Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 > I need some help locating studies discussing ligament damage > resulting from a quick force on muscles - I'll ask Mike when I speak to him next. He's at grandma's house, so I should be able to track him down tomorrow. I would call today, but I am at work and school until 9 pm, and grandma will be asleep by the time I get home to look up her phone #. -Barb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 > I've also read somewhere that even passive stretching is bad since it > can overstretch the ligaments. Hi , How awful for you! It sure makes me thankful I didn't go back to the chiro after the 1st visit. I think I have something at home about the passive stretching...as for the other, I'm not sure I have anything regarding that. I will look this evening, unless you receive a reply before then. I hope you get to feeling better!!! Love Lana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 Thanks Barb, I appreciate it. I've been searching the net, but in my foggy brain way today - I'm not having much luck finding what I'm looking for. MIchelle > > I need some help locating studies discussing ligament damage > > resulting from a quick force on muscles - > > I'll ask Mike when I speak to him next. He's at grandma's house, so I > should be able to track him down tomorrow. I would call today, but I am at > work and school until 9 pm, and grandma will be asleep by the time I get > home to look up her phone #. > > -Barb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 Thanks Lana, I appreciate the support. One of the more frustrating parts is that in the past this chiro has been wonderful. I feel a bit betrayed. She has alway used non force techniques like cranial sacral - acupressure, and a couple other things that are non force. I've had wonderful results working with her. Recently she got into a new technique and is changing her practice to revolve around it. Makes me think of the joke - a man with a hammer thinks everything is a nail - I'm begining to think she's gotten a new hammer and is now trying to make us all become nails. I thought that she would continue to treat us like she always had - but it appears that isn't the situation. I will still stick up for chiros who use non force techniques - and give them a lot of credit for my body holding together as well as it has. I look at this experience as a reminder that I'm responsible for my own body! > > > I've also read somewhere that even passive stretching is bad since > it > > can overstretch the ligaments. > > > Hi , > > How awful for you! It sure makes me thankful I didn't go back to the > chiro after the 1st visit. I think I have something at home about > the passive stretching...as for the other, I'm not sure I have > anything regarding that. I will look this evening, unless you > receive a reply before then. > > I hope you get to feeling better!!! > > Love Lana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 , I located this under the files section. The name of the article is Hypermobility Syndrome. This is what I was looking for regarding the stretching. Does this help?? " Exercise Although exercise will not increase stiffness of the lax ligaments seen in patients with HMS, strengthening and proprioceptive exercises are recommended for muscula-ture surrounding affected joints.2,3,9,35,80 –83 Individuals with HMS and fibromyalgia who exercised reported greater improvement in symptoms than did those who did not exercise.68 Indiscriminant exercise, however, could be harmful. For example, lightweight women rowers who had excessive spinal mobility were more likely to have back problems if they participated in a stretching program for their backs.84 It appears reason-able, therefore, to advise individuals with HMS to use stretching exercises cautiously, distinguishing between stretching muscles and stretching joints, as the former may be beneficial but the latter may be harmful. Although many authors recommend exercise for these patients, few have any data on which to base that recommendation. Moderate and low-impact strengthening exercises, cardiovascular exercise for weight control, and stretching of muscles rather than joints seem theoretically sound recommendations, but the assumptions on which these recommendations are based must be tested. Given the predisposition of patients with HMS for cumulative trauma injuries, studies are needed to determine how much exercise is appropriate for these individuals. The use of orthotic devices, braces, and taping for patients with HMS also warrants further research. " Love Lana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 , Here is another article, also regarding stretching, AND from a chiropractic site: http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/18/14/11.html Hypermobility Syndrome by Warren Hammer,MS,DC,DABCO Have you ever had a patient complain of recurring pain in numerous joints, or respraining of a particular (wrist) joint, who may or may not express an inflammatory picture, and has been to many other doctors without a definite diagnosis or helpful treatment? This patient may be suffering with a hypermobility syndrome (HMS). Because other conditions may express joint hypermobility, and can be excluded by laboratory testing, HMS becomes a diagnosis of exclusion. Two conditions that definitely have joint hypermobility and are connective tissue disorders are Ehlers-Danlos and Marfan syndrome. These two conditions exhibit hyperelastic skin, hernias, lenticular abnormalities and abnormal body proportions. 1 Other conditions exhibiting hypermobile joints are rheumatoid arthritis, osteogenesis imperfecta, systemic lupus erythematosus, poliomyelitis, myotonia congenita, and some neurological conditions. HMS patients have a gender-influenced dominant trait with an abnormality of type I collagen. The condition is more common in females. Type I collagen is the most common collagen and is contained in tendons, ligaments, joint capsules, skin, demineralized bone and nerve receptors.1 Hypermobility of joints and spine is due to abnormal laxity of ligaments, joint capsules and intervertebreal discs. Back patients with symptoms who do not develop osteoarthrosis or disc degeneration usually experience spontaneous improvement with increasing age, thus losing their juvenile hyperlaxity. This usually occurs between 30 and 40 years of age. In HMS patients, too much activity causes pain. Hypermobility per se is a state, not a disease, but it may lead to generalized arthralgia or localized symptoms (frequent ankle sprains, knee effusions, dislocations of the shoulders and recurrent episodes of back pain). Pain can occur even after minor strains, especially in young women.2 HMS patients, besides having hypermobile joints, have decreased joint position sense, making them more vulnerable to minor damage. Reduced sensory feedback may lead to biomechanically unsound limb positions being adopted. This mechanism may allow acceleration of degenerative joint conditions, and may account for the increased prevalence of such conditions seen with HMS subjects.3 HMS patients have more osteoarthritis; increased nerve compression disorders;4 chondromalacia patellae; excessive anterior mandibular movement;5 mitral valve prolapse;6 uterine prolapse; and varicose veins.2 Larsson7 et al., state that patients with HMS who have a sedentary job have increased spinal pain. Criteria for the diagnosis of HMS are: 1. passive thumb apposition to touch the forearm; 2. passive little finger hyperextension of more than 90 degrees; 3. elbow hyperextension of more than 10 degrees; 4. knee hyperextension of more than10 degrees; 5. forward flexion of the trunk with the knees straight and the palms of the hands resting flat on the floor. HMS is usually diagnosed in individuals who can perform three or more of these tests.8 Some clinicians include excessive ankle dorsiflexion and foot eversion in the criteria for HMS. Patients with HMS may complain of symptoms from ages 3 to 70, which usually affect multiple joints over the years. " They typically lack the positive laboratory findings found in rheumatologic disorders and, in the absence of acute trauma, lack the radiologic changes, inflammation, swelling and decreased mobility typical of orthopedic pathology. " 1 Unless they have specifically stressed a particular joint and created an inflammation, HMS patients do not respond to anti-inflammatory medication. HMS patients must be educated about their body mechanics, posture and activities. Activities may have to be modified. Even splints, braces and taping may have to be used to protect vulnerable joints. 1 Movement of the joints in the end-ranges should be discouraged. Stretching muscles rather than joints should be emphasized. Guided progressive strengthening exercises and balance boards for proprioceptive stimulation are recommended. References: 1. Russek LN. Hypermobility syndrome. Phys Ther 79(6), 1999. 2. Nef W, Gerber NJ. Hypermobility syndrome. When too much activity causes pain. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 128(8),1998:302-10. 3. Hall MG, Ferrell WR, Sturrock RD, hamblen DL, Baxendale RH. The effect of the hypermobility syndrome on knee joint proprioception. Br J Rheumatol 34(2), 1995:121-5. 4. El-Shahaly HJA, El-Sherif AK. Is the benign joint hypermobility syndrome benign? Clin Rheumatol. 10(19), 91:302-307. 5. Buckigham RB, Braun T, Harinstein DA, et al. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome: a close association with systemic joint laxity (the hypermobile joint syndrome). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72,1991:514-519. 6. Grahame R, JC, Pitcher D, et al. A clinical and echocardiographic study of patients with the hypermobility syndrome. Ann Rhem Dis 40,1981:5 41-546. 7. Larsson LG, Mudholkar GS, Baum J, Srivastava DK. Benefits and liabilities of hypermobility in the back pain disorders of industrial workers. J Intern Med. 238, 1995:461-67. 8. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskoine CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 32, 1973:413-418. Warren Hammer,MS,DC,DABCO Norwalk, Connecticut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 Aopther article http://www.chiro.org/cases/ABSTRACTS/Ehlers-Danlos.html Chiropractic Management of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Report of Two Cases This section is maintained by M. Painter, D.C. Send all comments or additions to: p@... FROM: J Manip Physiol Ther 2003 (Sep); 26 (7): 448–459 ~ FULL TEXT AUTHORS: 1 J. Colloca, DC 2 Bradley S. Polkinghorn, DC OBJECTIVE: To discuss 2 patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome seeking chiropractic evaluation and management of their disabling musculoskeletal pain and associated disorders. CLINICAL FEATURES: Two disabled patients diagnosed with Ehlers- Danlos syndrome had spinal pain, including neck and back pain, headache, and extremity pain. Commonalities among these 2 cases included abnormal spinal curvatures (kyphosis and scoliosis), joint hypermobility, and tissue fragility. One patient had postsurgical thoracolumbar spinal fusion (T11-sacrum) for scoliosis and osteoporosis. The other patient had moderate anterior head translation. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Both patients were treated with mechanical force and manually assisted spinal adjustments delivered to various spinal segments and extremities utilizing an Activator II Adjusting Instrument and Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique. Patients were also given postural advice, stabilization exercises, and postural corrective exercises, as indicated in Chiropractic BioPhysics Technique protocols. Both patients were able to reduce pain and anti-inflammatory medication usage in association with chiropractic care. Significant improvement in self-reported pain and disability as measured by visual analog score, Oswestry Low-Back Disability Index, and Neck Pain Disability Index were reported, and objective improvements in physical examination and spinal alignment were also observed following chiropractic care. Despite these improvements, work disability status remained unchanged in both patients. CONCLUSION: Chiropractic care may be of benefit to some patients with connective tissue disorders, including Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Low-force chiropractic adjusting techniques may be a preferred technique of choice in patients with tissue fragility, offering clinicians a viable alternative to traditional chiropractic care in attempting to minimize risks and/or side effects associated with spinal manipulation. Psychosocial issues, including patient desire to return to work, were important factors in work disability status and perceived outcome. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- 1 Clinic Director, State of the Art Chiropractic Center, PC, Phoenix, Ariz, and Faculty, Postgraduate and Continuing Education Department, New York Chiropractic College, Seneca Falls, NY, USA 2 Private practice of chiropractic, Santa , Calif, USA This research was supported, in part, by Chiropractic Biophysics Non- profit, Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 Aopther article http://www.chiro.org/cases/ABSTRACTS/Ehlers-Danlos.html Chiropractic Management of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Report of Two Cases This section is maintained by M. Painter, D.C. Send all comments or additions to: p@... FROM: J Manip Physiol Ther 2003 (Sep); 26 (7): 448–459 ~ FULL TEXT AUTHORS: 1 J. Colloca, DC 2 Bradley S. Polkinghorn, DC OBJECTIVE: To discuss 2 patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome seeking chiropractic evaluation and management of their disabling musculoskeletal pain and associated disorders. CLINICAL FEATURES: Two disabled patients diagnosed with Ehlers- Danlos syndrome had spinal pain, including neck and back pain, headache, and extremity pain. Commonalities among these 2 cases included abnormal spinal curvatures (kyphosis and scoliosis), joint hypermobility, and tissue fragility. One patient had postsurgical thoracolumbar spinal fusion (T11-sacrum) for scoliosis and osteoporosis. The other patient had moderate anterior head translation. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Both patients were treated with mechanical force and manually assisted spinal adjustments delivered to various spinal segments and extremities utilizing an Activator II Adjusting Instrument and Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique. Patients were also given postural advice, stabilization exercises, and postural corrective exercises, as indicated in Chiropractic BioPhysics Technique protocols. Both patients were able to reduce pain and anti-inflammatory medication usage in association with chiropractic care. Significant improvement in self-reported pain and disability as measured by visual analog score, Oswestry Low-Back Disability Index, and Neck Pain Disability Index were reported, and objective improvements in physical examination and spinal alignment were also observed following chiropractic care. Despite these improvements, work disability status remained unchanged in both patients. CONCLUSION: Chiropractic care may be of benefit to some patients with connective tissue disorders, including Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Low-force chiropractic adjusting techniques may be a preferred technique of choice in patients with tissue fragility, offering clinicians a viable alternative to traditional chiropractic care in attempting to minimize risks and/or side effects associated with spinal manipulation. Psychosocial issues, including patient desire to return to work, were important factors in work disability status and perceived outcome. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- 1 Clinic Director, State of the Art Chiropractic Center, PC, Phoenix, Ariz, and Faculty, Postgraduate and Continuing Education Department, New York Chiropractic College, Seneca Falls, NY, USA 2 Private practice of chiropractic, Santa , Calif, USA This research was supported, in part, by Chiropractic Biophysics Non- profit, Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 Aopther article http://www.chiro.org/cases/ABSTRACTS/Ehlers-Danlos.html Chiropractic Management of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Report of Two Cases This section is maintained by M. Painter, D.C. Send all comments or additions to: p@... FROM: J Manip Physiol Ther 2003 (Sep); 26 (7): 448–459 ~ FULL TEXT AUTHORS: 1 J. Colloca, DC 2 Bradley S. Polkinghorn, DC OBJECTIVE: To discuss 2 patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome seeking chiropractic evaluation and management of their disabling musculoskeletal pain and associated disorders. CLINICAL FEATURES: Two disabled patients diagnosed with Ehlers- Danlos syndrome had spinal pain, including neck and back pain, headache, and extremity pain. Commonalities among these 2 cases included abnormal spinal curvatures (kyphosis and scoliosis), joint hypermobility, and tissue fragility. One patient had postsurgical thoracolumbar spinal fusion (T11-sacrum) for scoliosis and osteoporosis. The other patient had moderate anterior head translation. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Both patients were treated with mechanical force and manually assisted spinal adjustments delivered to various spinal segments and extremities utilizing an Activator II Adjusting Instrument and Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique. Patients were also given postural advice, stabilization exercises, and postural corrective exercises, as indicated in Chiropractic BioPhysics Technique protocols. Both patients were able to reduce pain and anti-inflammatory medication usage in association with chiropractic care. Significant improvement in self-reported pain and disability as measured by visual analog score, Oswestry Low-Back Disability Index, and Neck Pain Disability Index were reported, and objective improvements in physical examination and spinal alignment were also observed following chiropractic care. Despite these improvements, work disability status remained unchanged in both patients. CONCLUSION: Chiropractic care may be of benefit to some patients with connective tissue disorders, including Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Low-force chiropractic adjusting techniques may be a preferred technique of choice in patients with tissue fragility, offering clinicians a viable alternative to traditional chiropractic care in attempting to minimize risks and/or side effects associated with spinal manipulation. Psychosocial issues, including patient desire to return to work, were important factors in work disability status and perceived outcome. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- 1 Clinic Director, State of the Art Chiropractic Center, PC, Phoenix, Ariz, and Faculty, Postgraduate and Continuing Education Department, New York Chiropractic College, Seneca Falls, NY, USA 2 Private practice of chiropractic, Santa , Calif, USA This research was supported, in part, by Chiropractic Biophysics Non- profit, Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 http://www.ednf.org/chronicpain.html Chronic Pain is a Manifestation of the Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome Anubha Sacheti, Judy Szemere, Bruce Bernstein, Triantafyllos Tafas, Neil Schechter, Petros Tsipouras Non–pharmacologic approaches, such as physical therapy and exercise may be warranted but may also be quite traumatic and stressful for this group of patients. Physical therapy taking place in water (hydrotherapy), however, may be less damaging to joints and more enjoyable. Behavioral and cognitive coping techniques may also be extremely valuable. ...............also, read http://doctormansour.com/Chiropractic%20Risks.pdf What are the Risks of Chiropractic Neck Adjustments? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 http://www.ednf.org/chronicpain.html Chronic Pain is a Manifestation of the Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome Anubha Sacheti, Judy Szemere, Bruce Bernstein, Triantafyllos Tafas, Neil Schechter, Petros Tsipouras Non–pharmacologic approaches, such as physical therapy and exercise may be warranted but may also be quite traumatic and stressful for this group of patients. Physical therapy taking place in water (hydrotherapy), however, may be less damaging to joints and more enjoyable. Behavioral and cognitive coping techniques may also be extremely valuable. ...............also, read http://doctormansour.com/Chiropractic%20Risks.pdf What are the Risks of Chiropractic Neck Adjustments? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 http://www.ednf.org/chronicpain.html Chronic Pain is a Manifestation of the Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome Anubha Sacheti, Judy Szemere, Bruce Bernstein, Triantafyllos Tafas, Neil Schechter, Petros Tsipouras Non–pharmacologic approaches, such as physical therapy and exercise may be warranted but may also be quite traumatic and stressful for this group of patients. Physical therapy taking place in water (hydrotherapy), however, may be less damaging to joints and more enjoyable. Behavioral and cognitive coping techniques may also be extremely valuable. ...............also, read http://doctormansour.com/Chiropractic%20Risks.pdf What are the Risks of Chiropractic Neck Adjustments? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 > I need some help locating studies discussing ligament damage > resulting from a quick force on muscles - http://www.drblad.com/Can%20Chiropractic%20Help%20Me.htm Contraindications to Chiropractic Care Contraindications to chiropractic include fractures, bone tumors, bone and joint infections, and acute cauda equina syndrome (Redwood 1996). Those with acute myelopathy, advanced osteoporosis, cancer, congenital or acquired deformities, undiagnosed or progressive neurological deficits, and vertebral-basilar syndrome, should not receive chiropractic in the area of the problem (Hansen and Triano 2000). Patients with a history of hypertension and those receiving heparin therapy, should be monitored closely while receiving chiropractic treatments (Plaugher and Bachman 1993). Dislocations, acute rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, acute juvenile avascular necrosis, and unstable osodontoideum are also contraindications for chiropractic care (Redwood 1996). http://www.holisticonline.com/chiropractic/chiro_safety.htm Most of the concern around the safety of chiropractic treatment centers on manipulation of the neck. About 110 cases of complications allegedly due to chiropractic manipulation of the neck have been reported. Most of these were strokes. The connection has never been proven. In one large study involving 150,000 manipulations performed by 460 physicians showed no serious complications at all. According to the RAND Corporation, the overall rate of complications of chiropractic manipulation to the neck is approximately one in one million attesting to the safety of chiropractic treatment. The most common complication of chiropractic treatment is a temporary worsening of discomfort. PrecautionsManipulation of the spine, and especially of the cervical area, can be dangerous. If the neck is twisted too far, it is possible to tear the walls of the vulnerable vertebral arteries where they pass up to the neck. The result can be an aneurysm or blood clots, which, in turn, can cause a stroke or other neurological symptoms, such as vertigo and slurring, or even be fatal. There have been cases of neurological damage following chiropractic manipulations of the neck. In 1992, researchers at Stanford Stroke Center found that 55 people had been referred to neurologists in California following manipulation. They were suffering from permanent nerve damage, and one died. The vast majority of chiropractic manipulations are safe, but any manipulation carries a risk, so it is important that it is not undertaken lightly or unnecessarily. The spine should never be manipulated if there are any signs of a neurological involvement, such as a loss of sensation in the legs or impaired bladder control. Bone diseases, such as osteoporosis or cancer, a recent fracture, or serious circulatory problems, such as aneurysms or a history of thrombosis, are also contraindications for the use of spinal manipulations. If in doubt, consult your doctor. Chiropractic is not recommended for disorders of other than musculoskeletal origin, and should be avoided for certain musculoskeletal problems as well. For in- stance, it is not recommended for osteoporosis, bone or joint infections, bone cancer, acute rheumatoid arthritis, and diseases of the spinal chord or bone marrow. It should also be avoided in an area that has been operated on, such as a spinal fusion, and near acute fractures and dislocations or healed fractures and dislocations with signs of ligament damage. Chiropractors do not treat fractures. Scoliosis, a condition in which the spine curves to the side, is generally considered a target for chiropractic therapy. However, idiopathic scoliosis, which develops over time instead of being present at birth (congenital scoliosis), is not appropriate for treatment by a chiropractor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 > I need some help locating studies discussing ligament damage > resulting from a quick force on muscles - http://www.drblad.com/Can%20Chiropractic%20Help%20Me.htm Contraindications to Chiropractic Care Contraindications to chiropractic include fractures, bone tumors, bone and joint infections, and acute cauda equina syndrome (Redwood 1996). Those with acute myelopathy, advanced osteoporosis, cancer, congenital or acquired deformities, undiagnosed or progressive neurological deficits, and vertebral-basilar syndrome, should not receive chiropractic in the area of the problem (Hansen and Triano 2000). Patients with a history of hypertension and those receiving heparin therapy, should be monitored closely while receiving chiropractic treatments (Plaugher and Bachman 1993). Dislocations, acute rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, acute juvenile avascular necrosis, and unstable osodontoideum are also contraindications for chiropractic care (Redwood 1996). http://www.holisticonline.com/chiropractic/chiro_safety.htm Most of the concern around the safety of chiropractic treatment centers on manipulation of the neck. About 110 cases of complications allegedly due to chiropractic manipulation of the neck have been reported. Most of these were strokes. The connection has never been proven. In one large study involving 150,000 manipulations performed by 460 physicians showed no serious complications at all. According to the RAND Corporation, the overall rate of complications of chiropractic manipulation to the neck is approximately one in one million attesting to the safety of chiropractic treatment. The most common complication of chiropractic treatment is a temporary worsening of discomfort. PrecautionsManipulation of the spine, and especially of the cervical area, can be dangerous. If the neck is twisted too far, it is possible to tear the walls of the vulnerable vertebral arteries where they pass up to the neck. The result can be an aneurysm or blood clots, which, in turn, can cause a stroke or other neurological symptoms, such as vertigo and slurring, or even be fatal. There have been cases of neurological damage following chiropractic manipulations of the neck. In 1992, researchers at Stanford Stroke Center found that 55 people had been referred to neurologists in California following manipulation. They were suffering from permanent nerve damage, and one died. The vast majority of chiropractic manipulations are safe, but any manipulation carries a risk, so it is important that it is not undertaken lightly or unnecessarily. The spine should never be manipulated if there are any signs of a neurological involvement, such as a loss of sensation in the legs or impaired bladder control. Bone diseases, such as osteoporosis or cancer, a recent fracture, or serious circulatory problems, such as aneurysms or a history of thrombosis, are also contraindications for the use of spinal manipulations. If in doubt, consult your doctor. Chiropractic is not recommended for disorders of other than musculoskeletal origin, and should be avoided for certain musculoskeletal problems as well. For in- stance, it is not recommended for osteoporosis, bone or joint infections, bone cancer, acute rheumatoid arthritis, and diseases of the spinal chord or bone marrow. It should also be avoided in an area that has been operated on, such as a spinal fusion, and near acute fractures and dislocations or healed fractures and dislocations with signs of ligament damage. Chiropractors do not treat fractures. Scoliosis, a condition in which the spine curves to the side, is generally considered a target for chiropractic therapy. However, idiopathic scoliosis, which develops over time instead of being present at birth (congenital scoliosis), is not appropriate for treatment by a chiropractor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 Did you contact your chiro and tell her what has happened and what you are now suffering with due to her using a technique she should no better about using??? YOU REALLY NEED TO RING AND TELL HER IN PERSON as this is simply NOT ON. Sharon > > > > > I've also read somewhere that even passive stretching is bad > since > > it > > > can overstretch the ligaments. > > > > > > Hi , > > > > How awful for you! It sure makes me thankful I didn't go back to > the > > chiro after the 1st visit. I think I have something at home about > > the passive stretching...as for the other, I'm not sure I have > > anything regarding that. I will look this evening, unless you > > receive a reply before then. > > > > I hope you get to feeling better!!! > > > > Love Lana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 > Did you contact your chiro and tell her what has happened and what > you are now suffering with due to her using a technique she should no > better about using??? YOU REALLY NEED TO RING AND TELL HER IN PERSON > as this is simply NOT ON. > Sharon > > Well, on Monday when it happened I told her I wasn't pleased - described how awful I felt immediately and how it hurt when she did it. She just said that the adjustment needed to be done and the rest was because I wasn't responding to it well -duh! Told me just to go home and ice it because it had become swollen. Right now she is out of town - but you can be sure next time I see her I will give her all the details. I'm also assembling information to share with her - and will remind her of information from her class notes that she has let me read. Above all I will let her know that she is absolutely not to use any forceful techniques on either the girls or me again. Period! She really has been a good doctor, taught us a lot and provided a lot of relief and I hate to give that up - she gets one more chance. As for me -I'm feeling a lot better tonight. After chasing the pain around for a couple days today I stumbled on a spot in my mid back (lower part of Rhomboids) that responded to ice. The good part was I got plenty of practice with the polarity stuff. It was pretty amazing to feel the muscles relax and the pain move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2004 Report Share Posted May 13, 2004 > Did you contact your chiro and tell her what has happened and what > you are now suffering with due to her using a technique she should no > better about using??? YOU REALLY NEED TO RING AND TELL HER IN PERSON > as this is simply NOT ON. > Sharon > > Well, on Monday when it happened I told her I wasn't pleased - described how awful I felt immediately and how it hurt when she did it. She just said that the adjustment needed to be done and the rest was because I wasn't responding to it well -duh! Told me just to go home and ice it because it had become swollen. Right now she is out of town - but you can be sure next time I see her I will give her all the details. I'm also assembling information to share with her - and will remind her of information from her class notes that she has let me read. Above all I will let her know that she is absolutely not to use any forceful techniques on either the girls or me again. Period! She really has been a good doctor, taught us a lot and provided a lot of relief and I hate to give that up - she gets one more chance. As for me -I'm feeling a lot better tonight. After chasing the pain around for a couple days today I stumbled on a spot in my mid back (lower part of Rhomboids) that responded to ice. The good part was I got plenty of practice with the polarity stuff. It was pretty amazing to feel the muscles relax and the pain move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.