Re: 3 questions, Ed's memory is better than mine!

[Guest guest]

>

> , it was me. I brought up the 20$ absorption rate of DMSA a few

> months ago. I think I debated it with you via email (it could have

> been someone else).

>

>

Thanks Ed for reminding me. It seems that my memory works better when

I am given more clues. Sometimes it takes time, like 48 h or more,

for me to recall something.

The conclusion of our email discussion was that your memory is better

than mine. I'm posting this information for everyone else in case

they can remember that.

My memory works much better when I have no stress. When I am stressed

my memory is very limited. I sure hope chelation will help.

J

[Guest guest]

>

> , it was me. I brought up the 20$ absorption rate of DMSA a few

> months ago. I think I debated it with you via email (it could have

> been someone else).

>

>

Thanks Ed for reminding me. It seems that my memory works better when

I am given more clues. Sometimes it takes time, like 48 h or more,

for me to recall something.

The conclusion of our email discussion was that your memory is better

than mine. I'm posting this information for everyone else in case

they can remember that.

My memory works much better when I have no stress. When I am stressed

my memory is very limited. I sure hope chelation will help.

J

[Guest guest]

Keep the faith, , my memory was like that only a few months ago. Now it

is probably 60% better than it was...with only a few days (usually a day or two

past round) that I'm not able to recall things.

Robyn

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks Ed for reminding me. It seems that my memory works better when

I am given more clues. Sometimes it takes time, like 48 h or more,

for me to recall something.

-- J