true. It can make your eyes worse and any doc who says it can't isn't worth sticking with. In my opinion, if I had it to do over again with the knowlege I have now, I wouldn't even chance RAI in conjunction with steroids to protect the eyes. Granted, I have worst case scenario, so I have lived the nightmare and of course wouldn't recommend RAI in any form to my worst enemy. Why would anyone take the CHANCE of looking the way I do now? After I found out that I should not have taken RAI, I sought a new endo. So it was 2 months after my GP started me on Synthroid (2 weeks post RAI) that I saw the new one. At that point, I was very hypO, TSH 97, and I was a physical and emotional mess. My ophth wanted to put me on steroids, but after speaking with my new endo, they decided that the side effects of steroids would be worse for me than any benefits I would gain. Your thyroid is not sick, your autoimmune system is. Meds address the autoimmune nature of Graves as they will lower the antibodies that are attacking the thyroid and eye tissues. When you take RAI, thyroid tissue is killed, not antibodies. So after RAI, the ABs need to find a new victim...the eyes. So RAI can and does make the eye disease worse...not for everyone. But let me tell you, the severe form of this eye disease is a horrendous thing to have to live with! I really think you need a new doctor, but that is just my opinion. God bless, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2002 Report Share Posted December 29, 2002 In a message dated 12/28/2002 8:24:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, margaretlmiller@... writes: > my doctor who is adamant that RAI doesn't make the eyes worse Margaret, This statement is simply not true. It can make your eyes worse and any doc who says it can't isn't worth sticking with. In my opinion, if I had it to do over again with the knowlege I have now, I wouldn't even chance RAI in conjunction with steroids to protect the eyes. Granted, I have worst case scenario, so I have lived the nightmare and of course wouldn't recommend RAI in any form to my worst enemy. Why would anyone take the CHANCE of looking the way I do now? After I found out that I should not have taken RAI, I sought a new endo. So it was 2 months after my GP started me on Synthroid (2 weeks post RAI) that I saw the new one. At that point, I was very hypO, TSH 97, and I was a physical and emotional mess. My ophth wanted to put me on steroids, but after speaking with my new endo, they decided that the side effects of steroids would be worse for me than any benefits I would gain. Your thyroid is not sick, your autoimmune system is. Meds address the autoimmune nature of Graves as they will lower the antibodies that are attacking the thyroid and eye tissues. When you take RAI, thyroid tissue is killed, not antibodies. So after RAI, the ABs need to find a new victim...the eyes. So RAI can and does make the eye disease worse...not for everyone. But let me tell you, the severe form of this eye disease is a horrendous thing to have to live with! I really think you need a new doctor, but that is just my opinion. God bless, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.