Guest guest Posted May 10, 2002 Report Share Posted May 10, 2002 Buzz, I am making your private email public because even putting Efudex on one spot is potentially too dangerous to keep private. Please, consult with a competent healthcare professional -- or at least show my last post and this one to someone who loves you, so they can talk you out of using this poison on your face. Let me go into greater detail, so you can better understand my concern. First, fluorouracil (5-FU), the active ingredient in Efudex, is an anti-cancer drug, which means it kills living cells. Precancerous conditions like actinic keratosis have cells that need to be killed, but that's not rosacea. In actinic keratosis, one single skin cell's DNA has been damaged (by the sun) and as a result begins rapidly reproducing out of control, and then each of these newly created cells, each with it's own copy of the damaged DNA, continue to reproduce wildly (it's like a pyramid scheme ). It's precancerous because while the DNA is damaged, the cell functions normally (other than its reveed-up proliferation). The problem, aside from the cosmetic pile-up of all these cells, is that there's a great likelihood one of these trillions of rapidly created cells will reproduce itself incorrectly in a critical way and not only proliferate out of control, but start taking over the nutrition of surrounding normal cells -- that's cancer. Efudex is like rat poison to cells. Because they reproduce so quickly, it kills off rapidly proliferating cells disproportionately to normally reproducing cells. What theoretically remains after treatment are only the normal cells that don't contain any of the damaged DNA that started the problem in the first place. Even more than you described, it's very rough treatment that requires scrupulous medical attention, and it's a hell of a month...but in the end it sounds like most patients do well. But this has nothing to do with rosacea, which has normal skin cells, reproducing normally. Even recurrent inflammatory lesions such as the seven you describe take place among normal skin cells. Inflammatory lesions are one common manifestion of rosacea and other skin disorders that involve involve inflammed pores (a pore is that portion of the otherwise buried sebaceous (oil) gland that opens onto the skin's surface). cea has a complicated pathophysiology, but it's not one that Efudex can impact upon. The problem with rosacea lies below the skin cell surface, below the epidermis, with the dilated leaky blood vessels and surrounding dermis filled with inflammatory molecules. Even when inflammatory lesions are due to acne vulgaris, the problem is microbacterial in part, and in part glandular sludge that recurs for a number of reasons, but reasons that have nothing to do with rapidly prolifering skin cells. Best of all, inflammatory lesions have their own treatments; the inflammatory component of rosacea can be managed far more successfully than it sounds like you're experiencing at present. There's lot of hope for you, buzz, you don't need Efudex. But there's more about Efudex you need to understand. A 5-FU treatment given intravenously for cancer is always followed by a " rescue " treatment, which is an intravenous anti-5-FU drug that halts the damage of 5-FU on normal cells. I'm not familar with 5-FU treatments on the skin, but in looking up Efudex in the pharm books I recall seeing its own version of a topical 'rescue' that is given during the second part of the treatment, first with the Efudex and then continued on its own, to help the skin recover. So if the Efudex doesn't hurt you, the rescue -- at least part of which includes high dose corticosteroids -- certainly will. So as damaging as Efudex treatment on rosacean skin can potentially be, I have no concept what placing Efudex alone without its 'rescue' counterpart could do. You obviously think that Efudex can be used like a pimple cream, but it's actually part of a whole system of care, with specific stages of treatment based on how the skin responds. It's not used alone, it's not dabbed on lesions. I hear your frustration with your seven spots, but do you really intend to risk hurting yourself by self-medicating with an anti- cancer drug? I know you don't want to hurt yourself, you want to help yourself, all you want is those seven lesions to go away permanently. But you risk permanently disfiguring yourself by using Efudex, and you risk even worse than that if the Efudex is absorbed into your bloodstream. Instead, why not share what treatments you've already tried unsuccessfully, or with only partial success. Maybe I or someone else can help. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD -=-=-= Thank you SOOOO much for taking the time to reply. It's folks like you that will eventually find a treatment for this. I will try this on one spot..just to see but after reading your note I will NOT try it on the whole face. I have 7 spots on my face that go through 3-4 week cycles healed,red bump.eruption,and healing.....this goes on over and over and has been for years....The same spots.....I even lance them through the same pore.....I know that's bad....however if I dont lance and release It just stays a raised red bump and hurts....if left alone it will stay like that indefinitly..go figure?...............again thanks for being a great contributor buzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2002 Report Share Posted May 12, 2002 Dr. Sy, thank you for sharing your knowledge, and clinical experience with Efudex. I hope Buzz follows our advice. I wish I were all heart -- especially back when my rosacea was at its worst. In those days it felt like I was all skin. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD > Buzz, > I have a lot of experience prescribing Efudex and I agree with Dr. Lazoff's > wise advice. If your purpose to embark on this therapy is to clear up the > existing inflammatory lesions on your face and to attain the post- Efudex > baby-smooth skin your friends achieved, you may be in for a surprise. The > risk/reward factor is quite unfavorable to rosacea. I am not aware of any > published study on the use of 5FU to treat rosacea, granting that your > lesions are rosacea-related. Topical 5FU has a selective and specific action > on actinic keratosis (premalignant sun damage). Therefore, if your lesions > are not AKs, this treatment will not benefit you and may cause irritant > dermatitis thus exacerbating the condition further. If your lesions are AKs, > there are more conservative alternative treatments available which will not > cause harm to your rosacean skin. I urge you to see a dermatologist for more > hands-on diagnosis and treatment. > > Marjorie, you are all heart! > > Sy MD > Sy Skin Care > http://www.lindasy.com > Voice:Toll-free 877-sy (546-3279) > Outside U.S.: > FAX: > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2002 Report Share Posted May 12, 2002 Dr. Sy, thank you for sharing your knowledge, and clinical experience with Efudex. I hope Buzz follows our advice. I wish I were all heart -- especially back when my rosacea was at its worst. In those days it felt like I was all skin. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD > Buzz, > I have a lot of experience prescribing Efudex and I agree with Dr. Lazoff's > wise advice. If your purpose to embark on this therapy is to clear up the > existing inflammatory lesions on your face and to attain the post- Efudex > baby-smooth skin your friends achieved, you may be in for a surprise. The > risk/reward factor is quite unfavorable to rosacea. I am not aware of any > published study on the use of 5FU to treat rosacea, granting that your > lesions are rosacea-related. Topical 5FU has a selective and specific action > on actinic keratosis (premalignant sun damage). Therefore, if your lesions > are not AKs, this treatment will not benefit you and may cause irritant > dermatitis thus exacerbating the condition further. If your lesions are AKs, > there are more conservative alternative treatments available which will not > cause harm to your rosacean skin. I urge you to see a dermatologist for more > hands-on diagnosis and treatment. > > Marjorie, you are all heart! > > Sy MD > Sy Skin Care > http://www.lindasy.com > Voice:Toll-free 877-sy (546-3279) > Outside U.S.: > FAX: > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2002 Report Share Posted May 12, 2002 Dr. Sy, thank you for sharing your knowledge, and clinical experience with Efudex. I hope Buzz follows our advice. I wish I were all heart -- especially back when my rosacea was at its worst. In those days it felt like I was all skin. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD > Buzz, > I have a lot of experience prescribing Efudex and I agree with Dr. Lazoff's > wise advice. If your purpose to embark on this therapy is to clear up the > existing inflammatory lesions on your face and to attain the post- Efudex > baby-smooth skin your friends achieved, you may be in for a surprise. The > risk/reward factor is quite unfavorable to rosacea. I am not aware of any > published study on the use of 5FU to treat rosacea, granting that your > lesions are rosacea-related. Topical 5FU has a selective and specific action > on actinic keratosis (premalignant sun damage). Therefore, if your lesions > are not AKs, this treatment will not benefit you and may cause irritant > dermatitis thus exacerbating the condition further. If your lesions are AKs, > there are more conservative alternative treatments available which will not > cause harm to your rosacean skin. I urge you to see a dermatologist for more > hands-on diagnosis and treatment. > > Marjorie, you are all heart! > > Sy MD > Sy Skin Care > http://www.lindasy.com > Voice:Toll-free 877-sy (546-3279) > Outside U.S.: > FAX: > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.