Guest guest Posted March 14, 2002 Report Share Posted March 14, 2002 Like Rick, I've noticed sitting in front of a monitor is a guaranteed trigger, but only certain monitors. With my monitor at work, within 20 minutes I can feel the tingling, and within an hour, it's a full flush. However, I never flush at all sitting in front of my bedroom monitor. And no, it's not a stress-related flush... I spend at least the first half-hour of each work day just surfing the web... . Then I noticed on my home monitor there's a sticker that says " MPR II Low Emission - This device meets Swedish MPRII Standard " . After a bit of web research, it turns out the Swedish government came up with a set of standards for monitor electro-magnetic output for various wavelength ranges. From what I gather, MPR II is the most commonly used standard, and " TCO " is even stricter. IF anyone knows anything more about the MPR II, I'd be interested to know. The Best Buy website lists whether each monitor it sells is MPR II compliant. I can't say for sure whether that explains the difference in the monitors, but there definately is a difference. -Greg __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2002 Report Share Posted March 15, 2002 Just wanted to back what everyone was saying. Since Sept 11th I have had little or no flushing. Since Sept 11 I have also had no job. Yesterday I began temping, yesterday I began flushing again. I noticed it immediately, 20 minutes after sitting in from of this ridiculous screen. So. I've just placed a glare screen in front of my computer. Let's see if it helps. Marie emarjency emarjency@...> wrote: > IF anyone knows anything more about the MPR II, I'd be interested to > know. No more than what you described, Greg, but I checked on its stats and my rash-producing monitor is, " Low emissions for operator safety. MPR II and CE compliant. " (I also learned my monitor is 19 " , not 21 " . Oh well. It looks really big to me. ) From what I'm reading online, there seems to be a real but poorly documented relationship between rosacea-type skin reaction and monitors/video display terminals. It's interesting that all these resources describe essentially the same skin reaction -- the same one I experience, and what others are describing here too. A review article from the respected Southern Medical Journal looks critically at pre-1998 studies linking electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and several health complaints, including skin rashes, without hard conclusions: http://www.sma.org/smj1998/jansmj98/2text.htm I'm not very familiar with Curtis, but an article from that dermatology journal links facial rashes to electrostatic fields, not EMR: http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/7.31.html#subj6 On a Web site for building home computers, the increased dust burden around electrostatic fields and electricity hypersensitivity are implicated: http://www.webpromo-inc.com/pc/health.htm#Electromagnetism%20and% 20Health%20issues The last two references talk about electrostatic fields in low humidity environments, which definitely describes my home. There's a lot about electrostatic fields online, but much of it is promotional marketing to sell products. Janiemmca wrote: " Some people, myself included; also react to flourescent lights the same way...the topic was discussed way back.. " I've heard that fluorescent and other artifical lights are associated with photosensitivity to ultraviolet rays (UVR, as in sun light). Photosensitivity occurs with some diseases (not rosacea, I believe) but medicines such as doxycycline -- used to treat rosacea -- is well known to cause photosensitivity. I don't know much about fluorescent lighting, and there's relatively little online about it. But a patient newsletter from the University of Iowa Department of Dermatology (http://tray.dermatology.uiowa.edu/Vol1-3.SunProtect.pdf) says, " For maximum UV protection, acrylic diffusion shields should be placed over bare fluorescent light bulbs...to block the small amount of UV irradiation that can leak from such light sources (UVA greater than UVB). " Not all sunscreens block UVA, but sunblocking agents zinc oxide and titanium dioxide do a good job of blocking UVA rays. I wouldn't think that monitors emit enough UVRs to cause photosensitivity reaction, and the reaction doesn't sound like typical photosensitivity. For example, it looks different and tends to last days and weeks after exposure rather than dissipate within hours, as is typical for the above-described monitor rash. Perhaps someone knows more? Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD -- Please read the list highlights before posting to the whole group (http://rosacea.ii.net/toc.html). Your post will be delayed if you don't give a meaningful subject or trim your reply text. You must change the subject when replying to a digest ! See http://www.drnase.com for info on his recently published book. To leave the list send an email to rosacea-support-unsubscribe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2002 Report Share Posted March 18, 2002 (from robert) > I have just ordered two anti glare anti static and anti > radiation panels > from 3m ...... I am in front of a computer alot and if you > are interested I > will keep you posted if they help. I plan to give it about a > month fwiw Thanks. I just spoke to a commercial company that specializes in maintaining anti-static environments in computer workplaces. He recommended one of two products: either a monitor mat with an anti- static clip for grounding (about $10) or daily use of an anti-static wipe (20/box for about $3). I'll keep you all posted as well. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2002 Report Share Posted March 18, 2002 (from robert) > I have just ordered two anti glare anti static and anti > radiation panels > from 3m ...... I am in front of a computer alot and if you > are interested I > will keep you posted if they help. I plan to give it about a > month fwiw Thanks. I just spoke to a commercial company that specializes in maintaining anti-static environments in computer workplaces. He recommended one of two products: either a monitor mat with an anti- static clip for grounding (about $10) or daily use of an anti-static wipe (20/box for about $3). I'll keep you all posted as well. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2002 Report Share Posted March 18, 2002 (from robert) > I have just ordered two anti glare anti static and anti > radiation panels > from 3m ...... I am in front of a computer alot and if you > are interested I > will keep you posted if they help. I plan to give it about a > month fwiw Thanks. I just spoke to a commercial company that specializes in maintaining anti-static environments in computer workplaces. He recommended one of two products: either a monitor mat with an anti- static clip for grounding (about $10) or daily use of an anti-static wipe (20/box for about $3). I'll keep you all posted as well. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.