Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 For those of you who have had the FISH staining, how high were your cancer markers? My son's CA 19-9 is climbing every 6 months and is now 384. His GGT is 289. He will schedule an MRI and then he will speak with his Dr. If his Dr. doesn't bring up the need for the FISH staining, should we? Also, since the high dose urso bit, he has dropped his urso for the first time from 1800 mg /day to 1500mg day and his numbers there are climbing too. ALP 311 to 455 AST 64 to 88 ALT 65 to 77 bili .9 to 1.6 high for the first time since diagnosis. His albumin also went low to 2.9 We are of course very concerned. Thanks , Lee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Dear Lee; I'm sorry to hear about Bill's rising ALP, bilirubin and CA-19-9. It's possible that this could be due to a dominant bile duct stricture: Z Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;43(6):587-90. Impact of dominant stenoses on the serum level of the tumor marker CA19-9 in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. sen-Benz C, Stiehl A Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Medizinische Klinik IV, Universitätskliniken Köln, Germany. .Benz@... BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) have an increased risk of developing hepatobiliary tumors. The tumor marker CA19-9 was claimed to indicate the occurrence of bile duct carcinoma. This study aimed to assess whether increased serum levels of CA19-9 in PSC patients with dominant stenoses indicate bile duct carcinoma. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 106 patients treated over a median time of 5.0 years (range 0.5 - 13 years). All patients were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and whenever they developed dominant stenoses by endoscopic dilatation of these stenoses. In endoscopically treated patients, CA19-9 levels were measured before and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after endoscopic dilatation. RESULTS: Of the 106 patients, 22 carcinoma-free patients and 3 patients with bile duct carcinoma had elevated CA 19-9 levels. In 14 out of 25 patients with elevated CA19-9 levels, dominant stenoses were diagnosed and treated by endoscopic dilatation. In 71.4 % of the endoscopically treated patients, CA19-9 levels decreased following the endoscopic intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In PSC patients, increased serum levels of CA19-9 are rarely due to the development of bile duct carcinoma. In patients with dominant stenoses, the relief of biliary obstruction by endoscopic dilatation may lead to a decrease of the serum levels of CA19-9. PMID: 15986288. Perhaps an MRCP might be able to detect if a dominant stricture (stenosis) exists, and if so, then an ERCP and balloon dilatation might then relieve this blockage. If the CA19-9 then declines to normal (as indiccated in the above paper), then this would alleviate your concerns about cholangiocarcinoma. If they do an ERCP, then at the same time they could take brushings for cytological examination and FISH. But, I'll keep my fingers crossed that it may be a stricture. Best regards, Dave R. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Bria, Rising CA 19-9 is of course a major source of concern. I would like to tell you though that a few years ago I had the same problem with CA 19-9 and my LFTs. My hepatologist decided to perform an ERCP to check for strictures and take biopsies. While performing the ERCP it was decided to insert a stent to open a stricture. The LFTs after the stent placement were normal, as was the CA 19-9. Therefore I agree with post that it can be a stricture. In addition, even though 384 is high for CA 19-9, it is not that high. I remember someone (I am not using names on purpose) on this forum who did get CCA who had values of 18000. In my humble opinion it is just a blockage at this level. I, of course, am not a doctor in any shape or form. I am just telling you my experience. Regards, Chaim Boermeester, Israel. From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Bria Lee Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 02:18 To: Subject: CA 19-9/ GGT/ ? FISH For those of you who have had the FISH staining, how high were your cancer markers? My son's CA 19-9 is climbing every 6 months and is now 384. His GGT is 289. He will schedule an MRI and then he will speak with his Dr. If his Dr. doesn't bring up the need for the FISH staining, should we? Also, since the high dose urso bit, he has dropped his urso for the first time from 1800 mg /day to 1500mg day and his numbers there are climbing too. ALP 311 to 455 AST 64 to 88 ALT 65 to 77 bili .9 to 1.6 high for the first time since diagnosis. His albumin also went low to 2.9 We are of course very concerned. Thanks , Lee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.