Guest guest Posted March 21, 2005 Report Share Posted March 21, 2005 > When labs run blood tests for magnesium levels, they're testing for > intercellular magnesium, which is the part in the serum. However, 99% of the body's magnesium is stored intracellularly. So the standard lab test is only reporting on the 1% of magnesium that is not in the cell, and thus it really doesn't give an accurate reflection of the magnesium levels. It is possible to do a test on the intracellular component, but it's very expensive and requires a specialized lab. > I don't know about potassium, but maybe most of it is also intracellular, and thus the standard test wouldn't be very accurate. > > Winona, you seem to be knowledgeable about lab tests. I just read about this. Could you confirm if I'm reporting this correctly? > > Water retention is listed as a potassium deficiency symptom in my > Nutritional Balancing book. > Lynn ____________ Lynn, You are right about the magnesium. You would have to be about 95% deficient in magnesium in order for the serum magnesium level to be low. The best test is one that can test the magnesium that is INSIDE the cell. This test is not readily available. Potassium, on the other hand, can be measured very well using the plasma. It is run by almost every lab and is generally very accurate. Yes, potassium deficiency usually causes water retention. Diuretics usually flush potassium AND magnesium out of your system - so it is probably prudent to supplement with both when you take diuretics. Winona Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > Lynn, > You are right about the magnesium. You would have to be about 95% > deficient in magnesium in order for the serum magnesium level to be > low. The best test is one that can test the magnesium that is INSIDE > the cell. This test is not readily available. > > Potassium, on the other hand, can be measured very well using the > plasma. It is run by almost every lab and is generally very accurate. > Yes, potassium deficiency usually causes water retention. Diuretics > usually flush potassium AND magnesium out of your system - so it is > probably prudent to supplement with both when you take diuretics. > > Winona Winona I know most of your intercellular fluid is sodium based, saline, and the intracellular is potassium. What I cannot seem to find is that is there a ratio that we should keep, I know we shoud keep this balanced other wise your in for some trouble. What I am looking for is a unreported ratio that we could use from the serum levels? Also could PH be a marker for this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > Lynn, > You are right about the magnesium. You would have to be about 95% > deficient in magnesium in order for the serum magnesium level to be > low. The best test is one that can test the magnesium that is INSIDE > the cell. This test is not readily available. > > Potassium, on the other hand, can be measured very well using the > plasma. It is run by almost every lab and is generally very accurate. > Yes, potassium deficiency usually causes water retention. Diuretics > usually flush potassium AND magnesium out of your system - so it is > probably prudent to supplement with both when you take diuretics. > > Winona Winona I know most of your intercellular fluid is sodium based, saline, and the intracellular is potassium. What I cannot seem to find is that is there a ratio that we should keep, I know we shoud keep this balanced other wise your in for some trouble. What I am looking for is a unreported ratio that we could use from the serum levels? Also could PH be a marker for this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > Winona > I know most of your intercellular fluid is sodium based, saline, and > the intracellular is potassium. What I cannot seem to find is that > is there a ratio that we should keep, I know we shoud keep this > balanced other wise your in for some trouble. What I am looking for > is a unreported ratio that we could use from the serum levels? Also > could PH be a marker for this? > ______________________ : I thought you'd find this reference interesting. It doesn't answer your exact question - but had good information about ion transport. Magnesium Research (1993) 6, 2, 167-177 Regulation of sodium and potassium pathways by magnesium in cell membranes http://www.mgwater.com/dur09.shtml Winona Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > Winona > I know most of your intercellular fluid is sodium based, saline, and > the intracellular is potassium. What I cannot seem to find is that > is there a ratio that we should keep, I know we shoud keep this > balanced other wise your in for some trouble. What I am looking for > is a unreported ratio that we could use from the serum levels? Also > could PH be a marker for this? > ______________________ : I thought you'd find this reference interesting. It doesn't answer your exact question - but had good information about ion transport. Magnesium Research (1993) 6, 2, 167-177 Regulation of sodium and potassium pathways by magnesium in cell membranes http://www.mgwater.com/dur09.shtml Winona Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > : > > I thought you'd find this reference interesting. It doesn't answer > your exact question - but had good information about ion transport. > > Magnesium Research (1993) 6, 2, 167-177 > Regulation of sodium and potassium pathways by magnesium in cell membranes > > http://www.mgwater.com/dur09.shtml > > Winona It was a little out of my league, but I picked up on some things. This really caught my eye, The major part of the studies concerns the effects of extracellular magnesium. Extracellular Mg2+ blocks the passive movements of Na+ and K+ across the membrane of heart cells 8. Didn't you say something about magnisium being good in congestive heart failure before? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > : > > I thought you'd find this reference interesting. It doesn't answer > your exact question - but had good information about ion transport. > > Magnesium Research (1993) 6, 2, 167-177 > Regulation of sodium and potassium pathways by magnesium in cell membranes > > http://www.mgwater.com/dur09.shtml > > Winona It was a little out of my league, but I picked up on some things. This really caught my eye, The major part of the studies concerns the effects of extracellular magnesium. Extracellular Mg2+ blocks the passive movements of Na+ and K+ across the membrane of heart cells 8. Didn't you say something about magnisium being good in congestive heart failure before? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > : > > I thought you'd find this reference interesting. It doesn't answer > your exact question - but had good information about ion transport. > > Magnesium Research (1993) 6, 2, 167-177 > Regulation of sodium and potassium pathways by magnesium in cell membranes > > http://www.mgwater.com/dur09.shtml > > Winona It was a little out of my league, but I picked up on some things. This really caught my eye, The major part of the studies concerns the effects of extracellular magnesium. Extracellular Mg2+ blocks the passive movements of Na+ and K+ across the membrane of heart cells 8. Didn't you say something about magnisium being good in congestive heart failure before? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > Winona > I know most of your intercellular fluid is sodium based, saline, and > the intracellular is potassium. What I cannot seem to find is that > is there a ratio that we should keep, I know we shoud keep this > balanced other wise your in for some trouble. What I am looking for > is a unreported ratio that we could use from the serum levels? Also > could PH be a marker for this? > > , The optimal Na/K ratio in hair analysis is 2.5. I don't know if that has any applicability to blood tests. Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > Winona > I know most of your intercellular fluid is sodium based, saline, and > the intracellular is potassium. What I cannot seem to find is that > is there a ratio that we should keep, I know we shoud keep this > balanced other wise your in for some trouble. What I am looking for > is a unreported ratio that we could use from the serum levels? Also > could PH be a marker for this? > > , The optimal Na/K ratio in hair analysis is 2.5. I don't know if that has any applicability to blood tests. Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 > Winona > I know most of your intercellular fluid is sodium based, saline, and > the intracellular is potassium. What I cannot seem to find is that > is there a ratio that we should keep, I know we shoud keep this > balanced other wise your in for some trouble. What I am looking for > is a unreported ratio that we could use from the serum levels? Also > could PH be a marker for this? > > , The optimal Na/K ratio in hair analysis is 2.5. I don't know if that has any applicability to blood tests. Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2005 Report Share Posted March 23, 2005 > It was a little out of my league, but I picked up on some things. > This really caught my eye, > > The major part of the studies concerns the effects of extracellular > magnesium. Extracellular Mg2+ blocks the passive movements of Na+ and > K+ across the membrane of heart cells 8. > > Didn't you say something about magnisium being good in congestive > heart failure before? > > ____________________ , I'm not totally sure about how to interpret that statement - but my take on it is that magnesium prevents PASSIVE movement of Na+ and K+ thereby facilitating the orderly movement as required for the proper function. Therefore if more potassium is required inside the cell than outside, magnesium helps man the gate (channels) - and only allows passage as required. Magnesium is one of the minerals that is very good for the heart. There are serveral references at this site: http://www.mgwater.com/listc.shtml#heart Winona Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2005 Report Share Posted March 23, 2005 > > , > I'm not totally sure about how to interpret that statement - but my > take on it is that magnesium prevents PASSIVE movement of Na+ and K+ > thereby facilitating the orderly movement as required for the proper > function. Therefore if more potassium is required inside the cell > than outside, magnesium helps man the gate (channels) - and only > allows passage as required. > > Magnesium is one of the minerals that is very good for the heart. > There are serveral references at this site: > http://www.mgwater.com/listc.shtml#heart > > Winona Well that sucks, it makes two of us that don't fully understand it. LOL Usually when I read these detailed studies I have to beat my head on the wll to force the info in, kinda like a osmosis thing. By about the fifth time I am usualy bleeding so.......I either give up because I understand it or quit because I hate painting, my wife would hate me if i left blood stains on the wall. In all my readings I have never run across the potassium or sodium pumps that they talk about here, i am a little familiar with iodine and calcium pumps, calcium pumps are very important for cell to cell communication, probably the most important. I think that is what they were implying when they said that the K and NA pumps were secondary pumps for this purpose. Now towards the begining they were saying something about a weakened cell membrane, so I think what they mean by passive in this study is that it is essiantly cell leakage, or that the passive fluid was not ment to get out, I am assuming they would call it something else if it was ment to be let out or ran through its pump into the next cell. Am I making sense to you or do I need to hit the wall some more? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2005 Report Share Posted March 23, 2005 > > , > I'm not totally sure about how to interpret that statement - but my > take on it is that magnesium prevents PASSIVE movement of Na+ and K+ > thereby facilitating the orderly movement as required for the proper > function. Therefore if more potassium is required inside the cell > than outside, magnesium helps man the gate (channels) - and only > allows passage as required. > > Magnesium is one of the minerals that is very good for the heart. > There are serveral references at this site: > http://www.mgwater.com/listc.shtml#heart > > Winona Well that sucks, it makes two of us that don't fully understand it. LOL Usually when I read these detailed studies I have to beat my head on the wll to force the info in, kinda like a osmosis thing. By about the fifth time I am usualy bleeding so.......I either give up because I understand it or quit because I hate painting, my wife would hate me if i left blood stains on the wall. In all my readings I have never run across the potassium or sodium pumps that they talk about here, i am a little familiar with iodine and calcium pumps, calcium pumps are very important for cell to cell communication, probably the most important. I think that is what they were implying when they said that the K and NA pumps were secondary pumps for this purpose. Now towards the begining they were saying something about a weakened cell membrane, so I think what they mean by passive in this study is that it is essiantly cell leakage, or that the passive fluid was not ment to get out, I am assuming they would call it something else if it was ment to be let out or ran through its pump into the next cell. Am I making sense to you or do I need to hit the wall some more? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2005 Report Share Posted March 23, 2005 > > , > I'm not totally sure about how to interpret that statement - but my > take on it is that magnesium prevents PASSIVE movement of Na+ and K+ > thereby facilitating the orderly movement as required for the proper > function. Therefore if more potassium is required inside the cell > than outside, magnesium helps man the gate (channels) - and only > allows passage as required. > > Magnesium is one of the minerals that is very good for the heart. > There are serveral references at this site: > http://www.mgwater.com/listc.shtml#heart > > Winona Well that sucks, it makes two of us that don't fully understand it. LOL Usually when I read these detailed studies I have to beat my head on the wll to force the info in, kinda like a osmosis thing. By about the fifth time I am usualy bleeding so.......I either give up because I understand it or quit because I hate painting, my wife would hate me if i left blood stains on the wall. In all my readings I have never run across the potassium or sodium pumps that they talk about here, i am a little familiar with iodine and calcium pumps, calcium pumps are very important for cell to cell communication, probably the most important. I think that is what they were implying when they said that the K and NA pumps were secondary pumps for this purpose. Now towards the begining they were saying something about a weakened cell membrane, so I think what they mean by passive in this study is that it is essiantly cell leakage, or that the passive fluid was not ment to get out, I am assuming they would call it something else if it was ment to be let out or ran through its pump into the next cell. Am I making sense to you or do I need to hit the wall some more? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.