Re: Wow--great improvement after amalgam removal

[Guest guest]

Excellent point, Jackie I never think of an allergy to mercury, but I guess

we can be allergic to virtually anything, so why not mercury? There is probably

a test for it, just like there is for other allergens. : Donna

-----------------I agree Donna, that when there is immediate improvement, it's

not related to toxicity, because like you said, you've only gotten rid of the

source of exposure, you've done nothing for what is already stored in your body.

And I also agree that it could be related to the removal of the galvanism or

electrical factor. But the other possibility in cases like these is maybe he had

a true mercury allergy as would be detected on the Melisa test? Removing the

allergen would also result in pretty fast improvement too, wouldn't you think?

And we had a recent discussion about this, and Andy did say there is a

difference between toxicity and allergy. I wonder if there is any way of knowing

which one it is?--------- --Jackie

In frequent-dose- chelation@ yahoogroups. com Donna wrote:

Josh, I just wanted to point out that, in my opinion, when such immediate

results are experienced after amalgam removal, it has little/nothing to do with

the mercury factor. As evidenced by what it takes for mercury to be removed from

the body, simply removing the source, doesn't remove the mercury or the damage

it's done to the body. It has always been my feeling that immediate improvements

are due to the removal of the electrical current and its effect on the brain and

body. : Donna

>>Josh wrote: It has not even been a month yet since the removal... This week

has

>>been incredible. I feel like a million bucks. I can not tell you

>>when I felt this calm... it almost doesn't fill right.