Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

At least they can return fire!

Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET

FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI

Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant

LNMolino@...

(Cell Phone)

(Office)

(Office Fax)

" A Texan with a Jersey Attitude "

" Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds

discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962)

The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and

the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or

organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless

I

specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only

for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential

materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public

domain by the original author.

In a message dated 1/11/2011 11:39:57 A.M. Central Standard Time,

amwoods8644@... writes:

Yes but I suspect that cops are shot at a little bit more and much more

frequently.

Alyssa Woods, NREMT-B

CPR Instructor

(210) 842-6428

> But have you been shot at or had a round hit your truck on a job?

>

> Louis N. Molino, Sr. CET

> FF/NREMT/FSI/EMSI

> Typed by my fingers on my iPhone.

> Please excuse any typos.

> (Cell)

> LNMolino@...

>

>

>

> > Hey, as I've told many a patient, " I'm not the po-lice. "

> >

> > Alyssa Woods, NREMT-B

> > CPR Instructor

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >> 240

> >>

> >> Louis N. Molino, Sr. CET

> >> FF/NREMT/FSI/EMSI

> >> Typed by my fingers on my iPhone.

> >> Please excuse any typos.

> >> (Cell)

> >> LNMolino@...

> >>

> >> On Jan 10, 2011, at 23:36, Alyssa Woods amwoods8644@...>

wrote:

> >>

> >>> Can I get one that says, " N00B " ? Or have I graduated to " Ricky

Rescue " ?

> >>>

> >>> Alyssa Woods, NREMT-B

> >>> CPR Instructor

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>> And can I get a guess as to the third level? Old #?*!

> >>>>

> >>>> Louis N. Molino, Sr. CET

> >>>> FF/NREMT/FSI/EMSI

> >>>> Typed by my fingers on my iPhone.

> >>>> Please excuse any typos.

> >>>> (Cell)

> >>>> LNMolino@...

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>> ,

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I am commissioning a pin, a patch, and a T-shirt for both " old

bird " and " old geezer. " You'll get both!

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Gene

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an

MCI.

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed

and

> >>>>>> available

> >>>>>>>> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single

shooting

> >>>>>> victim then

> >>>>>>>> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind

ground

> >>>>>> ambulance

> >>>>>>>> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely

had

> >>>>>> many

> >>>>>>>> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep

> >>>>>> everyone there

> >>>>>>>> for witness statements, etc.

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way

> >>>>>> to control

> >>>>>>>> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> --- In texasems-l

> >>>>>> ;

> >>>>>> ;; ,

> >>>>>>>> wegandy1938@... wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>> Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North

> >>>>>> Oracle, the

> >>>>>>>> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center

where

> >>>>>> she was

> >>>>>>>> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and

two

> >>>>>> right

> >>>>>>>> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed

> >>>>>> all traffic

> >>>>>>>> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights,

each

> >>>>>> timed to

> >>>>>>>> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have

expected

> >>>>>> at 1100

> >>>>>>>> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had

been

> >>>>>>>> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all

green

> >>>>>> lights,

> >>>>>>>> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can

> >>>>>> be on scene

> >>>>>>>> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>> The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only

> >>>>>> shocking for its

> >>>>>>>> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes.

What

> >>>>>> can these

> >>>>>>>> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control

system

> >>>>>> and which

> >>>>>>>> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County,

be

> >>>>>> thinking?

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>> I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>> GG

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>> =

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> --

> >>>>> Grayson

> >>>>> www.kellygrayson.com

> >>>>>

> >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >>>>>

> >>>>> ------------------------------------

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:39, " Alyssa Woods " amwoods8644@...> said:

> Yes but I suspect that cops are shot at a little bit more and much more

> frequently.

That's another EMS myth. I have never once been shot at as a police officer.

But I long ago lost track of the number of times I had been shot at as a medic

or fireman.

Of course, they all pale in comparison to Iraq in 06.

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:39, " Alyssa Woods " amwoods8644@...> said:

> Yes but I suspect that cops are shot at a little bit more and much more

> frequently.

That's another EMS myth. I have never once been shot at as a police officer.

But I long ago lost track of the number of times I had been shot at as a medic

or fireman.

Of course, they all pale in comparison to Iraq in 06.

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to _http://www.odmp.org _ (http://www.odmp.org ) there were 59

LEO's killed by gunfire and another 2 by accidental gunfire in 2010 and as

of 5 minutes ago 2 LEO's killed by gunfire in 2011.

So much for myth huh?

Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET

FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI

Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant

LNMolino@...

(Cell Phone)

(Office)

(Office Fax)

" A Texan with a Jersey Attitude "

" Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds

discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962)

The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and

the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or

organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless

I

specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only

for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential

materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public

domain by the original author.

In a message dated 1/11/2011 4:58:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,

rob.davis@... writes:

On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:39, " Alyssa Woods " amwoods8644@...>

said:

> Yes but I suspect that cops are shot at a little bit more and much more

> frequently.

That's another EMS myth. I have never once been shot at as a police

officer. But I long ago lost track of the number of times I had been shot at

as

a medic or fireman.

Of course, they all pale in comparison to Iraq in 06.

Rob

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to _http://www.odmp.org _ (http://www.odmp.org ) there were 59

LEO's killed by gunfire and another 2 by accidental gunfire in 2010 and as

of 5 minutes ago 2 LEO's killed by gunfire in 2011.

So much for myth huh?

Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET

FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI

Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant

LNMolino@...

(Cell Phone)

(Office)

(Office Fax)

" A Texan with a Jersey Attitude "

" Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds

discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962)

The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and

the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or

organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless

I

specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only

for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential

materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public

domain by the original author.

In a message dated 1/11/2011 4:58:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,

rob.davis@... writes:

On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:39, " Alyssa Woods " amwoods8644@...>

said:

> Yes but I suspect that cops are shot at a little bit more and much more

> frequently.

That's another EMS myth. I have never once been shot at as a police

officer. But I long ago lost track of the number of times I had been shot at

as

a medic or fireman.

Of course, they all pale in comparison to Iraq in 06.

Rob

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

arrangements are made.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@... writes:

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: rick.moore@...

> To: texasems-l

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:50 pm

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Gene,

> All went to UMC first then were transferred to lower level centers?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: Wegandy

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 09:45 PM

> To: texasems-l texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Jodi,

>

> All went to UMC initially and then 5 were transported to St 's and

one to St. Jo.

>

> I don't know the triage order, but I do know that there were ample

ground trucks available and NO reason for 3 helos to be lined up in a row.

>

> The patients could have been taken by taxi and got there as soon.

>

> BTW, how are you doing? Keep me posted.

>

> Gene

>

> -----Original Message-----

> ;

> To: texasems-l ;

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:31 am

> Subject: RE: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I have been waiting for someone to bring this issue up. I would also be

> curious to investigate the order of Triage for all the patients both on

> scene and at UMC. I also understand some patients went to Northwest? Or

> other hospitals?

>

> Jodi

>

> From: texasems-l ;

[mailto:texasems-l ;] On

> Behalf Of Doc P

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:14 AM

> To: texasems-l ;

> Subject: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

arrangements are made.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@... writes:

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: rick.moore@...

> To: texasems-l

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:50 pm

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Gene,

> All went to UMC first then were transferred to lower level centers?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: Wegandy

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 09:45 PM

> To: texasems-l texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Jodi,

>

> All went to UMC initially and then 5 were transported to St 's and

one to St. Jo.

>

> I don't know the triage order, but I do know that there were ample

ground trucks available and NO reason for 3 helos to be lined up in a row.

>

> The patients could have been taken by taxi and got there as soon.

>

> BTW, how are you doing? Keep me posted.

>

> Gene

>

> -----Original Message-----

> ;

> To: texasems-l ;

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:31 am

> Subject: RE: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I have been waiting for someone to bring this issue up. I would also be

> curious to investigate the order of Triage for all the patients both on

> scene and at UMC. I also understand some patients went to Northwest? Or

> other hospitals?

>

> Jodi

>

> From: texasems-l ;

[mailto:texasems-l ;] On

> Behalf Of Doc P

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:14 AM

> To: texasems-l ;

> Subject: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

arrangements are made.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@... writes:

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: rick.moore@...

> To: texasems-l

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:50 pm

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Gene,

> All went to UMC first then were transferred to lower level centers?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: Wegandy

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 09:45 PM

> To: texasems-l texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Jodi,

>

> All went to UMC initially and then 5 were transported to St 's and

one to St. Jo.

>

> I don't know the triage order, but I do know that there were ample

ground trucks available and NO reason for 3 helos to be lined up in a row.

>

> The patients could have been taken by taxi and got there as soon.

>

> BTW, how are you doing? Keep me posted.

>

> Gene

>

> -----Original Message-----

> ;

> To: texasems-l ;

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:31 am

> Subject: RE: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I have been waiting for someone to bring this issue up. I would also be

> curious to investigate the order of Triage for all the patients both on

> scene and at UMC. I also understand some patients went to Northwest? Or

> other hospitals?

>

> Jodi

>

> From: texasems-l ;

[mailto:texasems-l ;] On

> Behalf Of Doc P

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:14 AM

> To: texasems-l ;

> Subject: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the usual...the distrust of most physicians of most paramedics and other

field personnel.

Docs who are prior service or who have come up through the ranks generally

trust the triage methods available to medics...many other physicians, who

have never had consistent contact with the medics, are less able to believe

that 'non physicians' can handle the problems. Myopia on the part of those

physicians as much as anything else.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 20:06:00 Central Standard Time, rick.moor

e@... writes:

But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene

triage could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

Rick

Sent via Blackberry

From: krin135@...

Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

To: texasems-l texasems-l >

Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

arrangements are made.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@...

writes:

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: rick.moore@...

> To: texasems-l

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:50 pm

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Gene,

> All went to UMC first then were transferred to lower level centers?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: Wegandy

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 09:45 PM

> To: texasems-l

texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Jodi,

>

> All went to UMC initially and then 5 were transported to St 's and

one to St. Jo.

>

> I don't know the triage order, but I do know that there were ample

ground trucks available and NO reason for 3 helos to be lined up in a row.

>

> The patients could have been taken by taxi and got there as soon.

>

> BTW, how are you doing? Keep me posted.

>

> Gene

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: JMeere

jmeere@...>;

> To:

texasems-l

;

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:31 am

> Subject: RE: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I have been waiting for someone to bring this issue up. I would also be

> curious to investigate the order of Triage for all the patients both on

> scene and at UMC. I also understand some patients went to Northwest? Or

> other hospitals?

>

> Jodi

>

> From:

texasems-l

;

[mailto:texasems-l

;] On

> Behalf Of Doc P

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:14 AM

> To:

texasems-l

;

> Subject: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the usual...the distrust of most physicians of most paramedics and other

field personnel.

Docs who are prior service or who have come up through the ranks generally

trust the triage methods available to medics...many other physicians, who

have never had consistent contact with the medics, are less able to believe

that 'non physicians' can handle the problems. Myopia on the part of those

physicians as much as anything else.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 20:06:00 Central Standard Time, rick.moor

e@... writes:

But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene

triage could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

Rick

Sent via Blackberry

From: krin135@...

Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

To: texasems-l texasems-l >

Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

arrangements are made.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@...

writes:

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: rick.moore@...

> To: texasems-l

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:50 pm

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Gene,

> All went to UMC first then were transferred to lower level centers?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: Wegandy

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 09:45 PM

> To: texasems-l

texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Jodi,

>

> All went to UMC initially and then 5 were transported to St 's and

one to St. Jo.

>

> I don't know the triage order, but I do know that there were ample

ground trucks available and NO reason for 3 helos to be lined up in a row.

>

> The patients could have been taken by taxi and got there as soon.

>

> BTW, how are you doing? Keep me posted.

>

> Gene

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: JMeere

jmeere@...>;

> To:

texasems-l

;

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:31 am

> Subject: RE: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I have been waiting for someone to bring this issue up. I would also be

> curious to investigate the order of Triage for all the patients both on

> scene and at UMC. I also understand some patients went to Northwest? Or

> other hospitals?

>

> Jodi

>

> From:

texasems-l

;

[mailto:texasems-l

;] On

> Behalf Of Doc P

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:14 AM

> To:

texasems-l

;

> Subject: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the usual...the distrust of most physicians of most paramedics and other

field personnel.

Docs who are prior service or who have come up through the ranks generally

trust the triage methods available to medics...many other physicians, who

have never had consistent contact with the medics, are less able to believe

that 'non physicians' can handle the problems. Myopia on the part of those

physicians as much as anything else.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 20:06:00 Central Standard Time, rick.moor

e@... writes:

But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene

triage could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

Rick

Sent via Blackberry

From: krin135@...

Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

To: texasems-l texasems-l >

Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

arrangements are made.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@...

writes:

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: rick.moore@...

> To: texasems-l

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:50 pm

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Gene,

> All went to UMC first then were transferred to lower level centers?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: Wegandy

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 09:45 PM

> To: texasems-l

texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> Jodi,

>

> All went to UMC initially and then 5 were transported to St 's and

one to St. Jo.

>

> I don't know the triage order, but I do know that there were ample

ground trucks available and NO reason for 3 helos to be lined up in a row.

>

> The patients could have been taken by taxi and got there as soon.

>

> BTW, how are you doing? Keep me posted.

>

> Gene

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: JMeere

jmeere@...>;

> To:

texasems-l

;

> Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:31 am

> Subject: RE: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I have been waiting for someone to bring this issue up. I would also be

> curious to investigate the order of Triage for all the patients both on

> scene and at UMC. I also understand some patients went to Northwest? Or

> other hospitals?

>

> Jodi

>

> From:

texasems-l

;

[mailto:texasems-l

;] On

> Behalf Of Doc P

> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:14 AM

> To:

texasems-l

;

> Subject: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

probably a turf war that started while there was still two Level I centers

in the area....

I agree that proper field triage and sending the lesser cases further away

to lower (but still appropriate) levels of care will allow the closer, more

advanced centers to concentrate on the cases they can serve best.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 20:34:59 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@... writes:

Ignoring field triage, I don't understand why if the " protocol " is for the

" main " trauma center to receive all the patients to evaluate them, why the

transfer is necessary at all. It implies that for some reason (e.g.

staffing, rooms) that hospital is incapable of providing care to those patients

and needs to turf them off to the other hospitals. If you aren't able to

care for them over time, how are you able to care for them initially

(particularly when that is frequently the most intensive in needs of physician

and

nurses time)? And even if you can rotate people through the rooms fast

enough to keep things moving, how to do provide good care for the duration of

time it takes to organize the transfer (which I have never seen take less then

20 minutes after initial interventions are complete--though by no means is

my experience complete.)

Understanding trauma designations and capabilities of hospitals, while not

complicated, could trip people up, so it makes sense to send questionable

patients to a " better " facility then they might ultimately need. However,

at the very least I would think that you'd want to spread out the pain a bit

and send some of the obvious lesser traumas to alternate facilities.

Austin

> the usual...the distrust of most physicians of most paramedics and other

> field personnel.

>

> Docs who are prior service or who have come up through the ranks

generally

> trust the triage methods available to medics...many other physicians,

who

> have never had consistent contact with the medics, are less able to

believe

> that 'non physicians' can handle the problems. Myopia on the part of

those

> physicians as much as anything else.

>

> ck

>

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 20:06:00 Central Standard Time, rick.moor

> e@... writes:

>

> But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene

> triage could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: krin135@...

> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

> To: texasems-l texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and

transfer

> arrangements are made.

>

> ck

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

>

abaustin+yahoogroups@...

> writes:

>

> Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

>

>

>

> > Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

> >

> > GG

> >

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: rick.moore@...

> > To: texasems-l

> > Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:50 pm

> > Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

> >

> > Gene,

> > All went to UMC first then were transferred to lower level centers?

> > Rick

> > Sent via Blackberry

> >

> > From: Wegandy

> > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 09:45 PM

> > To: texasems-l

> texasems-l >

> > Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

> >

> > Jodi,

> >

> > All went to UMC initially and then 5 were transported to St 's and

> one to St. Jo.

> >

> > I don't know the triage order, but I do know that there were ample

> ground trucks available and NO reason for 3 helos to be lined up in a

row.

> >

> > The patients could have been taken by taxi and got there as soon.

> >

> > BTW, how are you doing? Keep me posted.

> >

> > Gene

> >

> > Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

> >

> > I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

> >

> > Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

> available

> > HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

> then

> > I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

> ambulance

> > ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> > people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

> there

> > for witness statements, etc.

> >

> > Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

> control

> > it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

> >

> >

> > >

> > > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> > scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

> was

> > taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two

right

> > turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

> traffic

> > laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each

timed

> to

> > 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

> 1100

> > this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> > operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

> lights,

> > cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

> scene

> > and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> > >

> > >

> > > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking

for

> its

> > stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

> these

> > people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

> which

> > dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

> thinking?

> > >

> > >

> > > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> > >

> > >

> > > GG

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

probably a turf war that started while there was still two Level I centers

in the area....

I agree that proper field triage and sending the lesser cases further away

to lower (but still appropriate) levels of care will allow the closer, more

advanced centers to concentrate on the cases they can serve best.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 20:34:59 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@... writes:

Ignoring field triage, I don't understand why if the " protocol " is for the

" main " trauma center to receive all the patients to evaluate them, why the

transfer is necessary at all. It implies that for some reason (e.g.

staffing, rooms) that hospital is incapable of providing care to those patients

and needs to turf them off to the other hospitals. If you aren't able to

care for them over time, how are you able to care for them initially

(particularly when that is frequently the most intensive in needs of physician

and

nurses time)? And even if you can rotate people through the rooms fast

enough to keep things moving, how to do provide good care for the duration of

time it takes to organize the transfer (which I have never seen take less then

20 minutes after initial interventions are complete--though by no means is

my experience complete.)

Understanding trauma designations and capabilities of hospitals, while not

complicated, could trip people up, so it makes sense to send questionable

patients to a " better " facility then they might ultimately need. However,

at the very least I would think that you'd want to spread out the pain a bit

and send some of the obvious lesser traumas to alternate facilities.

Austin

> the usual...the distrust of most physicians of most paramedics and other

> field personnel.

>

> Docs who are prior service or who have come up through the ranks

generally

> trust the triage methods available to medics...many other physicians,

who

> have never had consistent contact with the medics, are less able to

believe

> that 'non physicians' can handle the problems. Myopia on the part of

those

> physicians as much as anything else.

>

> ck

>

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 20:06:00 Central Standard Time, rick.moor

> e@... writes:

>

> But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene

> triage could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: krin135@...

> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

> To: texasems-l texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and

transfer

> arrangements are made.

>

> ck

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

>

abaustin+yahoogroups@...

> writes:

>

> Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

>

>

>

> > Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

> >

> > GG

> >

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: rick.moore@...

> > To: texasems-l

> > Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 8:50 pm

> > Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

> >

> > Gene,

> > All went to UMC first then were transferred to lower level centers?

> > Rick

> > Sent via Blackberry

> >

> > From: Wegandy

> > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 09:45 PM

> > To: texasems-l

> texasems-l >

> > Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

> >

> > Jodi,

> >

> > All went to UMC initially and then 5 were transported to St 's and

> one to St. Jo.

> >

> > I don't know the triage order, but I do know that there were ample

> ground trucks available and NO reason for 3 helos to be lined up in a

row.

> >

> > The patients could have been taken by taxi and got there as soon.

> >

> > BTW, how are you doing? Keep me posted.

> >

> > Gene

> >

> > Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

> >

> > I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

> >

> > Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

> available

> > HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

> then

> > I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

> ambulance

> > ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> > people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

> there

> > for witness statements, etc.

> >

> > Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

> control

> > it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

> >

> >

> > >

> > > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> > scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

> was

> > taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two

right

> > turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

> traffic

> > laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each

timed

> to

> > 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

> 1100

> > this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> > operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

> lights,

> > cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

> scene

> > and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> > >

> > >

> > > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking

for

> its

> > stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

> these

> > people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

> which

> > dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

> thinking?

> > >

> > >

> > > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> > >

> > >

> > > GG

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at 1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at 1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene triage

could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

Rick

Sent via Blackberry

From: krin135@...

Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

To: texasems-l texasems-l >

Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

arrangements are made.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@...

writes:

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene triage

could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

Rick

Sent via Blackberry

From: krin135@...

Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

To: texasems-l texasems-l >

Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

arrangements are made.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@...

writes:

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene triage

could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

Rick

Sent via Blackberry

From: krin135@...

Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

To: texasems-l texasems-l >

Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

arrangements are made.

ck

In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

abaustin+yahoogroups@...

writes:

Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>

> GG

>

> Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ignoring field triage, I don't understand why if the " protocol " is for the

" main " trauma center to receive all the patients to evaluate them, why the

transfer is necessary at all. It implies that for some reason (e.g. staffing,

rooms) that hospital is incapable of providing care to those patients and needs

to turf them off to the other hospitals. If you aren't able to care for them

over time, how are you able to care for them initially (particularly when that

is frequently the most intensive in needs of physician and nurses time)? And

even if you can rotate people through the rooms fast enough to keep things

moving, how to do provide good care for the duration of time it takes to

organize the transfer (which I have never seen take less then 20 minutes after

initial interventions are complete--though by no means is my experience

complete.)

Understanding trauma designations and capabilities of hospitals, while not

complicated, could trip people up, so it makes sense to send questionable

patients to a " better " facility then they might ultimately need. However, at the

very least I would think that you'd want to spread out the pain a bit and send

some of the obvious lesser traumas to alternate facilities.

Austin

> the usual...the distrust of most physicians of most paramedics and other

> field personnel.

>

> Docs who are prior service or who have come up through the ranks generally

> trust the triage methods available to medics...many other physicians, who

> have never had consistent contact with the medics, are less able to believe

> that 'non physicians' can handle the problems. Myopia on the part of those

> physicians as much as anything else.

>

> ck

>

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 20:06:00 Central Standard Time, rick.moor

> e@... writes:

>

> But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene

> triage could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: krin135@...

> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

> To: texasems-l texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

> arrangements are made.

>

> ck

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

> abaustin+yahoogroups@...

> writes:

>

> Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

>

>

>

> > Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

> >

> > GG

> >

> > Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

> >

> > I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

> >

> > Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

> available

> > HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

> then

> > I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

> ambulance

> > ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> > people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

> there

> > for witness statements, etc.

> >

> > Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

> control

> > it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

> >

> >

> > >

> > > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> > scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

> was

> > taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> > turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

> traffic

> > laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

> to

> > 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

> 1100

> > this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> > operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

> lights,

> > cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

> scene

> > and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> > >

> > >

> > > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

> its

> > stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

> these

> > people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

> which

> > dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

> thinking?

> > >

> > >

> > > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> > >

> > >

> > > GG

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ignoring field triage, I don't understand why if the " protocol " is for the

" main " trauma center to receive all the patients to evaluate them, why the

transfer is necessary at all. It implies that for some reason (e.g. staffing,

rooms) that hospital is incapable of providing care to those patients and needs

to turf them off to the other hospitals. If you aren't able to care for them

over time, how are you able to care for them initially (particularly when that

is frequently the most intensive in needs of physician and nurses time)? And

even if you can rotate people through the rooms fast enough to keep things

moving, how to do provide good care for the duration of time it takes to

organize the transfer (which I have never seen take less then 20 minutes after

initial interventions are complete--though by no means is my experience

complete.)

Understanding trauma designations and capabilities of hospitals, while not

complicated, could trip people up, so it makes sense to send questionable

patients to a " better " facility then they might ultimately need. However, at the

very least I would think that you'd want to spread out the pain a bit and send

some of the obvious lesser traumas to alternate facilities.

Austin

> the usual...the distrust of most physicians of most paramedics and other

> field personnel.

>

> Docs who are prior service or who have come up through the ranks generally

> trust the triage methods available to medics...many other physicians, who

> have never had consistent contact with the medics, are less able to believe

> that 'non physicians' can handle the problems. Myopia on the part of those

> physicians as much as anything else.

>

> ck

>

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 20:06:00 Central Standard Time, rick.moor

> e@... writes:

>

> But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene

> triage could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: krin135@...

> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

> To: texasems-l texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

> arrangements are made.

>

> ck

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

> abaustin+yahoogroups@...

> writes:

>

> Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

>

>

>

> > Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

> >

> > GG

> >

> > Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

> >

> > I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

> >

> > Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

> available

> > HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

> then

> > I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

> ambulance

> > ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> > people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

> there

> > for witness statements, etc.

> >

> > Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

> control

> > it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

> >

> >

> > >

> > > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> > scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

> was

> > taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> > turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

> traffic

> > laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

> to

> > 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

> 1100

> > this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> > operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

> lights,

> > cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

> scene

> > and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> > >

> > >

> > > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

> its

> > stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

> these

> > people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

> which

> > dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

> thinking?

> > >

> > >

> > > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> > >

> > >

> > > GG

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Territory protection. We had similar problems in NJ when trauma centers first

started.

Louis N. Molino, Sr. CET

FF/NREMT/FSI/EMSI

Typed by my fingers on my iPhone.

Please excuse any typos.

(Cell)

LNMolino@...

> But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene triage

could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: krin135@...

> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

> To: texasems-l texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

>

>

> not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

> arrangements are made.

>

> ck

>

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

> abaustin+yahoogroups@...

writes:

>

> Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

>

>

>

>> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>>

>> GG

>>

>> Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>>

>> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>>

>> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

> available

>> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

> then

>> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

> ambulance

>> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

>> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

> there

>> for witness statements, etc.

>>

>> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

> control

>> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>>

>>

>>>

>>> Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

>> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

> was

>> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

>> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

> traffic

>> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

> to

>> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

> 1100

>> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

>> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

> lights,

>> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

> scene

>> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

>>>

>>>

>>> The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

> its

>> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

> these

>> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

> which

>> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

> thinking?

>>>

>>>

>>> I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

>>>

>>>

>>> GG

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Territory protection. We had similar problems in NJ when trauma centers first

started.

Louis N. Molino, Sr. CET

FF/NREMT/FSI/EMSI

Typed by my fingers on my iPhone.

Please excuse any typos.

(Cell)

LNMolino@...

> But why create the need to evaluate and transfer when a little scene triage

could send the patients to an appropriate facility to begin with?

> Rick

> Sent via Blackberry

>

> From: krin135@...

> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:00 PM

> To: texasems-l texasems-l >

> Subject: Re: Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

>

>

> not as long as there is an appropriate screening examination, and transfer

> arrangements are made.

>

> ck

>

>

> In a message dated 01/12/11 19:58:38 Central Standard Time,

> abaustin+yahoogroups@...

writes:

>

> Isn't that an EMTALA problem?

>

>

>

>> Yes. According to the ER supervisor. That's the protocol here.

>>

>> GG

>>

>> Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>>

>> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>>

>> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

> available

>> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

> then

>> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

> ambulance

>> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

>> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

> there

>> for witness statements, etc.

>>

>> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

> control

>> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>>

>>

>>>

>>> Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

>> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

> was

>> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

>> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

> traffic

>> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

> to

>> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

> 1100

>> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

>> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

> lights,

>> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

> scene

>> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

>>>

>>>

>>> The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

> its

>> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

> these

>> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

> which

>> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

> thinking?

>>>

>>>

>>> I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

>>>

>>>

>>> GG

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because this is Southern Arizona. Logic plays no part.

GG

Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because this is Southern Arizona. Logic plays no part.

GG

Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because this is Southern Arizona. Logic plays no part.

GG

Re: Helicopter EMS Re-Validated?

>

> I might defend the use in this case due to the fact it was an MCI.

>

> Depending on unit availability, distance, etc; calling staffed and

available

> HEMS might not be unreasonable. If it was just a single shooting victim

then

> I would agree with you, Gene. You should also keep in mind ground

ambulance

> ingress/egress issues on this particular call. You very likely had many

> people trying to leave the parking lot, police trying to keep everyone

there

> for witness statements, etc.

>

> Overall, HEMS is an overused resource. I don't know the best way to

control

> it. I don't think this is an obvious example though.

>

>

> >

> > Earlier tonight I drove the route from West Ina and North Oracle, the

> scene of the Giffords shooting, to University Medical Center where she

was

> taken. The distance is 8.7 miles. There are two left turns and two right

> turns between the scene and the ambulance dock at UMC. I obeyed all

traffic

> laws, drove exactly the speed limit, and caught 6 red lights, each timed

to

> 60 seconds. Traffic was moderate, about what I would have expected at

1100

> this morning in that area. My elapsed time was 16:07. If I had been

> operating Code 3, the Opticom system would have given me all green

lights,

> cutting at least 6 minutes off the trip. Tell me that a helo can be on

scene

> and back at the hospital ready to unload in 10 minutes.

> >

> >

> > The insane misuse of helicopter EMS in Tucson is not only shocking for

its

> stupidity but cannot possibly contribute to patient outcomes. What can

these

> people (the people who run Tucson Meds, the medical control system and

which

> dispatches all helicopters and all ambulances in Pima County, be

thinking?

> >

> >

> > I intend to find out. Stay tuned.

> >

> >

> > GG

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...