Guest guest Posted December 2, 2002 Report Share Posted December 2, 2002 Hi all - I see that in the mid 20th century in Japan, it was generally accepted that ATDs could be taken long term with no ill side effects: QUOTE: K Shizume Long term antithyroid drug therapy for intractable cases of Graves' disease. Endocrinol Jpn, August 1, 1978; 25(4): 377-9. Among the 504 patients with Graves' disease in whom the author initiated antithyroid drug therapy between 1956 and 1968 are 14 to whom the administration of antithyroid drug has been continued for 8 to 21 years because of recurrence shortly after the discontinuation of drugs. During these periods, no side effects were observed and three patients went into complete remission after 8, 9 and 20 years of antithyroid drug administration, respectively. It is suggested therefore that the long term administration of antithryoid drugs can be a useful treatment for intractable cases. END QUOTE. (Intractible means " not easily managed or controlled " so I gather the other study participants went into remission...?) Now the big question: Why was it acceptable then, but American endos push destruction of the thyroid gland and insist that ATDs are too toxic to bother with?? Inquiring minds want to know. Copy this and take it to your next endo visit. I'd post the link, but once again it is too long to copy correctly. Best Wishes, Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.