Guest guest Posted May 8, 2004 Report Share Posted May 8, 2004 Jumping in here - this is why if you possibly can, use a surgeon who does lots of these operations. In Birmingham, Mr. Treacy usually operates three days a week and does 5 or 6 a day. I believe Mr. McMinn does about the same. I imagine De Smet is in that category too. There's nothing like experience if you want the security of knowing you'll get a good result. Des Tuck In a message dated 5/8/2004 1:01:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time, tswilson@... writes: Ted I don't believe that that one doctor does only hip resurfacing, it's just that he is the biggest proponent of it of the 4. Although given the amount of operating time these guys are given, perhaps right now that's all he is doing as they try to get some patients under their belts (some of these doctors get 4-5 operating days a month - and the waitlists for hips are increasing at a rate of 9% every wix months!). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2004 Report Share Posted May 8, 2004 Ted I don't believe that that one doctor does only hip resurfacing, it's just that he is the biggest proponent of it of the 4. Although given the amount of operating time these guys are given, perhaps right now that's all he is doing as they try to get some patients under their belts (some of these doctors get 4-5 operating days a month - and the waitlists for hips are increasing at a rate of 9% every wix months!). I believe tho that Dr. Greidanus will refuse to do a woman in her late fifties and I was told by Garbuz when I wanted one that he wouldn't even talk to woman over 50 for resurfacing....perhaps he has changed his mind. Dr. Masri, another one of those doctors and the newest to do resurfacing of that bunch seems more receptive to a woman as long as her bones are strong - the problem being of course will you still have good bones by the time your name comes up. As these doctors get a better feel for resurfacing I believe they will promote it more - they say they need more evidence of it working - well we are all trying to give it to them. With respect to the Durom v. the others, really there is not a lot of difference and one of the Durom doctors told me that they are basically all the same - any claims about better " ratio clearance " etc are really just that - claims - there is a mathematial formula that they have to use...(don't ask me the math part)... Every manufacturer has small differences in the making of the device, or perhaps in the metallurgy to but it comes down to the one your doctor uses, or your personal preference if you choose to go somewhere else. Some devices have more size options and for some people that will become an important part of their choice. In your case, if your bones are strong now and there is not a lot of damage to the surface you are probably fine to wait. It's one of those things you need to keep an eye on - as a man you will tend to have better bones than we women but osteoporosis is not unheard of in men either. It is certainly something you need to keep an eye and if things get bad either beg Garbuz for an earlier appointment or go to England or Europe or India (virtually no waitlists in Europe and India - I believe England you can get in privately pretty fast too). I can tell you that Cliff and I continue to get stronger and better ROM even at 18 months out....it still surprises me on a regular basis and that grin on my face Oct 23/02 has never gone away!! Best of luck - any questions - ask away. Pamela LBHR De Smet Oct23/02 > There is now an approx. 2 year waiting list in Vancouver (Canada). The 4 doctors here have switched from using the Birmingham prosthesis to the Durom prosthesis which is approx. $1,000 less. The Durom has been used with 200,000 patients so far and there is evidence of it being a superior product IMHO. One of these 4 docors in Vancouver (all part of the same team) does only hip resurfacing but they all do not encourage hip resurfacing because they do not feel that there is sufficient evidence after only 10 years. I insisted with my Ortho. , Dr. Garbuz, that I wanted the hip resurfacing and I am now on an approx 18 month waitng list because I had visited him 8 months earlier. Should I wait this long or go to Birmingham or somewhere closer? I am not in severe constant pain and can hit tennis balls with limited movements. Should I avoid too much movement if my operation is so far away. Do I risk wearing out the femur bulb bone if I have very little cartilage left? Any thoughts or opinions are appreciated. I am gald that I discovered this Yahoo group just a few days ago. Thanks everybody for your great stories and sharing! > Ted > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2004 Report Share Posted May 8, 2004 Thanks Pamela. I really appreciate what you have said. Ted Re: Durom Resurfacing in Vancouver But 2 Years Ted I don't believe that that one doctor does only hip resurfacing, it's just that he is the biggest proponent of it of the 4. Although given the amount of operating time these guys are given, perhaps right now that's all he is doing as they try to get some patients under their belts (some of these doctors get 4-5 operating days a month - and the waitlists for hips are increasing at a rate of 9% every wix months!). I believe tho that Dr. Greidanus will refuse to do a woman in her late fifties and I was told by Garbuz when I wanted one that he wouldn't even talk to woman over 50 for resurfacing....perhaps he has changed his mind. Dr. Masri, another one of those doctors and the newest to do resurfacing of that bunch seems more receptive to a woman as long as her bones are strong - the problem being of course will you still have good bones by the time your name comes up. As these doctors get a better feel for resurfacing I believe they will promote it more - they say they need more evidence of it working - well we are all trying to give it to them. With respect to the Durom v. the others, really there is not a lot of difference and one of the Durom doctors told me that they are basically all the same - any claims about better " ratio clearance " etc are really just that - claims - there is a mathematial formula that they have to use...(don't ask me the math part)... Every manufacturer has small differences in the making of the device, or perhaps in the metallurgy to but it comes down to the one your doctor uses, or your personal preference if you choose to go somewhere else. Some devices have more size options and for some people that will become an important part of their choice. In your case, if your bones are strong now and there is not a lot of damage to the surface you are probably fine to wait. It's one of those things you need to keep an eye on - as a man you will tend to have better bones than we women but osteoporosis is not unheard of in men either. It is certainly something you need to keep an eye and if things get bad either beg Garbuz for an earlier appointment or go to England or Europe or India (virtually no waitlists in Europe and India - I believe England you can get in privately pretty fast too). I can tell you that Cliff and I continue to get stronger and better ROM even at 18 months out....it still surprises me on a regular basis and that grin on my face Oct 23/02 has never gone away!! Best of luck - any questions - ask away. Pamela LBHR De Smet Oct23/02 > There is now an approx. 2 year waiting list in Vancouver (Canada). The 4 doctors here have switched from using the Birmingham prosthesis to the Durom prosthesis which is approx. $1,000 less. The Durom has been used with 200,000 patients so far and there is evidence of it being a superior product IMHO. One of these 4 docors in Vancouver (all part of the same team) does only hip resurfacing but they all do not encourage hip resurfacing because they do not feel that there is sufficient evidence after only 10 years. I insisted with my Ortho. , Dr. Garbuz, that I wanted the hip resurfacing and I am now on an approx 18 month waitng list because I had visited him 8 months earlier. Should I wait this long or go to Birmingham or somewhere closer? I am not in severe constant pain and can hit tennis balls with limited movements. Should I avoid too much movement if my operation is so far away. Do I risk wearing out the femur bulb bone if I have very little cartilage left? Any thoughts or opinions are appreciated. I am gald that I discovered this Yahoo group just a few days ago. Thanks everybody for your great stories and sharing! > Ted > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2004 Report Share Posted May 8, 2004 -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie - In surfacehippy , " Pamela Jansen " wrote: > Ted I don't believe that that one doctor does only hip resurfacing, > it's just that he is the biggest proponent of it of the 4. Although > given the amount of operating time these guys are given, perhaps right > now that's all he is doing as they try to get some patients under > their belts (some of these doctors get 4-5 operating days a month - > and the waitlists for hips are increasing at a rate of 9% every wix > months!). I believe tho that Dr. Greidanus will refuse to do a woman > in her late fifties and I was told by Garbuz when I wanted one that he > wouldn't even talk to woman over 50 for resurfacing....perhaps he has > changed his mind. Dr. Masri, another one of those doctors and the > newest to do resurfacing of that bunch seems more receptive to a woman > as long as her bones are strong - the problem being of course will you > still have good bones by the time your name comes up. As these > doctors get a better feel for resurfacing I believe they will promote > it more - they say they need more evidence of it working - well we are > all trying to give it to them. > > With respect to the Durom v. the others, really there is not a lot of > difference and one of the Durom doctors told me that they are > basically all the same - any claims about better " ratio clearance " etc > are really just that - claims - there is a mathematial formula that > they have to use...(don't ask me the math part)... Every manufacturer > has small differences in the making of the device, or perhaps in the > metallurgy to but it comes down to the one your doctor uses, or your > personal preference if you choose to go somewhere else. Some devices > have more size options and for some people that will become an > important part of their choice. > > > In your case, if your bones are strong now and there is not a lot of > damage to the surface you are probably fine to wait. It's one of > those things you need to keep an eye on - as a man you will tend to > have better bones than we women but osteoporosis is not unheard of in > men either. It is certainly something you need to keep an eye and if > things get bad either beg Garbuz for an earlier appointment or go to > England or Europe or India (virtually no waitlists in Europe and India > - I believe England you can get in privately pretty fast too). > > I can tell you that Cliff and I continue to get stronger and better > ROM even at 18 months out....it still surprises me on a regular basis > and that grin on my face Oct 23/02 has never gone away!! > > Best of luck - any questions - ask away. > > Pamela > LBHR De Smet Oct23/02 > > > > > > There is now an approx. 2 year waiting list in Vancouver (Canada). > The 4 doctors here have switched from using the Birmingham prosthesis > to the Durom prosthesis which is approx. $1,000 less. The Durom has > been used with 200,000 patients so far and there is evidence of it > being a superior product IMHO. One of these 4 docors in Vancouver > (all part of the same team) does only hip resurfacing but they all do > not encourage hip resurfacing because they do not feel that there is > sufficient evidence after only 10 years. I insisted with my Ortho. , > Dr. Garbuz, that I wanted the hip resurfacing and I am now on > an approx 18 month waitng list because I had visited him 8 months > earlier. Should I wait this long or go to Birmingham or somewhere > closer? I am not in severe constant pain and can hit tennis balls > with limited movements. Should I avoid too much movement if my > operation is so far away. Do I risk wearing out the femur bulb bone > if I have very little cartilage left? Any thoughts or opinions are > appreciated. I am gald that I discovered this Yahoo group just a few > days ago. Thanks everybody for your great stories and sharing! > > Ted > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2004 Report Share Posted May 8, 2004 Hi Susie From my understanding of it bones don't go osteoporetic too fast............ My femur and head were going that way but hadn't been used properly for 35 years at that point........... They were still good for resurface at 53 and within 6 months were showing signs of regain.......... I didn't take any extra calcium or fosomax type stuff............ that gain came simply from reuse of the bones properly re weight bearing........... I think where you are menapause wise may also play a role here though.......... which is why they dish out the fosomax as many don't understand that it doesn't matter how much calcium you eat the body requires other chemicals to actually process it............ My OS said later in the day we may consider me taking fosomax - I come from a long line of osteoporic women.......... but at this point my body is doing quite fine on its own............ So the long and short will be how long you have to wait............ and what weight bearing exercise you can do now........ for again I am not even sure just taking fosamex without weight bearing exercise will make much difference to a femur........ i.e. the brain will not necessarily 'know' that that is where you meant the bone build up to happen.......... Edith LBHR Dr. L Walter Syd Aust 8/02 > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2004 Report Share Posted May 8, 2004 Hi Susie From my understanding of it bones don't go osteoporetic too fast............ My femur and head were going that way but hadn't been used properly for 35 years at that point........... They were still good for resurface at 53 and within 6 months were showing signs of regain.......... I didn't take any extra calcium or fosomax type stuff............ that gain came simply from reuse of the bones properly re weight bearing........... I think where you are menapause wise may also play a role here though.......... which is why they dish out the fosomax as many don't understand that it doesn't matter how much calcium you eat the body requires other chemicals to actually process it............ My OS said later in the day we may consider me taking fosomax - I come from a long line of osteoporic women.......... but at this point my body is doing quite fine on its own............ So the long and short will be how long you have to wait............ and what weight bearing exercise you can do now........ for again I am not even sure just taking fosamex without weight bearing exercise will make much difference to a femur........ i.e. the brain will not necessarily 'know' that that is where you meant the bone build up to happen.......... Edith LBHR Dr. L Walter Syd Aust 8/02 > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2004 Report Share Posted May 8, 2004 I had my right hip resurfaced by Dr De Smet in January and when I left I asked him about taking osteoporosis med cause I will have to do the second hip sometimes... He said " yes anything to keep your bone strong is good " . so I am taking Fosamax (my GP gave me half the dose recommended cause I am only " borderline " and it is to keep me from going down in this period where I cannot walk much - my other hip being a limitation - Sunita R BHR jan 2004 Re: Durom Resurfacing in Vancouver But 2 Years -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie - In surfacehippy , " Pamela Jansen " wrote: > Ted I don't believe that that one doctor does only hip resurfacing, > it's just that he is the biggest proponent of it of the 4. Although > given the amount of operating time these guys are given, perhaps right > now that's all he is doing as they try to get some patients under > their belts (some of these doctors get 4-5 operating days a month - > and the waitlists for hips are increasing at a rate of 9% every wix > months!). I believe tho that Dr. Greidanus will refuse to do a woman > in her late fifties and I was told by Garbuz when I wanted one that he > wouldn't even talk to woman over 50 for resurfacing....perhaps he has > changed his mind. Dr. Masri, another one of those doctors and the > newest to do resurfacing of that bunch seems more receptive to a woman > as long as her bones are strong - the problem being of course will you > still have good bones by the time your name comes up. As these > doctors get a better feel for resurfacing I believe they will promote > it more - they say they need more evidence of it working - well we are > all trying to give it to them. > > With respect to the Durom v. the others, really there is not a lot of > difference and one of the Durom doctors told me that they are > basically all the same - any claims about better " ratio clearance " etc > are really just that - claims - there is a mathematial formula that > they have to use...(don't ask me the math part)... Every manufacturer > has small differences in the making of the device, or perhaps in the > metallurgy to but it comes down to the one your doctor uses, or your > personal preference if you choose to go somewhere else. Some devices > have more size options and for some people that will become an > important part of their choice. > > > In your case, if your bones are strong now and there is not a lot of > damage to the surface you are probably fine to wait. It's one of > those things you need to keep an eye on - as a man you will tend to > have better bones than we women but osteoporosis is not unheard of in > men either. It is certainly something you need to keep an eye and if > things get bad either beg Garbuz for an earlier appointment or go to > England or Europe or India (virtually no waitlists in Europe and India > - I believe England you can get in privately pretty fast too). > > I can tell you that Cliff and I continue to get stronger and better > ROM even at 18 months out....it still surprises me on a regular basis > and that grin on my face Oct 23/02 has never gone away!! > > Best of luck - any questions - ask away. > > Pamela > LBHR De Smet Oct23/02 > > > > > > There is now an approx. 2 year waiting list in Vancouver (Canada). > The 4 doctors here have switched from using the Birmingham prosthesis > to the Durom prosthesis which is approx. $1,000 less. The Durom has > been used with 200,000 patients so far and there is evidence of it > being a superior product IMHO. One of these 4 docors in Vancouver > (all part of the same team) does only hip resurfacing but they all do > not encourage hip resurfacing because they do not feel that there is > sufficient evidence after only 10 years. I insisted with my Ortho. , > Dr. Garbuz, that I wanted the hip resurfacing and I am now on > an approx 18 month waitng list because I had visited him 8 months > earlier. Should I wait this long or go to Birmingham or somewhere > closer? I am not in severe constant pain and can hit tennis balls > with limited movements. Should I avoid too much movement if my > operation is so far away. Do I risk wearing out the femur bulb bone > if I have very little cartilage left? Any thoughts or opinions are > appreciated. I am gald that I discovered this Yahoo group just a few > days ago. Thanks everybody for your great stories and sharing! > > Ted > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 -Thank you Sunita!!!! Fosomax makes sense to me. How old are you? I'm starting to get worried that I might be too old for a resurf...I'm 51 and female...that's a gray area for re-surfing, I think. Susie - In surfacehippy , " Sunita Romeder " wrote: > I had my right hip resurfaced by Dr De Smet in January and when I left I asked him about taking osteoporosis med cause I will have to do the second hip sometimes... He said " yes anything to keep your bone strong is good " . so I am taking Fosamax (my GP gave me half the dose recommended cause I am only " borderline " and it is to keep me from going down in this period where I cannot walk much - my other hip being a limitation - > Sunita > R BHR jan 2004 > Re: Durom Resurfacing in Vancouver But 2 Years > > > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > > - In surfacehippy , " Pamela Jansen " > wrote: > > Ted I don't believe that that one doctor does only hip resurfacing, > > it's just that he is the biggest proponent of it of the 4. > Although > > given the amount of operating time these guys are given, perhaps > right > > now that's all he is doing as they try to get some patients under > > their belts (some of these doctors get 4-5 operating days a month - > > and the waitlists for hips are increasing at a rate of 9% every wix > > months!). I believe tho that Dr. Greidanus will refuse to do a > woman > > in her late fifties and I was told by Garbuz when I wanted one that > he > > wouldn't even talk to woman over 50 for resurfacing....perhaps he > has > > changed his mind. Dr. Masri, another one of those doctors and the > > newest to do resurfacing of that bunch seems more receptive to a > woman > > as long as her bones are strong - the problem being of course will > you > > still have good bones by the time your name comes up. As these > > doctors get a better feel for resurfacing I believe they will > promote > > it more - they say they need more evidence of it working - well we > are > > all trying to give it to them. > > > > With respect to the Durom v. the others, really there is not a lot > of > > difference and one of the Durom doctors told me that they are > > basically all the same - any claims about better " ratio clearance " > etc > > are really just that - claims - there is a mathematial formula that > > they have to use...(don't ask me the math part)... Every > manufacturer > > has small differences in the making of the device, or perhaps in the > > metallurgy to but it comes down to the one your doctor uses, or your > > personal preference if you choose to go somewhere else. Some > devices > > have more size options and for some people that will become an > > important part of their choice. > > > > > > In your case, if your bones are strong now and there is not a lot of > > damage to the surface you are probably fine to wait. It's one of > > those things you need to keep an eye on - as a man you will tend to > > have better bones than we women but osteoporosis is not unheard of > in > > men either. It is certainly something you need to keep an eye and > if > > things get bad either beg Garbuz for an earlier appointment or go to > > England or Europe or India (virtually no waitlists in Europe and > India > > - I believe England you can get in privately pretty fast too). > > > > I can tell you that Cliff and I continue to get stronger and better > > ROM even at 18 months out....it still surprises me on a regular > basis > > and that grin on my face Oct 23/02 has never gone away!! > > > > Best of luck - any questions - ask away. > > > > Pamela > > LBHR De Smet Oct23/02 > > > > > > > > > > > There is now an approx. 2 year waiting list in Vancouver > (Canada). > > The 4 doctors here have switched from using the Birmingham > prosthesis > > to the Durom prosthesis which is approx. $1,000 less. The Durom has > > been used with 200,000 patients so far and there is evidence of it > > being a superior product IMHO. One of these 4 docors in Vancouver > > (all part of the same team) does only hip resurfacing but they all > do > > not encourage hip resurfacing because they do not feel that there is > > sufficient evidence after only 10 years. I insisted with my > Ortho. , > > Dr. Garbuz, that I wanted the hip resurfacing and I am now on > > an approx 18 month waitng list because I had visited him 8 months > > earlier. Should I wait this long or go to Birmingham or somewhere > > closer? I am not in severe constant pain and can hit tennis balls > > with limited movements. Should I avoid too much movement if my > > operation is so far away. Do I risk wearing out the femur bulb bone > > if I have very little cartilage left? Any thoughts or opinions are > > appreciated. I am gald that I discovered this Yahoo group just a > few > > days ago. Thanks everybody for your great stories and sharing! > > > Ted > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 > Hi Susie > > From my understanding of it bones don't go osteoporetic too fast............ > My femur and head were going that way but hadn't been used properly for 35 > years at that point........... They were still good for resurface at 53 and > within 6 months were showing signs of regain.......... I didn't take any > extra calcium or fosomax type stuff............ that gain came simply from > reuse of the bones properly re weight bearing........... > > I think where you are menapause wise may also play a role here > though.......... which is why they dish out the fosomax as many don't > understand that it doesn't matter how much calcium you eat the body requires > other chemicals to actually process it............ My OS said later in the > day we may consider me taking fosomax - I come from a long line of > osteoporic women.......... but at this point my body is doing quite fine on > its own............ > > So the long and short will be how long you have to wait............ and what > weight bearing exercise you can do now........ for again I am not even sure > just taking fosamex without weight bearing exercise will make much > difference to a femur........ i.e. the brain will not necessarily 'know' > that that is where you meant the bone build up to happen.......... > > Edith LBHR Dr. L Walter Syd Aust 8/02 > > > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 > Hi Susie > > From my understanding of it bones don't go osteoporetic too fast............ > My femur and head were going that way but hadn't been used properly for 35 > years at that point........... They were still good for resurface at 53 and > within 6 months were showing signs of regain.......... I didn't take any > extra calcium or fosomax type stuff............ that gain came simply from > reuse of the bones properly re weight bearing........... > > I think where you are menapause wise may also play a role here > though.......... which is why they dish out the fosomax as many don't > understand that it doesn't matter how much calcium you eat the body requires > other chemicals to actually process it............ My OS said later in the > day we may consider me taking fosomax - I come from a long line of > osteoporic women.......... but at this point my body is doing quite fine on > its own............ > > So the long and short will be how long you have to wait............ and what > weight bearing exercise you can do now........ for again I am not even sure > just taking fosamex without weight bearing exercise will make much > difference to a femur........ i.e. the brain will not necessarily 'know' > that that is where you meant the bone build up to happen.......... > > Edith LBHR Dr. L Walter Syd Aust 8/02 > > > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 > Hi Susie > > From my understanding of it bones don't go osteoporetic too fast............ > My femur and head were going that way but hadn't been used properly for 35 > years at that point........... They were still good for resurface at 53 and > within 6 months were showing signs of regain.......... I didn't take any > extra calcium or fosomax type stuff............ that gain came simply from > reuse of the bones properly re weight bearing........... > > I think where you are menapause wise may also play a role here > though.......... which is why they dish out the fosomax as many don't > understand that it doesn't matter how much calcium you eat the body requires > other chemicals to actually process it............ My OS said later in the > day we may consider me taking fosomax - I come from a long line of > osteoporic women.......... but at this point my body is doing quite fine on > its own............ > > So the long and short will be how long you have to wait............ and what > weight bearing exercise you can do now........ for again I am not even sure > just taking fosamex without weight bearing exercise will make much > difference to a femur........ i.e. the brain will not necessarily 'know' > that that is where you meant the bone build up to happen.......... > > Edith LBHR Dr. L Walter Syd Aust 8/02 > > > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 > Hi Susie > > From my understanding of it bones don't go osteoporetic too fast............ > My femur and head were going that way but hadn't been used properly for 35 > years at that point........... They were still good for resurface at 53 and > within 6 months were showing signs of regain.......... I didn't take any > extra calcium or fosomax type stuff............ that gain came simply from > reuse of the bones properly re weight bearing........... > > I think where you are menapause wise may also play a role here > though.......... which is why they dish out the fosomax as many don't > understand that it doesn't matter how much calcium you eat the body requires > other chemicals to actually process it............ My OS said later in the > day we may consider me taking fosomax - I come from a long line of > osteoporic women.......... but at this point my body is doing quite fine on > its own............ > > So the long and short will be how long you have to wait............ and what > weight bearing exercise you can do now........ for again I am not even sure > just taking fosamex without weight bearing exercise will make much > difference to a femur........ i.e. the brain will not necessarily 'know' > that that is where you meant the bone build up to happen.......... > > Edith LBHR Dr. L Walter Syd Aust 8/02 > > > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 > Hi Susie > > From my understanding of it bones don't go osteoporetic too fast............ > My femur and head were going that way but hadn't been used properly for 35 > years at that point........... They were still good for resurface at 53 and > within 6 months were showing signs of regain.......... I didn't take any > extra calcium or fosomax type stuff............ that gain came simply from > reuse of the bones properly re weight bearing........... > > I think where you are menapause wise may also play a role here > though.......... which is why they dish out the fosomax as many don't > understand that it doesn't matter how much calcium you eat the body requires > other chemicals to actually process it............ My OS said later in the > day we may consider me taking fosomax - I come from a long line of > osteoporic women.......... but at this point my body is doing quite fine on > its own............ > > So the long and short will be how long you have to wait............ and what > weight bearing exercise you can do now........ for again I am not even sure > just taking fosamex without weight bearing exercise will make much > difference to a femur........ i.e. the brain will not necessarily 'know' > that that is where you meant the bone build up to happen.......... > > Edith LBHR Dr. L Walter Syd Aust 8/02 > > > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 Thanks Edith for your thoughts! I've not had a bone scan but I did happen across a bone " screening " one day at a public event...the heel test...it concluded that I had osteopenia...don't know just how reliable this screening tool is but...I think I might give fosomax a try just to be on the safe side. I, too come from a long line of osteoporetic women. What you say about the weight bearing certainly makes sense and I am in the midst of a self-improvement conditioning program...I'm a protrusio acetabulum (Otto Pelvis) person and am truly losing range of motion fairly fast...it's scarey...but I can sure climb up and down our stairs every day with varying amounts of pain and I'm gonna try an eliptical trainer and water aerobics...any other suggestions? Water aerobics is not weight bearing...and the eliptical machine is..I guess.. about as weight bearing as I'm gonna be able to tolerable but it's probably not that great. I have been watching my diet very closely and have lost mostly all of my extra weight but I'm about a week away from joining the nearby fitness center..my tempoary job is about to end and free me up for my job of getting myself into shape. Thanks for all of your helpful suggestions. Susie > Hi Susie > > From my understanding of it bones don't go osteoporetic too fast............ > My femur and head were going that way but hadn't been used properly for 35 > years at that point........... They were still good for resurface at 53 and > within 6 months were showing signs of regain.......... I didn't take any > extra calcium or fosomax type stuff............ that gain came simply from > reuse of the bones properly re weight bearing........... > > I think where you are menapause wise may also play a role here > though.......... which is why they dish out the fosomax as many don't > understand that it doesn't matter how much calcium you eat the body requires > other chemicals to actually process it............ My OS said later in the > day we may consider me taking fosomax - I come from a long line of > osteoporic women.......... but at this point my body is doing quite fine on > its own............ > > So the long and short will be how long you have to wait............ and what > weight bearing exercise you can do now........ for again I am not even sure > just taking fosamex without weight bearing exercise will make much > difference to a femur........ i.e. the brain will not necessarily 'know' > that that is where you meant the bone build up to happen.......... > > Edith LBHR Dr. L Walter Syd Aust 8/02 > > > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 Dear Susie, I'm 60 and I was resurfed in November. Someone 64 was being resurfaced at the same time, and I know a 67 year old man who was resurfaced. The only worry for woman our age, as I understand it, is whether there is osteoporosis and this has affected the bone density. My OS told me that recently some woman in their late 50's were resurfaced and the bone underneath crumbled because of osteoporosis that had not been fully checked out. Eleanor Re: Durom Resurfacing in Vancouver But 2 Years -Thank you Sunita!!!! Fosomax makes sense to me. How old are you? I'm starting to get worried that I might be too old for a resurf...I'm 51 and female...that's a gray area for re-surfing, I think. Susie - In surfacehippy , " Sunita Romeder " wrote: > I had my right hip resurfaced by Dr De Smet in January and when I left I asked him about taking osteoporosis med cause I will have to do the second hip sometimes... He said " yes anything to keep your bone strong is good " . so I am taking Fosamax (my GP gave me half the dose recommended cause I am only " borderline " and it is to keep me from going down in this period where I cannot walk much - my other hip being a limitation - > Sunita > R BHR jan 2004 > Re: Durom Resurfacing in Vancouver But 2 Years > > > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > > - In surfacehippy , " Pamela Jansen " > wrote: > > Ted I don't believe that that one doctor does only hip resurfacing, > > it's just that he is the biggest proponent of it of the 4. > Although > > given the amount of operating time these guys are given, perhaps > right > > now that's all he is doing as they try to get some patients under > > their belts (some of these doctors get 4-5 operating days a month - > > and the waitlists for hips are increasing at a rate of 9% every wix > > months!). I believe tho that Dr. Greidanus will refuse to do a > woman > > in her late fifties and I was told by Garbuz when I wanted one that > he > > wouldn't even talk to woman over 50 for resurfacing....perhaps he > has > > changed his mind. Dr. Masri, another one of those doctors and the > > newest to do resurfacing of that bunch seems more receptive to a > woman > > as long as her bones are strong - the problem being of course will > you > > still have good bones by the time your name comes up. As these > > doctors get a better feel for resurfacing I believe they will > promote > > it more - they say they need more evidence of it working - well we > are > > all trying to give it to them. > > > > With respect to the Durom v. the others, really there is not a lot > of > > difference and one of the Durom doctors told me that they are > > basically all the same - any claims about better " ratio clearance " > etc > > are really just that - claims - there is a mathematial formula that > > they have to use...(don't ask me the math part)... Every > manufacturer > > has small differences in the making of the device, or perhaps in the > > metallurgy to but it comes down to the one your doctor uses, or your > > personal preference if you choose to go somewhere else. Some > devices > > have more size options and for some people that will become an > > important part of their choice. > > > > > > In your case, if your bones are strong now and there is not a lot of > > damage to the surface you are probably fine to wait. It's one of > > those things you need to keep an eye on - as a man you will tend to > > have better bones than we women but osteoporosis is not unheard of > in > > men either. It is certainly something you need to keep an eye and > if > > things get bad either beg Garbuz for an earlier appointment or go to > > England or Europe or India (virtually no waitlists in Europe and > India > > - I believe England you can get in privately pretty fast too). > > > > I can tell you that Cliff and I continue to get stronger and better > > ROM even at 18 months out....it still surprises me on a regular > basis > > and that grin on my face Oct 23/02 has never gone away!! > > > > Best of luck - any questions - ask away. > > > > Pamela > > LBHR De Smet Oct23/02 > > > > > > > > > > > There is now an approx. 2 year waiting list in Vancouver > (Canada). > > The 4 doctors here have switched from using the Birmingham > prosthesis > > to the Durom prosthesis which is approx. $1,000 less. The Durom has > > been used with 200,000 patients so far and there is evidence of it > > being a superior product IMHO. One of these 4 docors in Vancouver > > (all part of the same team) does only hip resurfacing but they all > do > > not encourage hip resurfacing because they do not feel that there is > > sufficient evidence after only 10 years. I insisted with my > Ortho. , > > Dr. Garbuz, that I wanted the hip resurfacing and I am now on > > an approx 18 month waitng list because I had visited him 8 months > > earlier. Should I wait this long or go to Birmingham or somewhere > > closer? I am not in severe constant pain and can hit tennis balls > > with limited movements. Should I avoid too much movement if my > > operation is so far away. Do I risk wearing out the femur bulb bone > > if I have very little cartilage left? Any thoughts or opinions are > > appreciated. I am gald that I discovered this Yahoo group just a > few > > days ago. Thanks everybody for your great stories and sharing! > > > Ted > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 don't worry Susie and check with your OS. I am 61! and De Smet did not hesitate to resurface my hip however here in Vancouver the OS don't want to take any risk whatsoever! De Smet told me there was a very small risk of femoral head fracture but he said he only had one or two in his 1000 surgeries. Who is your surgeon in Vancouver? sunita Re: Durom Resurfacing in Vancouver But 2 Years > > > -Ted, interesting tidbit about the Durom....we are basically in the > same boat...waiting for surgery and not really knowing when to > say " just do it " ...anyway...I am a female..age 51..and wondering if I > should be taking fosomax/actonel in the meantime for bone > strengthening...hmmm...I posted a thread about this but got no > responses....I'm worried that my bones will become osteoporetic > during my " wait " time. Any thoughts on this anyone? Susie > > - In surfacehippy , " Pamela Jansen " > wrote: > > Ted I don't believe that that one doctor does only hip resurfacing, > > it's just that he is the biggest proponent of it of the 4. > Although > > given the amount of operating time these guys are given, perhaps > right > > now that's all he is doing as they try to get some patients under > > their belts (some of these doctors get 4-5 operating days a month - > > and the waitlists for hips are increasing at a rate of 9% every wix > > months!). I believe tho that Dr. Greidanus will refuse to do a > woman > > in her late fifties and I was told by Garbuz when I wanted one that > he > > wouldn't even talk to woman over 50 for resurfacing....perhaps he > has > > changed his mind. Dr. Masri, another one of those doctors and the > > newest to do resurfacing of that bunch seems more receptive to a > woman > > as long as her bones are strong - the problem being of course will > you > > still have good bones by the time your name comes up. As these > > doctors get a better feel for resurfacing I believe they will > promote > > it more - they say they need more evidence of it working - well we > are > > all trying to give it to them. > > > > With respect to the Durom v. the others, really there is not a lot > of > > difference and one of the Durom doctors told me that they are > > basically all the same - any claims about better " ratio clearance " > etc > > are really just that - claims - there is a mathematial formula that > > they have to use...(don't ask me the math part)... Every > manufacturer > > has small differences in the making of the device, or perhaps in the > > metallurgy to but it comes down to the one your doctor uses, or your > > personal preference if you choose to go somewhere else. Some > devices > > have more size options and for some people that will become an > > important part of their choice. > > > > > > In your case, if your bones are strong now and there is not a lot of > > damage to the surface you are probably fine to wait. It's one of > > those things you need to keep an eye on - as a man you will tend to > > have better bones than we women but osteoporosis is not unheard of > in > > men either. It is certainly something you need to keep an eye and > if > > things get bad either beg Garbuz for an earlier appointment or go to > > England or Europe or India (virtually no waitlists in Europe and > India > > - I believe England you can get in privately pretty fast too). > > > > I can tell you that Cliff and I continue to get stronger and better > > ROM even at 18 months out....it still surprises me on a regular > basis > > and that grin on my face Oct 23/02 has never gone away!! > > > > Best of luck - any questions - ask away. > > > > Pamela > > LBHR De Smet Oct23/02 > > > > > > > > > > > There is now an approx. 2 year waiting list in Vancouver > (Canada). > > The 4 doctors here have switched from using the Birmingham > prosthesis > > to the Durom prosthesis which is approx. $1,000 less. The Durom has > > been used with 200,000 patients so far and there is evidence of it > > being a superior product IMHO. One of these 4 docors in Vancouver > > (all part of the same team) does only hip resurfacing but they all > do > > not encourage hip resurfacing because they do not feel that there is > > sufficient evidence after only 10 years. I insisted with my > Ortho. , > > Dr. Garbuz, that I wanted the hip resurfacing and I am now on > > an approx 18 month waitng list because I had visited him 8 months > > earlier. Should I wait this long or go to Birmingham or somewhere > > closer? I am not in severe constant pain and can hit tennis balls > > with limited movements. Should I avoid too much movement if my > > operation is so far away. Do I risk wearing out the femur bulb bone > > if I have very little cartilage left? Any thoughts or opinions are > > appreciated. I am gald that I discovered this Yahoo group just a > few > > days ago. Thanks everybody for your great stories and sharing! > > > Ted > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 Did I miss something when Ted stated " The Durom has been used with 200,000 patients so far and there is evidence of it " Was he stating that 200,000 Duron resurfacing devices have been used on patients? That's more than all the manufactures combined!!! Michigandar Mike Bilateral, Dr.DeSmet 4/2003 > > being a superior product IMHO. There is now an approx. 2 year waiting list in Vancouver (Canada). The 4 doctors here have switched from using the Birmingham prosthesis to the Durom prosthesis which is approx. $1,000 less. The Durom has been used with 200,000 patients so far and there is evidence of it being a superior product IMHO. One of these 4 docors in Vancouver (all part of the same team) does only hip resurfacing but they all do not encourage hip resurfacing because they do not feel that there is sufficient evidence after only 10 years. I insisted with my Ortho. , Dr. Garbuz, that I wanted the hip resurfacing and I am now on an approx 18 month waitng list because I had visited him 8 months earlier. Should I wait this long or go to Birmingham or somewhere closer? I am not in severe constant pain and can hit tennis balls with limited movements. Should I avoid too much movement if my operation is so far away. Do I risk wearing out the femur bulb bone if I have very little cartilage left? Any thoughts or opinions are appreciated. I am gald that I discovered this Yahoo group just a few days ago. Thanks everybody for your great stories and haring! Ted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 Hi Susie I had my right hip resurfaced at age 53, after four years of it being " locked " into a limited range of motion and losing bone density. I know lots of other women in their 50's and older who have had it done, so don't listen to the OS's who refuse to resurf post-menopausal women. They are just being conservative. I recently met at woman in her 70's who was off to Belgium for a resurf from Dr. DeSmet. She is still playing tennis, and has good bone density. Now I'm almost 7 months post-op, I love my new mobility, and I'm so glad I didn't have a Total Hip Replacement, as was originally recommended, because I've still got most of my femur intact, and it's getting stronger all the time. n rBHR Oct.17/03 McMinn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.