Guest guest Posted February 27, 2008 Report Share Posted February 27, 2008 > > Andy or anyone who knows... > Can anyone please offer some input on whether or not the urine > challenge is an accurate and adviseable way to determine heavy metal The urine challenge is neither accurate nor advisable. Random amounts of metals are pulled and some of this is excreted, while the rest is redistributed in the body causing damage. The excreted metals are not representative of body burden. These tests are harmful and uninterpretable. > toxicity? I am interested in chelating our son with ALA alone but want > to do a DMSA urine challenge first to make sure other metals are not > free floating to potentially cross the BBB while using ALA. This is usually not a big concern with children because their exposure is not so recent. If your child does have very recent exposure (within 3 months), then start with DMSA alone and add ALA within a few months. -- Thanks > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2008 Report Share Posted February 27, 2008 , after weeks of research I've decided to do the DDI hair elements test on my son (8 yrs) because the challenge test is *not* accurate (see other posts). I want to know exactly what the score is before we start chelation - also, like you want to make sure the chelation won't cause complications. More expensive, but don't want to miss something, or chelate when symptoms are caused by something else. Joy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 > > , after weeks of research I've decided to do the DDI hair elements > test on my son (8 yrs) because the challenge test is *not* accurate > (see other posts). I want to know exactly what the score is before we > start chelation - also, like you want to make sure the chelation won't > cause complications. More expensive, but don't want to miss something, > or chelate when symptoms are caused by something else. Joy > Joy, Yes thanks. We are waiting the results of a hair elements test along with a urine porphyrin from Paris which I found an interpretation method to use it with. I am still in complete CONFUSION over the difference in protocols between the ARI and Andy. The two major conflicts seem to be frequency and amount. Their ideas of the half life of DMSA are different and the amount is 20 times more with the ARI - DAN protocol. It is very troubling for a skeptical parent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 > > , after weeks of research I've decided to do the DDI hair elements > test on my son (8 yrs) because the challenge test is *not* accurate > (see other posts). I want to know exactly what the score is before we > start chelation - also, like you want to make sure the chelation won't > cause complications. More expensive, but don't want to miss something, > or chelate when symptoms are caused by something else. Joy > Joy, Yes thanks. We are waiting the results of a hair elements test along with a urine porphyrin from Paris which I found an interpretation method to use it with. I am still in complete CONFUSION over the difference in protocols between the ARI and Andy. The two major conflicts seem to be frequency and amount. Their ideas of the half life of DMSA are different and the amount is 20 times more with the ARI - DAN protocol. It is very troubling for a skeptical parent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 the major thing i am confused about is that why people say the urine test is completely useless, becuase some of us have had this test before we heard about andys work and the possible side effects etc. But i would not have known about chelation at all had i not had a urine test that showed up metals. and also these metals are inside us so if a urine test finds them surely this is a good thing, so we can get rid of them, thats why i dont understand why people say they are completely uselss, also they surely offer some sort of diagnostic use as the doctors that do them do them on many patients so just among the patients they do it on they must be able to see that some people are very toxic and others less so, by comparing them to each other. > > > > , after weeks of research I've decided to do the DDI hair > elements > > test on my son (8 yrs) because the challenge test is *not* accurate > > (see other posts). I want to know exactly what the score is before we > > start chelation - also, like you want to make sure the chelation > won't > > cause complications. More expensive, but don't want to miss > something, > > or chelate when symptoms are caused by something else. Joy > > > > Joy, > Yes thanks. We are waiting the results of a hair elements test along > with a urine porphyrin from Paris which I found an interpretation > method to use it with. I am still in complete CONFUSION over the > difference in protocols between the ARI and Andy. The two major > conflicts seem to be frequency and amount. Their ideas of the half > life of DMSA are different and the amount is 20 times more with the > ARI - DAN protocol. It is very troubling for a skeptical parent. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.