Really need your opinions on this, pls.

[Guest guest]

Hi

Just hoping to get some opinions please to clarify my thinking. I read

something, somewhere, sorry I don't recall the source, but the derm. said that

" no pimples, no rosacea " That got me to thinking about my own case. I was

diagnosed either in 1989 or 1990. My face is not red. My cheeks are a little

pink but I still need to wear blush to get a good just in from the cold blush. I

don't have nay bumps on my face, never did. No pimples or rash. Is it possible

that I have sensitive skin but not rosacea. I am terrified that by not using the

rosacea topicals that one day I will wake up and have the bumps and pimples.

After 12-13 years from the initial diagnosis with no sustained use of oral meds

or topical ( plus loads of abuse in terms of sun, AHA's and skincare ) wouldn't

I have the pimples by now. Dr. Nase seems to define rosacea in terms of stages

which if left untreated will advance pretty quickly.

Of course, I still have the problem with sensitive skin and how to deal with

that.

Have a relaxing and enjoyable weekend. And feel free to contact me personally if

you would prefer not to post. I love to chat .

Regards