Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Fighting is good, but you also need to know when to stop fighting, and have the ability to completely line up behind whichever side " wins " , and remain loyal to the organization, even if you might disagree with some of the decisions. Sent from the itty bitty keyboard on my iPhone On Apr 21, 2010, at 22:24, " rob.davis@... " rob.davis@... > wrote: > On Wednesday, April 21, 2010 09:39, " Wayne D " rxmd911@...> > said: > > > As long as we fight among ourselves, no one will want to join. > > True. But if we don't fight among ourselves, we'll never work things > out and acquire a focused vision. Damned if we do. Damned if we > don't. But I am of the opinion that we are in the pickle we are in > because we don't fight enough. If we just walk merrily along, > pretending everything is fine, and that we all agree on everything, > we're going to continue to go nowhere. > > Fighting is good. Fighting is what built this country. > > Rob > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Fighting is good, but you also need to know when to stop fighting, and have the ability to completely line up behind whichever side " wins " , and remain loyal to the organization, even if you might disagree with some of the decisions. Sent from the itty bitty keyboard on my iPhone On Apr 21, 2010, at 22:24, " rob.davis@... " rob.davis@... > wrote: > On Wednesday, April 21, 2010 09:39, " Wayne D " rxmd911@...> > said: > > > As long as we fight among ourselves, no one will want to join. > > True. But if we don't fight among ourselves, we'll never work things > out and acquire a focused vision. Damned if we do. Damned if we > don't. But I am of the opinion that we are in the pickle we are in > because we don't fight enough. If we just walk merrily along, > pretending everything is fine, and that we all agree on everything, > we're going to continue to go nowhere. > > Fighting is good. Fighting is what built this country. > > Rob > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Fighting is good, but you also need to know when to stop fighting, and have the ability to completely line up behind whichever side " wins " , and remain loyal to the organization, even if you might disagree with some of the decisions. Sent from the itty bitty keyboard on my iPhone On Apr 21, 2010, at 22:24, " rob.davis@... " rob.davis@... > wrote: > On Wednesday, April 21, 2010 09:39, " Wayne D " rxmd911@...> > said: > > > As long as we fight among ourselves, no one will want to join. > > True. But if we don't fight among ourselves, we'll never work things > out and acquire a focused vision. Damned if we do. Damned if we > don't. But I am of the opinion that we are in the pickle we are in > because we don't fight enough. If we just walk merrily along, > pretending everything is fine, and that we all agree on everything, > we're going to continue to go nowhere. > > Fighting is good. Fighting is what built this country. > > Rob > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Well you know, nah never happen but maybe orangutans.............. Gene thanks for such a clear explanation and even history of EMSAT. I was a member but never notified when membership was to expire and when I guessed it should be time could not get on the web site to renew. I really think a way to get membership up quickly would be to contact the educational programs in the state and ask them to include the cost of membership in the class fees. Then as part of the education include a lesson or two on activities that get the students involved, heck even Doc Bledsoe's book mentions Paramedics being active in the advancement of EMS. Would all remain active? No, but it would help get operational funds and maybe at least a decent percentage would remain active. Then with an organization having some funds those already in EMS would see the possibilities and more would join. Perhaps this has been tried. Perhaps it is to late. Renny Spencer Paramedic Their motto is " Go with the flow. " If the state decides that chimpanzees can be EMTs, so be it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Well you know, nah never happen but maybe orangutans.............. Gene thanks for such a clear explanation and even history of EMSAT. I was a member but never notified when membership was to expire and when I guessed it should be time could not get on the web site to renew. I really think a way to get membership up quickly would be to contact the educational programs in the state and ask them to include the cost of membership in the class fees. Then as part of the education include a lesson or two on activities that get the students involved, heck even Doc Bledsoe's book mentions Paramedics being active in the advancement of EMS. Would all remain active? No, but it would help get operational funds and maybe at least a decent percentage would remain active. Then with an organization having some funds those already in EMS would see the possibilities and more would join. Perhaps this has been tried. Perhaps it is to late. Renny Spencer Paramedic Their motto is " Go with the flow. " If the state decides that chimpanzees can be EMTs, so be it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Well you know, nah never happen but maybe orangutans.............. Gene thanks for such a clear explanation and even history of EMSAT. I was a member but never notified when membership was to expire and when I guessed it should be time could not get on the web site to renew. I really think a way to get membership up quickly would be to contact the educational programs in the state and ask them to include the cost of membership in the class fees. Then as part of the education include a lesson or two on activities that get the students involved, heck even Doc Bledsoe's book mentions Paramedics being active in the advancement of EMS. Would all remain active? No, but it would help get operational funds and maybe at least a decent percentage would remain active. Then with an organization having some funds those already in EMS would see the possibilities and more would join. Perhaps this has been tried. Perhaps it is to late. Renny Spencer Paramedic Their motto is " Go with the flow. " If the state decides that chimpanzees can be EMTs, so be it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Just one more thought from me.... have any of these organizations that claim to represent EMS shown us why EMS as a whole (as opposed to just firefighters, volunteers, or private EMS) needs an umbrella voice? Are there issues that impact ALL of us in EMS and that require a unified voice? -Wes In a message dated 4/22/2010 4:22:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time, rick.moore@... writes: This is a great reply Gene, I know I was not aware of the history of EMSAT. I do have to say that I don’t know if it’s apathy or suspicion or economic issues but it really doesn’t seem to make any difference how productive an organization is if the proposed membership does not believe in it. TETAF is an organization that has full time staff, has a proven record of legislative awareness and has gotten farther with the proposed “platinum plan†for EMS CE than anyone else, yet the EMS division seems to struggle with participation and membership. Comments that I hear most often are that TETAF is all about trauma and hospitals and does nothing for EMS and EMS needs its own statewide organization, yet here is evidence that didn’t work either. I also have to say that we are inundated now days with associations and organizations on the local, state and national level that want our membership and insist they are the only ones who can provide the services we need. Add to that NR fees, state cert or license fees, fees for CE, subscriptions for journals, etc. that low $35.00 membership fee is now multiplied several times over. Sure we may spend that on pizza and beer, but at least pizza nourishes and beer hydrates. Unfortunately if I am having a tough time paying the bills and feeding my family any fees that are not required to maintain the license that allows me to perform my job are going to get cut from the budget. At this point I think that is the bigger reason EMSAT is where it’s at now and probably the reason it won’t bounce back anytime soon. Rick From: _texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem_ (mailto:texasems-l ) [mailto:_texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem_ (mailto:texasems-l ) ] On Behalf Of _wegandy1938@wegandy_ (mailto:wegandy1938@...) Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:22 PM To: _texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem_ (mailto:texasems-l ) Subject: Re: EMSAT I have held off commenting on EMSAT, not wanting to become a part of a kerfuffle, but perhaps I can help those who haven't been around for lebenty-eight years like me and Louis and Ron and so forth. I am a former board member and (I think) officer. It's been a while since I was involved, since I have spent much of my time out of Texas in the last few years but remain convinced that Texas has the best EMS of any state in the union. 1. At one time NAEMT had a presence in Texas, and it had local chapters, something EMSAT never did, and probably one of the reasons EMSAT failed. However, people also lost interest in NAEMT and it basically folded as a local entity in Texas. 2. About that time, Ron Haussecker and others, with the encouragement of the then Bureau Chief, formed EMSAT. It was formed as a tax exempt corporation and it had full IRS recognition as a tax free entity. There were also other attempts at starting organizations. I can't remember the names of any of them but none of them survived. Legally, EMSAT is a legitimate, legal, organization. It is a private organization as are most corporations, but it's no different from the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, or the Catholic Church. It is a charitable corporatioin. 3. EMSAT's mission was to monitor the actions of the legislature and what was then the Texas Department of Health to see what was going on and make sure that the interests of the rank and file EMS provider were promoted and protected. It also tried to do some other things like offer CE, insurance, and so forth, but its primary purpose was as a watchdog for EMS providers and as a lobbyist at the legislature. 4. After it got started, it had enough members to hire a legislative lobbyist to track legislation that could effect EMS, to work to kill legislation that was detrimental to EMS, and to promote legislation that was friendly to EMS. Without going into details, EMSAT was successful in killing a number of bills that would have been harmful to EMS. This was done by an organization that never achieved even 1% of the 50,000+ certificants in Texas. Why do Texas EMS people not want to join an organization that makes sense for them and costs little? There are many reasons. Big city firefighter EMS folks are generally union members, and they feel that their union takes care of their needs. They see themselves as members of their department, not as members of the Texas EMS family. So they see no reason to join. Others feel that they cannot afford the dues ($35) although the routinely spend that on pizza and beer. Others are simply not interested in what happens to them. Their motto is " Go with the flow. " If the state decides that chimpanzees can be EMTs, so be it. 5. One of the major failings was not having an office with a paid full-time person to answer the phone, keep books, handle memberships, write correspondence, and so forth. There simply was never enough money to do that. That probably was the one greatest thing that held EMSAT back. It's the old problem, you can't get eggs till you have chickens, but if you can't afford a chicken, you can't have any eggs. 6. Attempts were made to hire part-time people to work from home handling the business and contacts with members. One such individual was a disaster, while another did her best to keep things running and for a time improved the situation but, once again, the money was just not there due to lack of memberships. 7. Why won't people join EMSAT? There are many answers, but the number one reason is apathy. Many folks never knew about EMSAT, or if they did had a skewed understanding of what it did, or simply didn't see it as worth $35. When I was on the board, the most frequent question I got from prospective members was, " What's in it for me? " The second most frequent was " What has EMSAT done? " I thought I had good explanations for both those questions, but there seemed to be a notion that EMSAT had never done anything meaningful. Most folks do not follow the actions of the legislature and simply do not appreciate all the near misses EMSAT avoided through its lobbying activities and the bad things it helped keep from happening. That's a part of apathy. So people refused to join because they didn't think EMSAT had done anything, but EMSAT was hampered by not having enough revenue from memberships to maintain a staff and a lobbyist, so its lobbying efforts eventually failed, and it eventually reached its present state as a non-functional organization. For an organization to be able to make a difference, it has to have money. There has to be some trust somewhere. Some will say that EMSAT squandered its trust, and to an extent, that's true, because it has not always been responsive to members and prospective members, but again, without money, you can't do those things. 8. Throughout, as with any organization, there have been internecine spats among the board and the members, which didn't help, but in my judgment didn't sink the organization. What sunk the organization was lack of membership. 9. My comments are not meant to criticize ANYBODY. Ron Houssecker gave his heart and soul to EMSAT and to EMS. I know him well, and while I have not always agreed with him, I will defend until the death his dedication to EMS. The present President, Louis Molino, has done his best to keep things going. One man with a full-time job cannot run an organization like EMSAT and do anything but try to keep it from sliding under the waves. 10. Can EMSAT be salvaged? I doubt it. If only 500 people would join, it would be on solid footing once again, but if 500 people tried to join right now, I don't know how they would do it. Who would the contact to join? Who would process their memberships? Perhaps Lou can clarify this. 11. Texas NEEDS an organization like EMSAT. If all 50,000 of our certified/licensed personnel were members, do not think that the Texas Legislature would not listen to us. Case in point. I'm a lawyer, and I belong to the Texas Bar Association. I have no choice. I MUST belong and pay dues or I can't practice law. What do I get? Some lawyers say not much, but the TBA is one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the state. It has the ear of the legislature, big time. At EMSAT we once debated different ideas to increase membership, one of which was some way to link membership in EMSAT to certification. When I pay my annual Bar dues (well, now that I'm over 70 I don't have to pay them anymore), I automatically pay my dues to the Texas Bar. Perhaps some such arrangement might work for EMSAT. But don't hold your breath. I expect that if such a thing was proposed, there would be Tea Parties all over the place, and the proposal would quickly die. Bottom line: EMS folks are like cats. You love them or hate them, but you can't herd them. Gene Gandy, JD, LP, NREMT-P EMS Education and Consulting Tucson, AZ Re: EMSAT > > I tried to join a few months ago and could not make the website work > for > me. I intended to try again but forgot. I would still like to join and > support the effort. If EMSAT is a good idea (and I think it is), let's > not let the setback cause it to go away. So many individuals, > organizations and companies have seen very hard times before ultimate > success. There does appear to be a need for EMSAT as DSHS is the only > voice EMS has in the state. > > Perhaps this list can be used to determine what needs to be done and > the > directions EMSAT needs to go. That may well grow the organization and > yield even more interesting projects. > > I have tried the website again with no luck. So, this time I will just > put the requested information on a piece of paper, enclose an check > and > use snail-mail. Oh the anguish when technology fails! > > Be safe everyone and think about getting this organization into gear > again --- > > Dick -- EMT-B > Celina Fire Department > > > > > > Our BoD is down to Four. We have no support and extremely little > > intrest from anyone except for the occasional message here or to our > > info E-Mail address on our website which has no one maintaining it > > > > I could blame these facts on a variety of factors but I won't. I > will > > accept the blame as the current and to be frank likely the last > > President of EMSAT. > > > > In ways I am sorry and apologize to the whole of Trxas EMS but I do > > sleep soundly knowing I have tried my personal bet to build EMSAT. > > I've failed and that bothers me greatly. > > > > Louis N. Molino, Sr. CET > > FF/NREMT/FSI/ EMSI > > Typed by my fingers on my iPhone. > > Please excuse any typos. > > (Cell) > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > > > On Apr 19, 2010, at 20:48, Neil White > > wrote: > > > > > Anyone know if EMSAT is still going? If so, what projects do they > > > have going > > > at this time? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > -- > > > Neil White, RN, LP > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Just one more thought from me.... have any of these organizations that claim to represent EMS shown us why EMS as a whole (as opposed to just firefighters, volunteers, or private EMS) needs an umbrella voice? Are there issues that impact ALL of us in EMS and that require a unified voice? -Wes In a message dated 4/22/2010 4:22:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time, rick.moore@... writes: This is a great reply Gene, I know I was not aware of the history of EMSAT. I do have to say that I don’t know if it’s apathy or suspicion or economic issues but it really doesn’t seem to make any difference how productive an organization is if the proposed membership does not believe in it. TETAF is an organization that has full time staff, has a proven record of legislative awareness and has gotten farther with the proposed “platinum plan†for EMS CE than anyone else, yet the EMS division seems to struggle with participation and membership. Comments that I hear most often are that TETAF is all about trauma and hospitals and does nothing for EMS and EMS needs its own statewide organization, yet here is evidence that didn’t work either. I also have to say that we are inundated now days with associations and organizations on the local, state and national level that want our membership and insist they are the only ones who can provide the services we need. Add to that NR fees, state cert or license fees, fees for CE, subscriptions for journals, etc. that low $35.00 membership fee is now multiplied several times over. Sure we may spend that on pizza and beer, but at least pizza nourishes and beer hydrates. Unfortunately if I am having a tough time paying the bills and feeding my family any fees that are not required to maintain the license that allows me to perform my job are going to get cut from the budget. At this point I think that is the bigger reason EMSAT is where it’s at now and probably the reason it won’t bounce back anytime soon. Rick From: _texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem_ (mailto:texasems-l ) [mailto:_texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem_ (mailto:texasems-l ) ] On Behalf Of _wegandy1938@wegandy_ (mailto:wegandy1938@...) Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:22 PM To: _texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem_ (mailto:texasems-l ) Subject: Re: EMSAT I have held off commenting on EMSAT, not wanting to become a part of a kerfuffle, but perhaps I can help those who haven't been around for lebenty-eight years like me and Louis and Ron and so forth. I am a former board member and (I think) officer. It's been a while since I was involved, since I have spent much of my time out of Texas in the last few years but remain convinced that Texas has the best EMS of any state in the union. 1. At one time NAEMT had a presence in Texas, and it had local chapters, something EMSAT never did, and probably one of the reasons EMSAT failed. However, people also lost interest in NAEMT and it basically folded as a local entity in Texas. 2. About that time, Ron Haussecker and others, with the encouragement of the then Bureau Chief, formed EMSAT. It was formed as a tax exempt corporation and it had full IRS recognition as a tax free entity. There were also other attempts at starting organizations. I can't remember the names of any of them but none of them survived. Legally, EMSAT is a legitimate, legal, organization. It is a private organization as are most corporations, but it's no different from the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, or the Catholic Church. It is a charitable corporatioin. 3. EMSAT's mission was to monitor the actions of the legislature and what was then the Texas Department of Health to see what was going on and make sure that the interests of the rank and file EMS provider were promoted and protected. It also tried to do some other things like offer CE, insurance, and so forth, but its primary purpose was as a watchdog for EMS providers and as a lobbyist at the legislature. 4. After it got started, it had enough members to hire a legislative lobbyist to track legislation that could effect EMS, to work to kill legislation that was detrimental to EMS, and to promote legislation that was friendly to EMS. Without going into details, EMSAT was successful in killing a number of bills that would have been harmful to EMS. This was done by an organization that never achieved even 1% of the 50,000+ certificants in Texas. Why do Texas EMS people not want to join an organization that makes sense for them and costs little? There are many reasons. Big city firefighter EMS folks are generally union members, and they feel that their union takes care of their needs. They see themselves as members of their department, not as members of the Texas EMS family. So they see no reason to join. Others feel that they cannot afford the dues ($35) although the routinely spend that on pizza and beer. Others are simply not interested in what happens to them. Their motto is " Go with the flow. " If the state decides that chimpanzees can be EMTs, so be it. 5. One of the major failings was not having an office with a paid full-time person to answer the phone, keep books, handle memberships, write correspondence, and so forth. There simply was never enough money to do that. That probably was the one greatest thing that held EMSAT back. It's the old problem, you can't get eggs till you have chickens, but if you can't afford a chicken, you can't have any eggs. 6. Attempts were made to hire part-time people to work from home handling the business and contacts with members. One such individual was a disaster, while another did her best to keep things running and for a time improved the situation but, once again, the money was just not there due to lack of memberships. 7. Why won't people join EMSAT? There are many answers, but the number one reason is apathy. Many folks never knew about EMSAT, or if they did had a skewed understanding of what it did, or simply didn't see it as worth $35. When I was on the board, the most frequent question I got from prospective members was, " What's in it for me? " The second most frequent was " What has EMSAT done? " I thought I had good explanations for both those questions, but there seemed to be a notion that EMSAT had never done anything meaningful. Most folks do not follow the actions of the legislature and simply do not appreciate all the near misses EMSAT avoided through its lobbying activities and the bad things it helped keep from happening. That's a part of apathy. So people refused to join because they didn't think EMSAT had done anything, but EMSAT was hampered by not having enough revenue from memberships to maintain a staff and a lobbyist, so its lobbying efforts eventually failed, and it eventually reached its present state as a non-functional organization. For an organization to be able to make a difference, it has to have money. There has to be some trust somewhere. Some will say that EMSAT squandered its trust, and to an extent, that's true, because it has not always been responsive to members and prospective members, but again, without money, you can't do those things. 8. Throughout, as with any organization, there have been internecine spats among the board and the members, which didn't help, but in my judgment didn't sink the organization. What sunk the organization was lack of membership. 9. My comments are not meant to criticize ANYBODY. Ron Houssecker gave his heart and soul to EMSAT and to EMS. I know him well, and while I have not always agreed with him, I will defend until the death his dedication to EMS. The present President, Louis Molino, has done his best to keep things going. One man with a full-time job cannot run an organization like EMSAT and do anything but try to keep it from sliding under the waves. 10. Can EMSAT be salvaged? I doubt it. If only 500 people would join, it would be on solid footing once again, but if 500 people tried to join right now, I don't know how they would do it. Who would the contact to join? Who would process their memberships? Perhaps Lou can clarify this. 11. Texas NEEDS an organization like EMSAT. If all 50,000 of our certified/licensed personnel were members, do not think that the Texas Legislature would not listen to us. Case in point. I'm a lawyer, and I belong to the Texas Bar Association. I have no choice. I MUST belong and pay dues or I can't practice law. What do I get? Some lawyers say not much, but the TBA is one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the state. It has the ear of the legislature, big time. At EMSAT we once debated different ideas to increase membership, one of which was some way to link membership in EMSAT to certification. When I pay my annual Bar dues (well, now that I'm over 70 I don't have to pay them anymore), I automatically pay my dues to the Texas Bar. Perhaps some such arrangement might work for EMSAT. But don't hold your breath. I expect that if such a thing was proposed, there would be Tea Parties all over the place, and the proposal would quickly die. Bottom line: EMS folks are like cats. You love them or hate them, but you can't herd them. Gene Gandy, JD, LP, NREMT-P EMS Education and Consulting Tucson, AZ Re: EMSAT > > I tried to join a few months ago and could not make the website work > for > me. I intended to try again but forgot. I would still like to join and > support the effort. If EMSAT is a good idea (and I think it is), let's > not let the setback cause it to go away. So many individuals, > organizations and companies have seen very hard times before ultimate > success. There does appear to be a need for EMSAT as DSHS is the only > voice EMS has in the state. > > Perhaps this list can be used to determine what needs to be done and > the > directions EMSAT needs to go. That may well grow the organization and > yield even more interesting projects. > > I have tried the website again with no luck. So, this time I will just > put the requested information on a piece of paper, enclose an check > and > use snail-mail. Oh the anguish when technology fails! > > Be safe everyone and think about getting this organization into gear > again --- > > Dick -- EMT-B > Celina Fire Department > > > > > > Our BoD is down to Four. We have no support and extremely little > > intrest from anyone except for the occasional message here or to our > > info E-Mail address on our website which has no one maintaining it > > > > I could blame these facts on a variety of factors but I won't. I > will > > accept the blame as the current and to be frank likely the last > > President of EMSAT. > > > > In ways I am sorry and apologize to the whole of Trxas EMS but I do > > sleep soundly knowing I have tried my personal bet to build EMSAT. > > I've failed and that bothers me greatly. > > > > Louis N. Molino, Sr. CET > > FF/NREMT/FSI/ EMSI > > Typed by my fingers on my iPhone. > > Please excuse any typos. > > (Cell) > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > > > On Apr 19, 2010, at 20:48, Neil White > > wrote: > > > > > Anyone know if EMSAT is still going? If so, what projects do they > > > have going > > > at this time? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > -- > > > Neil White, RN, LP > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Just one more thought from me.... have any of these organizations that claim to represent EMS shown us why EMS as a whole (as opposed to just firefighters, volunteers, or private EMS) needs an umbrella voice? Are there issues that impact ALL of us in EMS and that require a unified voice? -Wes In a message dated 4/22/2010 4:22:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time, rick.moore@... writes: This is a great reply Gene, I know I was not aware of the history of EMSAT. I do have to say that I don’t know if it’s apathy or suspicion or economic issues but it really doesn’t seem to make any difference how productive an organization is if the proposed membership does not believe in it. TETAF is an organization that has full time staff, has a proven record of legislative awareness and has gotten farther with the proposed “platinum plan†for EMS CE than anyone else, yet the EMS division seems to struggle with participation and membership. Comments that I hear most often are that TETAF is all about trauma and hospitals and does nothing for EMS and EMS needs its own statewide organization, yet here is evidence that didn’t work either. I also have to say that we are inundated now days with associations and organizations on the local, state and national level that want our membership and insist they are the only ones who can provide the services we need. Add to that NR fees, state cert or license fees, fees for CE, subscriptions for journals, etc. that low $35.00 membership fee is now multiplied several times over. Sure we may spend that on pizza and beer, but at least pizza nourishes and beer hydrates. Unfortunately if I am having a tough time paying the bills and feeding my family any fees that are not required to maintain the license that allows me to perform my job are going to get cut from the budget. At this point I think that is the bigger reason EMSAT is where it’s at now and probably the reason it won’t bounce back anytime soon. Rick From: _texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem_ (mailto:texasems-l ) [mailto:_texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem_ (mailto:texasems-l ) ] On Behalf Of _wegandy1938@wegandy_ (mailto:wegandy1938@...) Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:22 PM To: _texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem_ (mailto:texasems-l ) Subject: Re: EMSAT I have held off commenting on EMSAT, not wanting to become a part of a kerfuffle, but perhaps I can help those who haven't been around for lebenty-eight years like me and Louis and Ron and so forth. I am a former board member and (I think) officer. It's been a while since I was involved, since I have spent much of my time out of Texas in the last few years but remain convinced that Texas has the best EMS of any state in the union. 1. At one time NAEMT had a presence in Texas, and it had local chapters, something EMSAT never did, and probably one of the reasons EMSAT failed. However, people also lost interest in NAEMT and it basically folded as a local entity in Texas. 2. About that time, Ron Haussecker and others, with the encouragement of the then Bureau Chief, formed EMSAT. It was formed as a tax exempt corporation and it had full IRS recognition as a tax free entity. There were also other attempts at starting organizations. I can't remember the names of any of them but none of them survived. Legally, EMSAT is a legitimate, legal, organization. It is a private organization as are most corporations, but it's no different from the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, or the Catholic Church. It is a charitable corporatioin. 3. EMSAT's mission was to monitor the actions of the legislature and what was then the Texas Department of Health to see what was going on and make sure that the interests of the rank and file EMS provider were promoted and protected. It also tried to do some other things like offer CE, insurance, and so forth, but its primary purpose was as a watchdog for EMS providers and as a lobbyist at the legislature. 4. After it got started, it had enough members to hire a legislative lobbyist to track legislation that could effect EMS, to work to kill legislation that was detrimental to EMS, and to promote legislation that was friendly to EMS. Without going into details, EMSAT was successful in killing a number of bills that would have been harmful to EMS. This was done by an organization that never achieved even 1% of the 50,000+ certificants in Texas. Why do Texas EMS people not want to join an organization that makes sense for them and costs little? There are many reasons. Big city firefighter EMS folks are generally union members, and they feel that their union takes care of their needs. They see themselves as members of their department, not as members of the Texas EMS family. So they see no reason to join. Others feel that they cannot afford the dues ($35) although the routinely spend that on pizza and beer. Others are simply not interested in what happens to them. Their motto is " Go with the flow. " If the state decides that chimpanzees can be EMTs, so be it. 5. One of the major failings was not having an office with a paid full-time person to answer the phone, keep books, handle memberships, write correspondence, and so forth. There simply was never enough money to do that. That probably was the one greatest thing that held EMSAT back. It's the old problem, you can't get eggs till you have chickens, but if you can't afford a chicken, you can't have any eggs. 6. Attempts were made to hire part-time people to work from home handling the business and contacts with members. One such individual was a disaster, while another did her best to keep things running and for a time improved the situation but, once again, the money was just not there due to lack of memberships. 7. Why won't people join EMSAT? There are many answers, but the number one reason is apathy. Many folks never knew about EMSAT, or if they did had a skewed understanding of what it did, or simply didn't see it as worth $35. When I was on the board, the most frequent question I got from prospective members was, " What's in it for me? " The second most frequent was " What has EMSAT done? " I thought I had good explanations for both those questions, but there seemed to be a notion that EMSAT had never done anything meaningful. Most folks do not follow the actions of the legislature and simply do not appreciate all the near misses EMSAT avoided through its lobbying activities and the bad things it helped keep from happening. That's a part of apathy. So people refused to join because they didn't think EMSAT had done anything, but EMSAT was hampered by not having enough revenue from memberships to maintain a staff and a lobbyist, so its lobbying efforts eventually failed, and it eventually reached its present state as a non-functional organization. For an organization to be able to make a difference, it has to have money. There has to be some trust somewhere. Some will say that EMSAT squandered its trust, and to an extent, that's true, because it has not always been responsive to members and prospective members, but again, without money, you can't do those things. 8. Throughout, as with any organization, there have been internecine spats among the board and the members, which didn't help, but in my judgment didn't sink the organization. What sunk the organization was lack of membership. 9. My comments are not meant to criticize ANYBODY. Ron Houssecker gave his heart and soul to EMSAT and to EMS. I know him well, and while I have not always agreed with him, I will defend until the death his dedication to EMS. The present President, Louis Molino, has done his best to keep things going. One man with a full-time job cannot run an organization like EMSAT and do anything but try to keep it from sliding under the waves. 10. Can EMSAT be salvaged? I doubt it. If only 500 people would join, it would be on solid footing once again, but if 500 people tried to join right now, I don't know how they would do it. Who would the contact to join? Who would process their memberships? Perhaps Lou can clarify this. 11. Texas NEEDS an organization like EMSAT. If all 50,000 of our certified/licensed personnel were members, do not think that the Texas Legislature would not listen to us. Case in point. I'm a lawyer, and I belong to the Texas Bar Association. I have no choice. I MUST belong and pay dues or I can't practice law. What do I get? Some lawyers say not much, but the TBA is one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the state. It has the ear of the legislature, big time. At EMSAT we once debated different ideas to increase membership, one of which was some way to link membership in EMSAT to certification. When I pay my annual Bar dues (well, now that I'm over 70 I don't have to pay them anymore), I automatically pay my dues to the Texas Bar. Perhaps some such arrangement might work for EMSAT. But don't hold your breath. I expect that if such a thing was proposed, there would be Tea Parties all over the place, and the proposal would quickly die. Bottom line: EMS folks are like cats. You love them or hate them, but you can't herd them. Gene Gandy, JD, LP, NREMT-P EMS Education and Consulting Tucson, AZ Re: EMSAT > > I tried to join a few months ago and could not make the website work > for > me. I intended to try again but forgot. I would still like to join and > support the effort. If EMSAT is a good idea (and I think it is), let's > not let the setback cause it to go away. So many individuals, > organizations and companies have seen very hard times before ultimate > success. There does appear to be a need for EMSAT as DSHS is the only > voice EMS has in the state. > > Perhaps this list can be used to determine what needs to be done and > the > directions EMSAT needs to go. That may well grow the organization and > yield even more interesting projects. > > I have tried the website again with no luck. So, this time I will just > put the requested information on a piece of paper, enclose an check > and > use snail-mail. Oh the anguish when technology fails! > > Be safe everyone and think about getting this organization into gear > again --- > > Dick -- EMT-B > Celina Fire Department > > > > > > Our BoD is down to Four. We have no support and extremely little > > intrest from anyone except for the occasional message here or to our > > info E-Mail address on our website which has no one maintaining it > > > > I could blame these facts on a variety of factors but I won't. I > will > > accept the blame as the current and to be frank likely the last > > President of EMSAT. > > > > In ways I am sorry and apologize to the whole of Trxas EMS but I do > > sleep soundly knowing I have tried my personal bet to build EMSAT. > > I've failed and that bothers me greatly. > > > > Louis N. Molino, Sr. CET > > FF/NREMT/FSI/ EMSI > > Typed by my fingers on my iPhone. > > Please excuse any typos. > > (Cell) > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > > > On Apr 19, 2010, at 20:48, Neil White > > wrote: > > > > > Anyone know if EMSAT is still going? If so, what projects do they > > > have going > > > at this time? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > -- > > > Neil White, RN, LP > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 This is a great reply Gene, I know I was not aware of the history of EMSAT. I do have to say that I don’t know if it’s apathy or suspicion or economic issues but it really doesn’t seem to make any difference how productive an organization is if the proposed membership does not believe in it. TETAF is an organization that has full time staff, has a proven record of legislative awareness and has gotten farther with the proposed “platinum plan†for EMS CE than anyone else, yet the EMS division seems to struggle with participation and membership. Comments that I hear most often are that TETAF is all about trauma and hospitals and does nothing for EMS and EMS needs its own statewide organization, yet here is evidence that didn’t work either. I also have to say that we are inundated now days with associations and organizations on the local, state and national level that want our membership and insist they are the only ones who can provide the services we need. Add to that NR fees, state cert or license fees, fees for CE, subscriptions for journals, etc. that low $35.00 membership fee is now multiplied several times over. Sure we may spend that on pizza and beer, but at least pizza nourishes and beer hydrates. Unfortunately if I am having a tough time paying the bills and feeding my family any fees that are not required to maintain the license that allows me to perform my job are going to get cut from the budget. At this point I think that is the bigger reason EMSAT is where it’s at now and probably the reason it won’t bounce back anytime soon. Rick From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of wegandy1938@... Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:22 PM To: texasems-l Subject: Re: EMSAT I have held off commenting on EMSAT, not wanting to become a part of a kerfuffle, but perhaps I can help those who haven't been around for lebenty-eight years like me and Louis and Ron and so forth. I am a former board member and (I think) officer. It's been a while since I was involved, since I have spent much of my time out of Texas in the last few years but remain convinced that Texas has the best EMS of any state in the union. 1. At one time NAEMT had a presence in Texas, and it had local chapters, something EMSAT never did, and probably one of the reasons EMSAT failed. However, people also lost interest in NAEMT and it basically folded as a local entity in Texas. 2. About that time, Ron Haussecker and others, with the encouragement of the then Bureau Chief, formed EMSAT. It was formed as a tax exempt corporation and it had full IRS recognition as a tax free entity. There were also other attempts at starting organizations. I can't remember the names of any of them but none of them survived. Legally, EMSAT is a legitimate, legal, organization. It is a private organization as are most corporations, but it's no different from the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, or the Catholic Church. It is a charitable corporatioin. 3. EMSAT's mission was to monitor the actions of the legislature and what was then the Texas Department of Health to see what was going on and make sure that the interests of the rank and file EMS provider were promoted and protected. It also tried to do some other things like offer CE, insurance, and so forth, but its primary purpose was as a watchdog for EMS providers and as a lobbyist at the legislature. 4. After it got started, it had enough members to hire a legislative lobbyist to track legislation that could effect EMS, to work to kill legislation that was detrimental to EMS, and to promote legislation that was friendly to EMS. Without going into details, EMSAT was successful in killing a number of bills that would have been harmful to EMS. This was done by an organization that never achieved even 1% of the 50,000+ certificants in Texas. Why do Texas EMS people not want to join an organization that makes sense for them and costs little? There are many reasons. Big city firefighter EMS folks are generally union members, and they feel that their union takes care of their needs. They see themselves as members of their department, not as members of the Texas EMS family. So they see no reason to join. Others feel that they cannot afford the dues ($35) although the routinely spend that on pizza and beer. Others are simply not interested in what happens to them. Their motto is " Go with the flow. " If the state decides that chimpanzees can be EMTs, so be it. 5. One of the major failings was not having an office with a paid full-time person to answer the phone, keep books, handle memberships, write correspondence, and so forth. There simply was never enough money to do that. That probably was the one greatest thing that held EMSAT back. It's the old problem, you can't get eggs till you have chickens, but if you can't afford a chicken, you can't have any eggs. 6. Attempts were made to hire part-time people to work from home handling the business and contacts with members. One such individual was a disaster, while another did her best to keep things running and for a time improved the situation but, once again, the money was just not there due to lack of memberships. 7. Why won't people join EMSAT? There are many answers, but the number one reason is apathy. Many folks never knew about EMSAT, or if they did had a skewed understanding of what it did, or simply didn't see it as worth $35. When I was on the board, the most frequent question I got from prospective members was, " What's in it for me? " The second most frequent was " What has EMSAT done? " I thought I had good explanations for both those questions, but there seemed to be a notion that EMSAT had never done anything meaningful. Most folks do not follow the actions of the legislature and simply do not appreciate all the near misses EMSAT avoided through its lobbying activities and the bad things it helped keep from happening. That's a part of apathy. So people refused to join because they didn't think EMSAT had done anything, but EMSAT was hampered by not having enough revenue from memberships to maintain a staff and a lobbyist, so its lobbying efforts eventually failed, and it eventually reached its present state as a non-functional organization. For an organization to be able to make a difference, it has to have money. There has to be some trust somewhere. Some will say that EMSAT squandered its trust, and to an extent, that's true, because it has not always been responsive to members and prospective members, but again, without money, you can't do those things. 8. Throughout, as with any organization, there have been internecine spats among the board and the members, which didn't help, but in my judgment didn't sink the organization. What sunk the organization was lack of membership. 9. My comments are not meant to criticize ANYBODY. Ron Houssecker gave his heart and soul to EMSAT and to EMS. I know him well, and while I have not always agreed with him, I will defend until the death his dedication to EMS. The present President, Louis Molino, has done his best to keep things going. One man with a full-time job cannot run an organization like EMSAT and do anything but try to keep it from sliding under the waves. 10. Can EMSAT be salvaged? I doubt it. If only 500 people would join, it would be on solid footing once again, but if 500 people tried to join right now, I don't know how they would do it. Who would the contact to join? Who would process their memberships? Perhaps Lou can clarify this. 11. Texas NEEDS an organization like EMSAT. If all 50,000 of our certified/licensed personnel were members, do not think that the Texas Legislature would not listen to us. Case in point. I'm a lawyer, and I belong to the Texas Bar Association. I have no choice. I MUST belong and pay dues or I can't practice law. What do I get? Some lawyers say not much, but the TBA is one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the state. It has the ear of the legislature, big time. At EMSAT we once debated different ideas to increase membership, one of which was some way to link membership in EMSAT to certification. When I pay my annual Bar dues (well, now that I'm over 70 I don't have to pay them anymore), I automatically pay my dues to the Texas Bar. Perhaps some such arrangement might work for EMSAT. But don't hold your breath. I expect that if such a thing was proposed, there would be Tea Parties all over the place, and the proposal would quickly die. Bottom line: EMS folks are like cats. You love them or hate them, but you can't herd them. Gene Gandy, JD, LP, NREMT-P EMS Education and Consulting Tucson, AZ Re: EMSAT Ok, you two, we can all point fingers at each other, but what good will that do? Maybe this right here is why EMSAT is no more, too much fighting among ourselves and over the way an association should be run. This only shows that we as a group of EMS personnel can't even get along long enough to help EMS in Texas. We all have our views and opinions on what we want EMS in Texas to be. We also know that the next person may not see it the way we do, or they may see something totally different then someone else. I'm not a member of EMSAT, but tried to be after the last EMS Conference, but the address was not accepting mail. If you want to re-organize this group, then maybe new people need to take it over. As long as we fight among ourselves, no one will want to join. Just my $0.02 worth. Wayne > > > > > Anyone know if EMSAT is still going? If so, what projects do they > > > have going > > > at this time? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > -- > > > Neil White, RN, LP > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 This is a great reply Gene, I know I was not aware of the history of EMSAT. I do have to say that I don’t know if it’s apathy or suspicion or economic issues but it really doesn’t seem to make any difference how productive an organization is if the proposed membership does not believe in it. TETAF is an organization that has full time staff, has a proven record of legislative awareness and has gotten farther with the proposed “platinum plan†for EMS CE than anyone else, yet the EMS division seems to struggle with participation and membership. Comments that I hear most often are that TETAF is all about trauma and hospitals and does nothing for EMS and EMS needs its own statewide organization, yet here is evidence that didn’t work either. I also have to say that we are inundated now days with associations and organizations on the local, state and national level that want our membership and insist they are the only ones who can provide the services we need. Add to that NR fees, state cert or license fees, fees for CE, subscriptions for journals, etc. that low $35.00 membership fee is now multiplied several times over. Sure we may spend that on pizza and beer, but at least pizza nourishes and beer hydrates. Unfortunately if I am having a tough time paying the bills and feeding my family any fees that are not required to maintain the license that allows me to perform my job are going to get cut from the budget. At this point I think that is the bigger reason EMSAT is where it’s at now and probably the reason it won’t bounce back anytime soon. Rick From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of wegandy1938@... Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:22 PM To: texasems-l Subject: Re: EMSAT I have held off commenting on EMSAT, not wanting to become a part of a kerfuffle, but perhaps I can help those who haven't been around for lebenty-eight years like me and Louis and Ron and so forth. I am a former board member and (I think) officer. It's been a while since I was involved, since I have spent much of my time out of Texas in the last few years but remain convinced that Texas has the best EMS of any state in the union. 1. At one time NAEMT had a presence in Texas, and it had local chapters, something EMSAT never did, and probably one of the reasons EMSAT failed. However, people also lost interest in NAEMT and it basically folded as a local entity in Texas. 2. About that time, Ron Haussecker and others, with the encouragement of the then Bureau Chief, formed EMSAT. It was formed as a tax exempt corporation and it had full IRS recognition as a tax free entity. There were also other attempts at starting organizations. I can't remember the names of any of them but none of them survived. Legally, EMSAT is a legitimate, legal, organization. It is a private organization as are most corporations, but it's no different from the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, or the Catholic Church. It is a charitable corporatioin. 3. EMSAT's mission was to monitor the actions of the legislature and what was then the Texas Department of Health to see what was going on and make sure that the interests of the rank and file EMS provider were promoted and protected. It also tried to do some other things like offer CE, insurance, and so forth, but its primary purpose was as a watchdog for EMS providers and as a lobbyist at the legislature. 4. After it got started, it had enough members to hire a legislative lobbyist to track legislation that could effect EMS, to work to kill legislation that was detrimental to EMS, and to promote legislation that was friendly to EMS. Without going into details, EMSAT was successful in killing a number of bills that would have been harmful to EMS. This was done by an organization that never achieved even 1% of the 50,000+ certificants in Texas. Why do Texas EMS people not want to join an organization that makes sense for them and costs little? There are many reasons. Big city firefighter EMS folks are generally union members, and they feel that their union takes care of their needs. They see themselves as members of their department, not as members of the Texas EMS family. So they see no reason to join. Others feel that they cannot afford the dues ($35) although the routinely spend that on pizza and beer. Others are simply not interested in what happens to them. Their motto is " Go with the flow. " If the state decides that chimpanzees can be EMTs, so be it. 5. One of the major failings was not having an office with a paid full-time person to answer the phone, keep books, handle memberships, write correspondence, and so forth. There simply was never enough money to do that. That probably was the one greatest thing that held EMSAT back. It's the old problem, you can't get eggs till you have chickens, but if you can't afford a chicken, you can't have any eggs. 6. Attempts were made to hire part-time people to work from home handling the business and contacts with members. One such individual was a disaster, while another did her best to keep things running and for a time improved the situation but, once again, the money was just not there due to lack of memberships. 7. Why won't people join EMSAT? There are many answers, but the number one reason is apathy. Many folks never knew about EMSAT, or if they did had a skewed understanding of what it did, or simply didn't see it as worth $35. When I was on the board, the most frequent question I got from prospective members was, " What's in it for me? " The second most frequent was " What has EMSAT done? " I thought I had good explanations for both those questions, but there seemed to be a notion that EMSAT had never done anything meaningful. Most folks do not follow the actions of the legislature and simply do not appreciate all the near misses EMSAT avoided through its lobbying activities and the bad things it helped keep from happening. That's a part of apathy. So people refused to join because they didn't think EMSAT had done anything, but EMSAT was hampered by not having enough revenue from memberships to maintain a staff and a lobbyist, so its lobbying efforts eventually failed, and it eventually reached its present state as a non-functional organization. For an organization to be able to make a difference, it has to have money. There has to be some trust somewhere. Some will say that EMSAT squandered its trust, and to an extent, that's true, because it has not always been responsive to members and prospective members, but again, without money, you can't do those things. 8. Throughout, as with any organization, there have been internecine spats among the board and the members, which didn't help, but in my judgment didn't sink the organization. What sunk the organization was lack of membership. 9. My comments are not meant to criticize ANYBODY. Ron Houssecker gave his heart and soul to EMSAT and to EMS. I know him well, and while I have not always agreed with him, I will defend until the death his dedication to EMS. The present President, Louis Molino, has done his best to keep things going. One man with a full-time job cannot run an organization like EMSAT and do anything but try to keep it from sliding under the waves. 10. Can EMSAT be salvaged? I doubt it. If only 500 people would join, it would be on solid footing once again, but if 500 people tried to join right now, I don't know how they would do it. Who would the contact to join? Who would process their memberships? Perhaps Lou can clarify this. 11. Texas NEEDS an organization like EMSAT. If all 50,000 of our certified/licensed personnel were members, do not think that the Texas Legislature would not listen to us. Case in point. I'm a lawyer, and I belong to the Texas Bar Association. I have no choice. I MUST belong and pay dues or I can't practice law. What do I get? Some lawyers say not much, but the TBA is one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the state. It has the ear of the legislature, big time. At EMSAT we once debated different ideas to increase membership, one of which was some way to link membership in EMSAT to certification. When I pay my annual Bar dues (well, now that I'm over 70 I don't have to pay them anymore), I automatically pay my dues to the Texas Bar. Perhaps some such arrangement might work for EMSAT. But don't hold your breath. I expect that if such a thing was proposed, there would be Tea Parties all over the place, and the proposal would quickly die. Bottom line: EMS folks are like cats. You love them or hate them, but you can't herd them. Gene Gandy, JD, LP, NREMT-P EMS Education and Consulting Tucson, AZ Re: EMSAT Ok, you two, we can all point fingers at each other, but what good will that do? Maybe this right here is why EMSAT is no more, too much fighting among ourselves and over the way an association should be run. This only shows that we as a group of EMS personnel can't even get along long enough to help EMS in Texas. We all have our views and opinions on what we want EMS in Texas to be. We also know that the next person may not see it the way we do, or they may see something totally different then someone else. I'm not a member of EMSAT, but tried to be after the last EMS Conference, but the address was not accepting mail. If you want to re-organize this group, then maybe new people need to take it over. As long as we fight among ourselves, no one will want to join. Just my $0.02 worth. Wayne > > > > > Anyone know if EMSAT is still going? If so, what projects do they > > > have going > > > at this time? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > -- > > > Neil White, RN, LP > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 This is a great reply Gene, I know I was not aware of the history of EMSAT. I do have to say that I don’t know if it’s apathy or suspicion or economic issues but it really doesn’t seem to make any difference how productive an organization is if the proposed membership does not believe in it. TETAF is an organization that has full time staff, has a proven record of legislative awareness and has gotten farther with the proposed “platinum plan†for EMS CE than anyone else, yet the EMS division seems to struggle with participation and membership. Comments that I hear most often are that TETAF is all about trauma and hospitals and does nothing for EMS and EMS needs its own statewide organization, yet here is evidence that didn’t work either. I also have to say that we are inundated now days with associations and organizations on the local, state and national level that want our membership and insist they are the only ones who can provide the services we need. Add to that NR fees, state cert or license fees, fees for CE, subscriptions for journals, etc. that low $35.00 membership fee is now multiplied several times over. Sure we may spend that on pizza and beer, but at least pizza nourishes and beer hydrates. Unfortunately if I am having a tough time paying the bills and feeding my family any fees that are not required to maintain the license that allows me to perform my job are going to get cut from the budget. At this point I think that is the bigger reason EMSAT is where it’s at now and probably the reason it won’t bounce back anytime soon. Rick From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of wegandy1938@... Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:22 PM To: texasems-l Subject: Re: EMSAT I have held off commenting on EMSAT, not wanting to become a part of a kerfuffle, but perhaps I can help those who haven't been around for lebenty-eight years like me and Louis and Ron and so forth. I am a former board member and (I think) officer. It's been a while since I was involved, since I have spent much of my time out of Texas in the last few years but remain convinced that Texas has the best EMS of any state in the union. 1. At one time NAEMT had a presence in Texas, and it had local chapters, something EMSAT never did, and probably one of the reasons EMSAT failed. However, people also lost interest in NAEMT and it basically folded as a local entity in Texas. 2. About that time, Ron Haussecker and others, with the encouragement of the then Bureau Chief, formed EMSAT. It was formed as a tax exempt corporation and it had full IRS recognition as a tax free entity. There were also other attempts at starting organizations. I can't remember the names of any of them but none of them survived. Legally, EMSAT is a legitimate, legal, organization. It is a private organization as are most corporations, but it's no different from the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, or the Catholic Church. It is a charitable corporatioin. 3. EMSAT's mission was to monitor the actions of the legislature and what was then the Texas Department of Health to see what was going on and make sure that the interests of the rank and file EMS provider were promoted and protected. It also tried to do some other things like offer CE, insurance, and so forth, but its primary purpose was as a watchdog for EMS providers and as a lobbyist at the legislature. 4. After it got started, it had enough members to hire a legislative lobbyist to track legislation that could effect EMS, to work to kill legislation that was detrimental to EMS, and to promote legislation that was friendly to EMS. Without going into details, EMSAT was successful in killing a number of bills that would have been harmful to EMS. This was done by an organization that never achieved even 1% of the 50,000+ certificants in Texas. Why do Texas EMS people not want to join an organization that makes sense for them and costs little? There are many reasons. Big city firefighter EMS folks are generally union members, and they feel that their union takes care of their needs. They see themselves as members of their department, not as members of the Texas EMS family. So they see no reason to join. Others feel that they cannot afford the dues ($35) although the routinely spend that on pizza and beer. Others are simply not interested in what happens to them. Their motto is " Go with the flow. " If the state decides that chimpanzees can be EMTs, so be it. 5. One of the major failings was not having an office with a paid full-time person to answer the phone, keep books, handle memberships, write correspondence, and so forth. There simply was never enough money to do that. That probably was the one greatest thing that held EMSAT back. It's the old problem, you can't get eggs till you have chickens, but if you can't afford a chicken, you can't have any eggs. 6. Attempts were made to hire part-time people to work from home handling the business and contacts with members. One such individual was a disaster, while another did her best to keep things running and for a time improved the situation but, once again, the money was just not there due to lack of memberships. 7. Why won't people join EMSAT? There are many answers, but the number one reason is apathy. Many folks never knew about EMSAT, or if they did had a skewed understanding of what it did, or simply didn't see it as worth $35. When I was on the board, the most frequent question I got from prospective members was, " What's in it for me? " The second most frequent was " What has EMSAT done? " I thought I had good explanations for both those questions, but there seemed to be a notion that EMSAT had never done anything meaningful. Most folks do not follow the actions of the legislature and simply do not appreciate all the near misses EMSAT avoided through its lobbying activities and the bad things it helped keep from happening. That's a part of apathy. So people refused to join because they didn't think EMSAT had done anything, but EMSAT was hampered by not having enough revenue from memberships to maintain a staff and a lobbyist, so its lobbying efforts eventually failed, and it eventually reached its present state as a non-functional organization. For an organization to be able to make a difference, it has to have money. There has to be some trust somewhere. Some will say that EMSAT squandered its trust, and to an extent, that's true, because it has not always been responsive to members and prospective members, but again, without money, you can't do those things. 8. Throughout, as with any organization, there have been internecine spats among the board and the members, which didn't help, but in my judgment didn't sink the organization. What sunk the organization was lack of membership. 9. My comments are not meant to criticize ANYBODY. Ron Houssecker gave his heart and soul to EMSAT and to EMS. I know him well, and while I have not always agreed with him, I will defend until the death his dedication to EMS. The present President, Louis Molino, has done his best to keep things going. One man with a full-time job cannot run an organization like EMSAT and do anything but try to keep it from sliding under the waves. 10. Can EMSAT be salvaged? I doubt it. If only 500 people would join, it would be on solid footing once again, but if 500 people tried to join right now, I don't know how they would do it. Who would the contact to join? Who would process their memberships? Perhaps Lou can clarify this. 11. Texas NEEDS an organization like EMSAT. If all 50,000 of our certified/licensed personnel were members, do not think that the Texas Legislature would not listen to us. Case in point. I'm a lawyer, and I belong to the Texas Bar Association. I have no choice. I MUST belong and pay dues or I can't practice law. What do I get? Some lawyers say not much, but the TBA is one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the state. It has the ear of the legislature, big time. At EMSAT we once debated different ideas to increase membership, one of which was some way to link membership in EMSAT to certification. When I pay my annual Bar dues (well, now that I'm over 70 I don't have to pay them anymore), I automatically pay my dues to the Texas Bar. Perhaps some such arrangement might work for EMSAT. But don't hold your breath. I expect that if such a thing was proposed, there would be Tea Parties all over the place, and the proposal would quickly die. Bottom line: EMS folks are like cats. You love them or hate them, but you can't herd them. Gene Gandy, JD, LP, NREMT-P EMS Education and Consulting Tucson, AZ Re: EMSAT Ok, you two, we can all point fingers at each other, but what good will that do? Maybe this right here is why EMSAT is no more, too much fighting among ourselves and over the way an association should be run. This only shows that we as a group of EMS personnel can't even get along long enough to help EMS in Texas. We all have our views and opinions on what we want EMS in Texas to be. We also know that the next person may not see it the way we do, or they may see something totally different then someone else. I'm not a member of EMSAT, but tried to be after the last EMS Conference, but the address was not accepting mail. If you want to re-organize this group, then maybe new people need to take it over. As long as we fight among ourselves, no one will want to join. Just my $0.02 worth. Wayne > > > > > Anyone know if EMSAT is still going? If so, what projects do they > > > have going > > > at this time? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > -- > > > Neil White, RN, LP > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 I have lived in Texas my entire life. My entire career, 27 years now, including urban, suburban, rural, fire and EMS, has been in the greater Austin area. I am a former member of the Board of Directors of EMSAT. EMS is different everywhere you go, and therefore, the problems faced by the individual provider are different. EMS is different in Austin (third-service municipal, supported by a City fire department) than it is in on County (county service, supported by numerous paid and volunteer fire departments), which in turn is different than Burnet County (fire-based in half the county, separate county? service in another part, also supported by a few paid but mostly volunteer fire departments), which in turn is different than Llano County (hospital based, with very few first responders at all). Employees of each of these agencies have different problems, and those problems have different solutions. The first responders who support those agencies, obviously also EMS providers in their own rights, have another set of problems. For a single organization to be the solution to every individual's problem, especially when the needs of the Texas EMS community are so diverse, is a monumental problem that has so far proven to be insurmountable. The big-picture, future-generations issue of whether Paramedic should be a certificate or degree program is completely irrelevant if the nearest EMS program of any type is 100 miles away, costs too much for folks to afford, or is only offered during the time volunteers are trying to earn money to feed their families. A volunteer EMT in Llano has vastly different needs than I do as an Austin Fire Department employee.  Some folks, Ron Hausseker being a fine example, have the drive and mental capacity to watch their local agencies while simultaneously keeping up with state- and national EMS issues. I have always stood in awe of people like Ron. I, like many people, have occasionally disagreed with Ron, but I have always respected his ability to keep all the issues straight and understand how those issues will affect us. Agree or disagree with his position on the various EMS issues, I don't think there's a person on the planet who could doubt his drive and commitment to EMS. Again, I am awed. People of Ron's caliber don't happen often.  But as we've seen, Ron can't do it by himself. Until an issue comes up that causes a big enough problem for a large enough number of EMS providers, I don't think enough of us will show enough interest to support a state-wide EMS association.  My two cents, if it's even worth that much.  Phil Reynolds Jr. 115 Harold Dr. Burnet, TX., 78611 HP CP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 I have lived in Texas my entire life. My entire career, 27 years now, including urban, suburban, rural, fire and EMS, has been in the greater Austin area. I am a former member of the Board of Directors of EMSAT. EMS is different everywhere you go, and therefore, the problems faced by the individual provider are different. EMS is different in Austin (third-service municipal, supported by a City fire department) than it is in on County (county service, supported by numerous paid and volunteer fire departments), which in turn is different than Burnet County (fire-based in half the county, separate county? service in another part, also supported by a few paid but mostly volunteer fire departments), which in turn is different than Llano County (hospital based, with very few first responders at all). Employees of each of these agencies have different problems, and those problems have different solutions. The first responders who support those agencies, obviously also EMS providers in their own rights, have another set of problems. For a single organization to be the solution to every individual's problem, especially when the needs of the Texas EMS community are so diverse, is a monumental problem that has so far proven to be insurmountable. The big-picture, future-generations issue of whether Paramedic should be a certificate or degree program is completely irrelevant if the nearest EMS program of any type is 100 miles away, costs too much for folks to afford, or is only offered during the time volunteers are trying to earn money to feed their families. A volunteer EMT in Llano has vastly different needs than I do as an Austin Fire Department employee.  Some folks, Ron Hausseker being a fine example, have the drive and mental capacity to watch their local agencies while simultaneously keeping up with state- and national EMS issues. I have always stood in awe of people like Ron. I, like many people, have occasionally disagreed with Ron, but I have always respected his ability to keep all the issues straight and understand how those issues will affect us. Agree or disagree with his position on the various EMS issues, I don't think there's a person on the planet who could doubt his drive and commitment to EMS. Again, I am awed. People of Ron's caliber don't happen often.  But as we've seen, Ron can't do it by himself. Until an issue comes up that causes a big enough problem for a large enough number of EMS providers, I don't think enough of us will show enough interest to support a state-wide EMS association.  My two cents, if it's even worth that much.  Phil Reynolds Jr. 115 Harold Dr. Burnet, TX., 78611 HP CP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 I have lived in Texas my entire life. My entire career, 27 years now, including urban, suburban, rural, fire and EMS, has been in the greater Austin area. I am a former member of the Board of Directors of EMSAT. EMS is different everywhere you go, and therefore, the problems faced by the individual provider are different. EMS is different in Austin (third-service municipal, supported by a City fire department) than it is in on County (county service, supported by numerous paid and volunteer fire departments), which in turn is different than Burnet County (fire-based in half the county, separate county? service in another part, also supported by a few paid but mostly volunteer fire departments), which in turn is different than Llano County (hospital based, with very few first responders at all). Employees of each of these agencies have different problems, and those problems have different solutions. The first responders who support those agencies, obviously also EMS providers in their own rights, have another set of problems. For a single organization to be the solution to every individual's problem, especially when the needs of the Texas EMS community are so diverse, is a monumental problem that has so far proven to be insurmountable. The big-picture, future-generations issue of whether Paramedic should be a certificate or degree program is completely irrelevant if the nearest EMS program of any type is 100 miles away, costs too much for folks to afford, or is only offered during the time volunteers are trying to earn money to feed their families. A volunteer EMT in Llano has vastly different needs than I do as an Austin Fire Department employee.  Some folks, Ron Hausseker being a fine example, have the drive and mental capacity to watch their local agencies while simultaneously keeping up with state- and national EMS issues. I have always stood in awe of people like Ron. I, like many people, have occasionally disagreed with Ron, but I have always respected his ability to keep all the issues straight and understand how those issues will affect us. Agree or disagree with his position on the various EMS issues, I don't think there's a person on the planet who could doubt his drive and commitment to EMS. Again, I am awed. People of Ron's caliber don't happen often.  But as we've seen, Ron can't do it by himself. Until an issue comes up that causes a big enough problem for a large enough number of EMS providers, I don't think enough of us will show enough interest to support a state-wide EMS association.  My two cents, if it's even worth that much.  Phil Reynolds Jr. 115 Harold Dr. Burnet, TX., 78611 HP CP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2010 Report Share Posted May 9, 2010 Thanks for the responses. I think I counted 37, but my question was never really answered. I'm going to assume the organization is on hold for now..... Thanks again, Neil > > > I have lived in Texas my entire life. My entire career, 27 years now, > including urban, suburban, rural, fire and EMS, has been in the greater > Austin area. I am a former member of the Board of Directors of EMSAT. > > EMS is different everywhere you go, and therefore, the problems faced by > the individual provider are different. EMS is different in Austin > (third-service municipal, supported by a City fire department) than it is in > on County (county service, supported by numerous paid and volunteer > fire departments), which in turn is different than Burnet County (fire-based > in half the county, separate county? service in another part, also supported > by a few paid but mostly volunteer fire departments), which in turn is > different than Llano County (hospital based, with very few first responders > at all). Employees of each of these agencies have different problems, and > those problems have different solutions. The first responders who support > those agencies, obviously also EMS providers in their own rights, have > another set of problems. > > For a single organization to be the solution to every individual's problem, > especially when the needs of the Texas EMS community are so diverse, is a > monumental problem that has so far proven to be insurmountable. The > big-picture, future-generations issue of whether Paramedic should be a > certificate or degree program is completely irrelevant if the nearest EMS > program of any type is 100 miles away, costs too much for folks to afford, > or is only offered during the time volunteers are trying to earn money to > feed their families. A volunteer EMT in Llano has vastly different needs > than I do as an Austin Fire Department employee. > > Some folks, Ron Hausseker being a fine example, have the drive and mental > capacity to watch their local agencies while simultaneously keeping up with > state- and national EMS issues. I have always stood in awe of people > like Ron. I, like many people, have occasionally disagreed with Ron, but I > have always respected his ability to keep all the issues straight and > understand how those issues will affect us. Agree or disagree with his > position on the various EMS issues, I don't think there's a person on the > planet who could doubt his drive and commitment to EMS. Again, I am awed. > People of Ron's caliber don't happen often. > > But as we've seen, Ron can't do it by himself. Until an issue comes up > that causes a big enough problem for a large enough number of EMS providers, > I don't think enough of us will show enough interest to support a state-wide > EMS association. > > My two cents, if it's even worth that much. > > Phil Reynolds Jr. > 115 Harold Dr. > Burnet, TX., 78611 > HP > CP > > > -- Neil White, RN, LP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2010 Report Share Posted May 9, 2010 Thanks for the responses. I think I counted 37, but my question was never really answered. I'm going to assume the organization is on hold for now..... Thanks again, Neil > > > I have lived in Texas my entire life. My entire career, 27 years now, > including urban, suburban, rural, fire and EMS, has been in the greater > Austin area. I am a former member of the Board of Directors of EMSAT. > > EMS is different everywhere you go, and therefore, the problems faced by > the individual provider are different. EMS is different in Austin > (third-service municipal, supported by a City fire department) than it is in > on County (county service, supported by numerous paid and volunteer > fire departments), which in turn is different than Burnet County (fire-based > in half the county, separate county? service in another part, also supported > by a few paid but mostly volunteer fire departments), which in turn is > different than Llano County (hospital based, with very few first responders > at all). Employees of each of these agencies have different problems, and > those problems have different solutions. The first responders who support > those agencies, obviously also EMS providers in their own rights, have > another set of problems. > > For a single organization to be the solution to every individual's problem, > especially when the needs of the Texas EMS community are so diverse, is a > monumental problem that has so far proven to be insurmountable. The > big-picture, future-generations issue of whether Paramedic should be a > certificate or degree program is completely irrelevant if the nearest EMS > program of any type is 100 miles away, costs too much for folks to afford, > or is only offered during the time volunteers are trying to earn money to > feed their families. A volunteer EMT in Llano has vastly different needs > than I do as an Austin Fire Department employee. > > Some folks, Ron Hausseker being a fine example, have the drive and mental > capacity to watch their local agencies while simultaneously keeping up with > state- and national EMS issues. I have always stood in awe of people > like Ron. I, like many people, have occasionally disagreed with Ron, but I > have always respected his ability to keep all the issues straight and > understand how those issues will affect us. Agree or disagree with his > position on the various EMS issues, I don't think there's a person on the > planet who could doubt his drive and commitment to EMS. Again, I am awed. > People of Ron's caliber don't happen often. > > But as we've seen, Ron can't do it by himself. Until an issue comes up > that causes a big enough problem for a large enough number of EMS providers, > I don't think enough of us will show enough interest to support a state-wide > EMS association. > > My two cents, if it's even worth that much. > > Phil Reynolds Jr. > 115 Harold Dr. > Burnet, TX., 78611 > HP > CP > > > -- Neil White, RN, LP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2010 Report Share Posted May 9, 2010 Thanks for the responses. I think I counted 37, but my question was never really answered. I'm going to assume the organization is on hold for now..... Thanks again, Neil > > > I have lived in Texas my entire life. My entire career, 27 years now, > including urban, suburban, rural, fire and EMS, has been in the greater > Austin area. I am a former member of the Board of Directors of EMSAT. > > EMS is different everywhere you go, and therefore, the problems faced by > the individual provider are different. EMS is different in Austin > (third-service municipal, supported by a City fire department) than it is in > on County (county service, supported by numerous paid and volunteer > fire departments), which in turn is different than Burnet County (fire-based > in half the county, separate county? service in another part, also supported > by a few paid but mostly volunteer fire departments), which in turn is > different than Llano County (hospital based, with very few first responders > at all). Employees of each of these agencies have different problems, and > those problems have different solutions. The first responders who support > those agencies, obviously also EMS providers in their own rights, have > another set of problems. > > For a single organization to be the solution to every individual's problem, > especially when the needs of the Texas EMS community are so diverse, is a > monumental problem that has so far proven to be insurmountable. The > big-picture, future-generations issue of whether Paramedic should be a > certificate or degree program is completely irrelevant if the nearest EMS > program of any type is 100 miles away, costs too much for folks to afford, > or is only offered during the time volunteers are trying to earn money to > feed their families. A volunteer EMT in Llano has vastly different needs > than I do as an Austin Fire Department employee. > > Some folks, Ron Hausseker being a fine example, have the drive and mental > capacity to watch their local agencies while simultaneously keeping up with > state- and national EMS issues. I have always stood in awe of people > like Ron. I, like many people, have occasionally disagreed with Ron, but I > have always respected his ability to keep all the issues straight and > understand how those issues will affect us. Agree or disagree with his > position on the various EMS issues, I don't think there's a person on the > planet who could doubt his drive and commitment to EMS. Again, I am awed. > People of Ron's caliber don't happen often. > > But as we've seen, Ron can't do it by himself. Until an issue comes up > that causes a big enough problem for a large enough number of EMS providers, > I don't think enough of us will show enough interest to support a state-wide > EMS association. > > My two cents, if it's even worth that much. > > Phil Reynolds Jr. > 115 Harold Dr. > Burnet, TX., 78611 > HP > CP > > > -- Neil White, RN, LP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.