Guest guest Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 http://www.emsresponder.com/article/article.jsp?id=14128 http://www.emsresponder.com/article/article.jsp?id=14128&siteSection=1> &siteSection=1 Jim< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Only 1% of calls are for fire. That's an interesting stat. Are they going to rotate all firefighters onto the ambulance? Otherwise only a few will be working while the rest get to watch TV at the fire house. I am glad they see it is a waste to send so many people and so much equipment to most calls. This should save tax dollars if done right. Renny > > http://www.emsresponder.com/article/article.jsp?id=14128 > http://www.emsresponder.com/article/article.jsp?id=14128&siteSection=1> > &siteSection=1 > > Jim< > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Only 1% of calls are for fire. That's an interesting stat. Are they going to rotate all firefighters onto the ambulance? Otherwise only a few will be working while the rest get to watch TV at the fire house. I am glad they see it is a waste to send so many people and so much equipment to most calls. This should save tax dollars if done right. Renny > > http://www.emsresponder.com/article/article.jsp?id=14128 > http://www.emsresponder.com/article/article.jsp?id=14128&siteSection=1> > &siteSection=1 > > Jim< > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.