Mercury and Autism link debunked... You've got to be kidding...

[Guest guest]

What kind of " science " is this study based on?

http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?

AID=/20080112/GJLIFESTYLES_01/943796742/-1/FOSLIFESTYLES

Proving that mercury isn't a cause by an increase of autism in

children who recieved imunizations not containing mercury is just

pure insanity. The logic they are using in this case boggles my mind.

Do I think it's the cause of all Autism, no, but do I think it is a

cause yes. In fact the article points to a comment from the

study " These time trends are inconsistent with the hypothesis that

thimerosal exposure is a primary cause of autism in California " .

Notice they didn't say it was not a cause of autism, but not the

primary one. So if we were to follow their broken logic in this

study then they are basically admiting that mercury is indeed a

cause, but not a primary one.

Can't have it both ways folks.

Sorry, for the rant, but I'm sure Andy has already commented

elsewhere. The internet is ablaze with folks saying " see we told you

imunizations aren't a cause " based on this study. Ugg!

Mike