/was:Re: Andy's protocol vs. ARI's protocol

February 28, 2008

>

> Hi ,

>

> Confusing for sure. I felt the same way in the beginning so I

joined all the lists and read everything and still couldn't figure

out what to do. So I just kept track of what people said they were

doing, Dan! or Andy's protocol and what I found after 9 months of

carefully watching is that some kids did well with the huge amounts

of chelators and less frequent dosing....but some did horrible,

banging their heads, regressing and every other sort of side effect

you wouldn't want.

>

> I didn't find that on Andy's protocol, just kids doing better, no

reports of horrible regressions or side effects. So the conclusion is

that some kids can take the Dan! protocol, but a LOT can't and it is,

for me, about finding the safest way to get ours better.

>

> This is my granddaughter who was formerly autistic, now totally

indistinguishable from other children, except in good ways, no dx, in

a regular first grade with no aide, doing beautifully both

academically and socially.

>

> I wish you luck with your quest, let us know if we can answer any

further questions.

>

> ,

Thanks so much for such a convincing reply. My gut steers me that

direction and we are that much closer to deciding which direction to

take. If you will, please share more details of your experience.

Which chelators did you use. Starting age, ending age. Were the

improvements signifigant and surely from chelation? Any info would

be a great help. Thanks again,

> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 6:09 PM

> Subject: Re: Andy's protocol vs. ARI's

protocol

>

Recommended Posts