Re: Re: Someone should also study IQ !!

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 3/12/2005 12:13:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,

jeneric46324@... writes:

> Thats been done also.

>

and hypo folks of course had the higher IQs?

cindi

[Guest guest]

>Just oput of curiosityu what physiology book are you reading?

Vander, Sherman & Luciano's Human Physiology, 9th Edition (2004). $145 freaking

bucks because I couldn't find it used. I'm taking Biology 201 (Physiology) at

my local community college. I'm hoping to get into the ultrasound program this

fall. The book did go into a little more detail, but my instructor just glossed

over the whole thyroid/parathyroid. We did go over the

pituitary/hypothalamus/endocrine gland axis, though.

Laurie

[Guest guest]

>Just oput of curiosityu what physiology book are you reading?

Vander, Sherman & Luciano's Human Physiology, 9th Edition (2004). $145 freaking

bucks because I couldn't find it used. I'm taking Biology 201 (Physiology) at

my local community college. I'm hoping to get into the ultrasound program this

fall. The book did go into a little more detail, but my instructor just glossed

over the whole thyroid/parathyroid. We did go over the

pituitary/hypothalamus/endocrine gland axis, though.

Laurie

[Guest guest]

Yes. So do tree stumps.

-- prr

nc2406@... wrote:

and hypo folks of course had the higher IQs?

cindi