Guest guest Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly performed in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The risk of complications associated with this procedure is not well established in these patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the risk of ERCP complications in PSC vs. non-PSC patients. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19259076 Barb in Texas - Together in the Fight - Whatever it Takes! Son Ken (34) UC 91 PSC 99, LTX 6/21 & 6/30 2007 @ Baylor/Dallas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Its nice to know upfront there are more complications with PSC patients and procedure usually take longer. I would suspect taking a preventative round of antibodies would help. Yes more study needed! Ian Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly performed in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The risk of complications associated with this procedure is not well established in these patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the risk of ERCP complications in PSC vs. non-PSC patients. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19259076 Barb in Texas - Together in the Fight - Whatever it Takes! Son Ken (34) UC 91 PSC 99, LTX 6/21 & 6/30 2007 @ Baylor/Dallas -- Ian Cribb P.Eng. (6... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Its nice to know upfront there are more complications with PSC patients and procedure usually take longer. I would suspect taking a preventative round of antibodies would help. Yes more study needed! Ian Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly performed in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The risk of complications associated with this procedure is not well established in these patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the risk of ERCP complications in PSC vs. non-PSC patients. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19259076 Barb in Texas - Together in the Fight - Whatever it Takes! Son Ken (34) UC 91 PSC 99, LTX 6/21 & 6/30 2007 @ Baylor/Dallas -- Ian Cribb P.Eng. (6... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Its nice to know upfront there are more complications with PSC patients and procedure usually take longer. I would suspect taking a preventative round of antibodies would help. Yes more study needed! Ian Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly performed in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The risk of complications associated with this procedure is not well established in these patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the risk of ERCP complications in PSC vs. non-PSC patients. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19259076 Barb in Texas - Together in the Fight - Whatever it Takes! Son Ken (34) UC 91 PSC 99, LTX 6/21 & 6/30 2007 @ Baylor/Dallas -- Ian Cribb P.Eng. (6... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 ----Original Message----- On Behalf Of Ian Cribb Its nice to know upfront there are more complications with PSC patients and procedure usually take longer. Not sure I agree with you Ian, the way I read it there really weren’t more complications. “The overall rate of complications in patients with PSC when compared to non-PSC patients was not significantly different (18/168 (11%) vs. 76/981 (8%), P=0.2) 11% vs. 8% isn’t that big of a deal, especially considering all the differences that naturally come with PSC patients. The risks of complications such as Pancreatitis, perforation, and bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups despite their demographic and procedural variations. The duration of hospitalization due to complications was also not significantly different between the two groups. I’m didn’t read it the same way you did Ian, sure hope I’m right, the way I read it - is far better news for PSCer’s. Barb in Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 ----Original Message----- On Behalf Of Ian Cribb Its nice to know upfront there are more complications with PSC patients and procedure usually take longer. Not sure I agree with you Ian, the way I read it there really weren’t more complications. “The overall rate of complications in patients with PSC when compared to non-PSC patients was not significantly different (18/168 (11%) vs. 76/981 (8%), P=0.2) 11% vs. 8% isn’t that big of a deal, especially considering all the differences that naturally come with PSC patients. The risks of complications such as Pancreatitis, perforation, and bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups despite their demographic and procedural variations. The duration of hospitalization due to complications was also not significantly different between the two groups. I’m didn’t read it the same way you did Ian, sure hope I’m right, the way I read it - is far better news for PSCer’s. Barb in Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 ----Original Message----- On Behalf Of Ian Cribb Its nice to know upfront there are more complications with PSC patients and procedure usually take longer. Not sure I agree with you Ian, the way I read it there really weren’t more complications. “The overall rate of complications in patients with PSC when compared to non-PSC patients was not significantly different (18/168 (11%) vs. 76/981 (8%), P=0.2) 11% vs. 8% isn’t that big of a deal, especially considering all the differences that naturally come with PSC patients. The risks of complications such as Pancreatitis, perforation, and bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups despite their demographic and procedural variations. The duration of hospitalization due to complications was also not significantly different between the two groups. I’m didn’t read it the same way you did Ian, sure hope I’m right, the way I read it - is far better news for PSCer’s. Barb in Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.